Short Reads

Guidelines by the International Olympic Committee for transgender athletes

Guidelines by the International Olympic Committee for transgender athletes

Guidelines by the International Olympic Committee for transgender athletes

05.02.2016 EU law

In November 2015, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) reached a consensus on “Sex Reassignment and Hyperandrogenism” for transgender athletes.

Since the 2003 Stockholm Consensus on Sex Reassignment in Sports, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of autonomy of gender identity in society, as reflected in the laws of many jurisdictions worldwide. However, there are also jurisdictions where autonomy of gender identity is not recognized in law at all.

To ensure insofar as possible that trans athletes are not excluded from the opportunity to participate in sporting competition, the IOC Consensus Meeting agreed guidelines to be taken in account by sports organizations when determining eligibility to compete in male and female competition.

Those who transit from female to male are eligible to compete in the male category without restriction but those who transit from male to female are eligible to compete in the female category under following conditions: the declaration in which the athlete declared that her gender identity is female, cannot be changed for at least 4 years; the athlete must demonstrate that her testosterone level in serum has been below 10 nmol/L for at least 12 months prior to her first competition and the total testosterone level in serum must remain below 10 nmol/L. When the athlete does not pass the compliance tests, a suspension will be inflected for a period of 12 months.

The IOC also made recommendations to put rules in place that protect women in sports and promote fair competition. Any discrimination of hyperandrogenism should be avoided by opening male competitions to female transgenders.

(IOC Consensus Meeting on Sex Reassignment and Hyperandrogenism, November 2015)

Team

Related news

04.12.2018 NL law
Stibbe appoints two new partners and three counsel

Inside Stibbe - Stibbe has promoted Floris ten Have (EU law, competition and regulation, Amsterdam) and Julien Bogaerts (corporate and finance, Brussels) to partner. In addition, Johan Zwemmer (employment law, Amsterdam), Li Wee Toh (energy and industry, Amsterdam) and Giovanni Smet (tax, Brussels) have been promoted to counsel. The new appointments will take effect on 1 January 2019.

Read more

04.12.2018 NL law
Stibbe benoemt twee nieuwe partners en drie counsels

Inside Stibbe - Stibbe benoemt Floris ten Have (mededingingsrecht, Amsterdam) en Julien Bogaerts (corporate en finance, Brussel) tot partner. Johan Zwemmer (arbeidsrecht, Amsterdam), Li Wee Toh (energierecht en industrie, Amsterdam) en Giovanni Smet (fiscaal recht, Brussel) zijn benoemd tot counsel. De nieuwe benoemingen gaan in vanaf 1 januari 2019.

Read more

08.11.2018 NL law
Valse of voorgewende redenen: grond voor een billijke vergoeding?

Articles - De werkgever zegt de arbeidsovereenkomst op na daarvoor toestemming te hebben gekregen van het UWV. De werkneemster klaagt – onder andere – dat in feite sprake was van een verstoorde arbeidsverhouding. De werkgever had volgens de werkneemster dus eigenlijk een ontbindingsverzoek wegens een verstoorde arbeidsverhouding moeten indienen. Daarom verzocht de werkneemster de kantonrechter een billijke vergoeding toe te kennen.

Read more

04.12.2018 NL law
Stibbe nomme deux nouveaux associés et trois counsels

Inside Stibbe - Stibbe a nommé Floris ten Have (droit de la concurrence, Amsterdam) et Julien Bogaerts (droit des sociétés et droit financier, Bruxelles) en tant qu’associés. Johan Zwemmer (droit du travail, Amsterdam), Li Wee Toh (droit de l’énergie et industrie, Amsterdam) et Giovanni Smet (droit fiscal, Bruxelles) deviennent, quant à eux, counsels. Ces nouvelles nominations prendront effet le 1er janvier 2019.

Read more

01.11.2018 NL law
Overgangspremie VPL geen onderdeel van bezoldiging WNT nu bestuurder geen gebruik kan maken van vroegpensioen

Articles - In deze annotatie bij de uitspraak van de Rechtbank Midden-Nederland op 13 augustus 2018 gaat Astrid Helstone op de vraag welke maatstaf moet worden aangelegd voor het wel of niet meerekenen van een looncomponent of afdracht van premies voor het wettelijk bezoldigingsmaximum onder de Wet normering topinkomens (WNT): is relevant of de topfunctionaris uiteindelijk wel of geen voordeel geniet? In geschil is hier de overgangspremie VPL.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring