Short Reads

The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation

The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation

The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation

14.12.2016 NL law

On 12 July 2016, four bills were adopted by the Senate in the context of the KEI-programme with the aim of digitizing, improving and also simplifying civil and administrative procedures. Publication of the legislative proposals  in the Bulletin of Acts and Decrees ('Staatsblad') followed on 21 July 2016. For an overview of the KEI-bills see the previously published blog 'KEI: Digitization of the justice system'.

To ensure that professionals like lawyers and bailiffs become familiar with the changes, an adjustment period of six months has been agreed. Originally, the implementation of the KEI legislation was supposed to take place from 1 February 2017. However, in a recent letter dated 29 November 2016 the Minister of Security and Justice confirmed to the House of Representatives that the Judiciary and the Dutch Bar Association, following consultation, have decided to take at least two extra months. They want to start the mandatory phase of digital litigation only once 'both parties feel that the system is ready for it '. This will be no earlier than 1 April 2017.

Since 1 November 2016, a pre-pilot has been in place at the courts of Gelderland and central Netherlands that allows parties to agree to litigate digitally in civil matters with mandatory legal representation and a stake of more than EUR 25,000. After an evaluation of this pilot by the Judiciary together with the Dutch Bar Association, which is expected in mid-January 2017,  they will decide whether to extend the voluntary phase or start implementing the first phase (Civil 1.0) by 1 April 2017.

The KEI legislation will be implemented in five phases, which are defined in a timeline. However, given the recent developments described above, we have assumed that each phase which is described below will start at least two months later than originally planned.

Civil 1.0 - Receivables (first instance) with mandatory legal representation

At the earliest, digital litigation for procedures at first instance with mandatory legal presentation will be rolled out from 1 April 2017. The rollout begins with a pilot in the courts of Gelderland and central Netherlands ('Midden-Nederland').  Mandatory digital litigation will be introduced five months later nationwide in all courts. This will be no earlier than September 2017.

The Supreme Court is developing its own digital platform and intends to maintain the original start date:1 February 2017.

Civil 2.0 – Claims on appeal

For cases on appeal, digital litigation will be introduced no earlier than September  2017 . The rollout will begin with a pilot at one court, presumably the Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden. At the earliest, mandatory digital litigation will be introduced nationwide in all appeal courts in February 2018.

Civil 3.0 – Claims without mandatory legal representation

For claims without mandatory legal representation, digital litigation will also start with a pilot at two courts. This is planned for autumn 2018. The national rollout is expected to take place five months later, in January/February 2019. Digital litigation for claim procedures before district courts is only mandatory for legal entities and professional attorneys. People who litigate without representation are not obliged to do so digitally.

Civil 4.0 – Application procedures

In April 2019, the rollout of digital litigation in application procedures is scheduled, with - again - a small-scale pilot project at first, followed by a national rollout (scheduled for September  2019). Once "KEI" applies to the application procedures, combined (claim and application in one) procedures may be brought.

Civil 5.0 - Preliminary relief proceedings

It is expected that the introduction (first a pilot and then national rollout) scheduled for preliminary relief proceedings will take place in April 2019.

Transitional law

The above raises the question of how the transitional law will be regulated with regard to the new legislation. When it comes to claims which have been served with a writ against the defendant and submitted to the civil courts before the day the KEI legislation comes into effect, the old law applies. If the day of service or filing falls on or after the date the KEI legislation comes into effect, the new law applies (see Kamerstukken II 2014/15, 34 059, 3 , p. 119).

Team

Related news

26.09.2018 BE law
Eerlijke marktpraktijken, slechtmaking en de vrijheid van meningsuiting

Articles - Op 1 maart 2018, oordeelde het hof van beroep te Brussel[1] dat een aan derden verzonden e-mailbericht waarin werd meegedeeld dat alle samenwerking met de betrokken partij was beëindigd op grond van het feit dat de door deze laatste geleverde diensten waren bekritiseerd wegens hun slechte kwaliteit, en dit terwijl er hieromtrent een procedure hangende is, een daad van slechtmaking is, verboden door artikel VI.104 WER. Hetzelfde geldt voor een e-mailbericht aan derden, waarin een bepaalde persoon wordt afgedaan als een “individu zonder scrupules”.

Read more

26.09.2018 BE law
Pratiques honnêtes du marché, dénigrement et la liberté d’expression

Articles - Par jugement du 1er mars 2018, la cour d’appel de Bruxelles[1] a déclaré qu’un courriel adressé à des tiers, indiquant qu’il aurait été mis fin à toute collaboration avec la partie en cause au motif que les prestations fournies par celle-ci auraient été critiquées en raison de leur piètre qualité alors qu’une procédure est pendante à cet égard, constitue un acte de dénigrement interdit au sens de l’article VI.104. du CDE. Il en est de même d’un courriel adressé à des tiers, indiquant qu’une personne identifiée est un «  individu sans scrupules ».

Read more

19.10.2018 EU law
EU top court on international jurisdiction in tort cases: localising pure financial loss, continued

Short Reads - On 12 September 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that in prospectus liability cases, a court can only assume international jurisdiction on the basis that the alleged damage consists of purely financial loss which occurred directly in an investor's bank account held with a bank established within its jurisdiction if additional specific circumstances also contribute to that court assuming jurisdiction.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring