umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
bodrum escort
Short Reads

The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation

The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation

The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation

14.12.2016 NL law

On 12 July 2016, four bills were adopted by the Senate in the context of the KEI-programme with the aim of digitizing, improving and also simplifying civil and administrative procedures. Publication of the legislative proposals  in the Bulletin of Acts and Decrees ('Staatsblad') followed on 21 July 2016. For an overview of the KEI-bills see the previously published blog 'KEI: Digitization of the justice system'.

To ensure that professionals like lawyers and bailiffs become familiar with the changes, an adjustment period of six months has been agreed. Originally, the implementation of the KEI legislation was supposed to take place from 1 February 2017. However, in a recent letter dated 29 November 2016 the Minister of Security and Justice confirmed to the House of Representatives that the Judiciary and the Dutch Bar Association, following consultation, have decided to take at least two extra months. They want to start the mandatory phase of digital litigation only once 'both parties feel that the system is ready for it '. This will be no earlier than 1 April 2017.

Since 1 November 2016, a pre-pilot has been in place at the courts of Gelderland and central Netherlands that allows parties to agree to litigate digitally in civil matters with mandatory legal representation and a stake of more than EUR 25,000. After an evaluation of this pilot by the Judiciary together with the Dutch Bar Association, which is expected in mid-January 2017,  they will decide whether to extend the voluntary phase or start implementing the first phase (Civil 1.0) by 1 April 2017.

The KEI legislation will be implemented in five phases, which are defined in a timeline. However, given the recent developments described above, we have assumed that each phase which is described below will start at least two months later than originally planned.

Civil 1.0 - Receivables (first instance) with mandatory legal representation

At the earliest, digital litigation for procedures at first instance with mandatory legal presentation will be rolled out from 1 April 2017. The rollout begins with a pilot in the courts of Gelderland and central Netherlands ('Midden-Nederland').  Mandatory digital litigation will be introduced five months later nationwide in all courts. This will be no earlier than September 2017.

The Supreme Court is developing its own digital platform and intends to maintain the original start date:1 February 2017.

Civil 2.0 – Claims on appeal

For cases on appeal, digital litigation will be introduced no earlier than September  2017 . The rollout will begin with a pilot at one court, presumably the Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden. At the earliest, mandatory digital litigation will be introduced nationwide in all appeal courts in February 2018.

Civil 3.0 – Claims without mandatory legal representation

For claims without mandatory legal representation, digital litigation will also start with a pilot at two courts. This is planned for autumn 2018. The national rollout is expected to take place five months later, in January/February 2019. Digital litigation for claim procedures before district courts is only mandatory for legal entities and professional attorneys. People who litigate without representation are not obliged to do so digitally.

Civil 4.0 – Application procedures

In April 2019, the rollout of digital litigation in application procedures is scheduled, with - again - a small-scale pilot project at first, followed by a national rollout (scheduled for September  2019). Once "KEI" applies to the application procedures, combined (claim and application in one) procedures may be brought.

Civil 5.0 - Preliminary relief proceedings

It is expected that the introduction (first a pilot and then national rollout) scheduled for preliminary relief proceedings will take place in April 2019.

Transitional law

The above raises the question of how the transitional law will be regulated with regard to the new legislation. When it comes to claims which have been served with a writ against the defendant and submitted to the civil courts before the day the KEI legislation comes into effect, the old law applies. If the day of service or filing falls on or after the date the KEI legislation comes into effect, the new law applies (see Kamerstukken II 2014/15, 34 059, 3 , p. 119).

Team

Related news

29.01.2021 NL law
Publicatie en inwerkingtreding Wet ongewenste zeggenschap telecommunicatie

Short Reads - Op 12 juni 2020 is een wet gepubliceerd om ongewenste overnames in de telecommunicatiesector tegen te gaan: de Wet ongewenste zeggenschap telecommunicatie. Deze wet (die de vorm heeft van een nieuw hoofdstuk in de Telecommunicatiewet) moet volgens de memorie van toelichting voorkomen dat een op basis van geopolitieke motieven handelende partij een te grote invloed krijgt op Nederlandse telecommunicatiepartijen.

Read more

28.01.2021 NL law
Negotiating a contract under conditions; subject to approval

Short Reads - In Dutch legal practice, one of the most common conditions is the reservation of approval or the “subject to approval” clause. A “subject to approval” clause provides a condition under which an agreement will be concluded (totstandkomingsvoorwaarde), a suspensive condition (opschortende voorwaarde) or a resolutive condition (ontbindende voorwaarde). This depends on the wording of the clause and the circumstances of the case.

Read more

27.01.2021 NL law
Overzichtsuitspraak ABRvS: overmacht en de wettelijke dwangsommen wegens niet tijdig beslissen. Hoe werkt dat?

Short Reads - Overmacht bij een bestuursorgaan schort beslistermijnen en wettelijke dwangsomtermijnen zelfstandig op. Ook als een bestuursorgaan daarvan geen mededeling stuurt. Dat oordeelt de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State (de Afdeling) in een overzichtsuitspraak van 16 december 2020. In dit blogbericht gaan wij nader in op de achtergrond van die uitspraak en duiden wij wat dit betekent voor de praktijk.

Read more