Short Reads

Proposed amendments to the Dutch Financial Supervision Act in 2017 and 2018, and the revision of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act

Proposed amendments Dutch Financial Supervision Act 2017 and 2018

Proposed amendments to the Dutch Financial Supervision Act in 2017 and 2018, and the revision of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act

19.12.2016 NL law

On 27 July 2016, the preliminary draft of the Financial Markets Amendment Decree 2017 (Wijzigingsbesluit financiële markten 2017) and the bill amending the Dutch Financial Supervision Act 2018 (Wijzigingswet financiële markten 2018) were offered for consultation.

The most important changes proposed include the inducement ban for advisors and intermediaries, the requirement that the Dutch Central Bank must approve guarantees issued by parent companies, and an amendment to the current rules regarding the remuneration policies of financial institutions. It is envisaged that the proposed amendments will enter into force on 1 July 2017 and 1 July 2018 respectively. Unlike previous years, there is no proposed legislation to amend the Dutch Financial Supervision Act in 2017, which means that there will be no amendments in the first half of next year.

Furthermore, the Dutch legislator is currently exploring whether the Dutch Financial Supervision Act can be made clearer and more accessible to the market.

Changes from 1 July 2017

The preliminary draft of the Financial Markets Amendment Decree 2017 (Wijzigingsbesluit financiële markten 2017) proposes amendments relating to:

(I) the inducement ban for advisors and intermediaries advising on investments in investment funds; and
(II) robo-advice.

Scope of the inducement ban

Investment firms and financial service providers are prohibited from paying or receiving inducements to or from the provider for which they act as advisor or an intermediary. They must be paid directly by the client. In practice, certain investment firms that manage portfolio's for clients allow that the fee paid by a client to an advisor/intermediary is transferred from the investment account of the client. Consequently, the total amount on the investment account is not used to build up capital, since part of that amount is used to pay the advisor/intermediary. This is not appropriate according to the Dutch legislator. Therefore, the Conduct of Business Supervision on Financial Undertakings Decree under the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Besluit gedragstoezicht financiële markten) will be amended to prohibit this. 

Robo-advice on financial products

Robo-advice means that clients are advised by "robo-advisors" without involving an actual person. The Dutch legislator wants to ensure that a client accessing such automated advice has the same protection as a client that is advised by an actual person. That is why financial institutions providing automated advice will be required to have procedures in place to ensure compliance with the same laws and regulations that apply to advice given by an actual person. In addition, for each financial product that is available using the automated service the investment firm must appoint a person that is responsible for the automated advice given.

Changes from 1 July 2018

The preliminary draft amending the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wijzigingswet financiële markten 2018) includes amendments relating to:

(I) the approval of the Dutch Central Bank ("DNB") of guarantees issued by banks, investment firms or insurance companies;
(II) a longer decision period for an application for a banking license; and
(III) remuneration policies of financial institutions.

Power of DNB to approve company guarantees

According to the Dutch legislator, guarantees relating to the debts of another (legal) person can undermine the solvency of the parent company and can reduce the liquidation possibilities of the group. The Dutch legislator therefore proposes that the DNB, or the European Central Bank ("ECB") for significant banks, must grant prior approval for the issuance of guarantees by (parent companies of) banks, investment firms an insurance companies with their statutory seat in the Netherlands. These guarantees include letters of comfort with respect to subsidiaries (403-verklaring).

A guarantee issued without approval will be null and void. The proposed amendment will not affect guarantees issued before the date this amendment of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act comes into effect.

Changes in remuneration policy

The Dutch legislator also proposes to amend the current rules on remuneration policies of financial institutions. Managers of investment funds, managers of UCITS and investment firms acting for their own account are currently exempt from the 20% bonus cap. The Dutch legislator proposes that this exemption should no longer apply if these entities are part of a consolidated group. This amendment is in line with the guidelines on sound remuneration policies under the Capital Requirements Directive IV, issued by the European Banking Association in December 2015 (source).

The legislative text of the proposed amendment and the explanatory memorandum can be found here.

An outline policy memorandum regarding a revision of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act

As a result of recommendations from the Council of State (Raad van State), the Dutch legislator is currently exploring whether the Dutch Financial Supervision Act can be made more user friendly.

The Dutch Financial Supervision Act, which entered into force on 1 January 2007, has been amended 75 times. As a result, the existing legislation has become difficult to apply in practice. The Dutch Minister of Finance aims to explore how to make the Dutch Financial Supervision Act clearer and more accessible.

The Dutch legislator has already held discussions with representatives from the financial sector, supervisory authorities, academics, and other stakeholders such as consumer organizations. Based on these discussions, together with further studies and analysis, the Dutch Minister of Finance published five options to amend the Dutch Financial Supervision Act in a consultation document dated 22 November 2016. The consultation period ends on 28 February 2017. The consultation document can be found here.

Team

Related news

15.10.2021 NL law
BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

Short Reads - Recently, the Dutch bill for the implementation of BRRD II (i.e. Directive (EU) 2014/59 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/879) in the Netherlands was submitted to Dutch Parliament, where it is currently under debate.

Read more

14.10.2021 NL law
NFTs: New legal challenges on the horizon

Short Reads - Non-Fungible Tokens, widely known as NFTs, have recently gained much attention due to their role in the transfer of digital artworks. The market for NFTs grew from USD 13.5m in the first six months of 2020 to USD 2.5bn in the first half of 2021 and is still growing at an expansive rate. Notwithstanding their increasing popularity in the world of art, NFTs have many potential applications. In this blog Maciek Bednarski, Annemijn Witkam and Roderik Vrolijk explain what NFTs are and describe some of the legal challenges they will bring about.

Read more

01.10.2021 NL law
Vanaf 1 oktober strengere regelgeving voor verkoop van turbo’s aan particuliere beleggers

Short Reads - Turbobeleggers nemen veel risico’s en verliezen gemiddeld veel geld. De AFM vindt dat particuliere beleggers onvoldoende beschermd worden tegen de risico’s van turbo’s. De verkoop van turbo’s aan deze beleggers wordt daarom aan banden gelegd. Met ingang van 1 oktober geldt een hefboombeperking, een verplichte risicowaarschuwing en een verbod op handelsbonussen. Daarmee wil de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) particuliere beleggers beter beschermen tegen de risico’s van turbo’s.

Read more

11.10.2021 NL law
Vervolgonderzoek van de AFM naar incidentmeldingen door asset managers

Articles - Sinds de uitbraak van het coronavirus wordt ook in de financiële sector meer op afstand samengewerkt. Dat brengt specifieke risico’s met zich mee. De Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) gaat daarom vervolgonderzoek doen naar het melden van incidenten door asset managers. De reden is het uitblijven van een stijging van het aantal incidentmeldingen ondanks herhaalde oproepen daartoe.

Read more

20.09.2021 NL law
AFM: Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid

Articles - Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid. De informatieverschaffing van fondsen over duurzaamheidsrisico’s en duurzaamheidskenmerken is nog vaak te algemeen, daardoor krijgen beleggers te weinig inzicht in waar ze in investeren. Dat is een van de conclusies van de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) in een verkennend onderzoek naar de toepassing van de Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

Read more