Short Reads

Collection of enforcement proceeds under an undisclosed right of pledge

Collection of enforcement proceeds under undisclosed right of pledge

Collection of enforcement proceeds under an undisclosed right of pledge

19.12.2016 NL law

The District Court of Oost-Brabant: At the time of collection, if a trustee in bankruptcy has collected enforcement proceeds from receivables pledged under an  undisclosed right of pledge over receivables, the pledgee of the undisclosed right of pledge remains entitled to claim such proceeds from the trustee in bankruptcy, provided it has not collected the proceeds in its capacity as representative of the insolvent pledgor. The claim, however, only applies to proceeds which have been paid directly into the liquidation account.

District Court of Oost-Brabant 26 August 2016 (ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2016:5086)

This ruling addresses the position of a pledgee under an undisclosed right of pledge over receivables in insolvency, and more specifically the position with whether a pledgee has a claim to any enforcement proceeds collected by a trustee in bankruptcy prior to the right of pledge being disclosed - thereby notifying the relevant debtors that only payment to the pledgee and not the (insolvent) pledgor can discharge such debtor from its payment obligation.

The background of this judgment concerned two rights of pledge over receivables. The first ranking disclosed right of pledge was granted in favour of a financial institution in the Netherlands with the second ranking undisclosed right of pledge having been granted in favour of the claimant. Following insolvency of the pledgor, the trustee commenced enforcement of the first ranking right of pledge on behalf of the financial institution as pledgee by collecting the pledged receivables. Part of the enforcement proceeds was paid directly into a bank account held with the financial institution that was also pledgee under the first ranking right of pledge and was subsequently set off against the outstanding claim of the financial institution. Another part of the enforcement proceeds was paid directly into the liquidation account.

Following this collection process, the holder of the second ranking undisclosed right of pledge claimed priority in respect of the enforcement proceeds held in the liquidation account within the settlement of the order of priority of debts. The trustee argued, however, that the second ranking right of pledge was terminated by operation of law following collection of the secured receivables. This argument was based on the landmark decision of 17 February 1995 (Mulder q.q. / CLBN) of the Supreme Court – in which it ruled that that the collection by a trustee in bankruptcy of enforcement proceeds from receivables pledged under an (at the moment of collection) undisclosed right of pledge over receivables, resulted in termination of the undisclosed right of pledge over such receivables by operation of law and thereby in the pledgee obtaining the position of unsecured creditor.

In this seemingly similar case, the court ruled, however, that the undisclosed right of pledge did not terminate and that the holder of the undisclosed right of pledge maintained its priority in respect of the proceeds held in the liquidation account within the settlement of the order of priority of debts. The difference in this instance being that the trustee did not collect the receivables in its capacity as trustee of the insolvent pledgor, but rather on behalf of another pledgee as part of the enforcement of the first ranking right of pledge. The court further held that the claimant's claim only extended to the enforcement proceeds that had been paid directly into the liquidation account and not those proceeds paid directly into a bank account held with the financial institution that was also pledgee under the first ranking right of pledge.

Team

Related news

21.07.2020 NL law
Financiële sector moet klimaatrisico’s bespreken met klanten

Short Reads - Financiële instellingen moeten in gesprekken met klanten aandacht besteden aan klimaatrisico’s. Bij zakelijke klanten met name over de mogelijke impact van klimaatrisico’s op hun bedrijfsvoering en bij hypotheekeigenaren bijvoorbeeld over de verduurzaming van hun woning. Ook in het licht van het Klimaatcommitment van de financiële sector is dit van belang. Dit blijkt uit een bloemlezing van acht Nederlandse financiële instellingen, verenigd onder het Platform voor Duurzame financiering.

Read more

29.06.2020 NL law
European Banking Federation Guidance on testing of Cloud Exit Strategy

Short Reads - Financial institutions may outsource critical or important functions to cloud service providers (“CSPs”). On 25 February 2019 the European Banking Authority (“EBA”) provided guidelines (the “EBA Guidelines”) laying out the framework for outsourcing arrangements. The EBA Guidelines require institutions to have a comprehensive, documented and sufficiently tested exit strategy (including a mandatory exit plan) when they outsource critical or important functions.

Read more

29.06.2020 NL law
ABC-constructie bij vastgoedtransactie: verkoopbedrijf heeft afgeleid belang en is niet ontvankelijk bij bestuursrechter

Short Reads - Het zijn van ‘belanghebbende’ is een noodzakelijke voorwaarde om een ontvankelijk beroep te kunnen instellen bij de bestuursrechter (artikel 1:2 lid 1 Awb). Een persoon moet een zelfstandig en eigen belang hebben dat niet is afgeleid van een ander om als belanghebbende te kunnen worden aangemerkt. Dit is het leerstuk van afgeleid belang.

Read more

29.06.2020 NL law
Nieuwe publicaties van het netwerk van centrale banken en toezichthouders

Short Reads - Het Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) benadrukt opnieuw het toenemende belang van klimaatverandering voor centrale banken en toezichthouders. Klimaatverandering leidt tot financiële risico’s en dat betekent dat centrale banken en toezichthouders klimaat- en milieugerelateerde risico’s in hun beleid en toezicht moeten integreren.

Read more