Short Reads

Collection of enforcement proceeds under an undisclosed right of pledge

Collection of enforcement proceeds under undisclosed right of pledge

Collection of enforcement proceeds under an undisclosed right of pledge

19.12.2016 NL law

The District Court of Oost-Brabant: At the time of collection, if a trustee in bankruptcy has collected enforcement proceeds from receivables pledged under an  undisclosed right of pledge over receivables, the pledgee of the undisclosed right of pledge remains entitled to claim such proceeds from the trustee in bankruptcy, provided it has not collected the proceeds in its capacity as representative of the insolvent pledgor. The claim, however, only applies to proceeds which have been paid directly into the liquidation account.

District Court of Oost-Brabant 26 August 2016 (ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2016:5086)

This ruling addresses the position of a pledgee under an undisclosed right of pledge over receivables in insolvency, and more specifically the position with whether a pledgee has a claim to any enforcement proceeds collected by a trustee in bankruptcy prior to the right of pledge being disclosed - thereby notifying the relevant debtors that only payment to the pledgee and not the (insolvent) pledgor can discharge such debtor from its payment obligation.

The background of this judgment concerned two rights of pledge over receivables. The first ranking disclosed right of pledge was granted in favour of a financial institution in the Netherlands with the second ranking undisclosed right of pledge having been granted in favour of the claimant. Following insolvency of the pledgor, the trustee commenced enforcement of the first ranking right of pledge on behalf of the financial institution as pledgee by collecting the pledged receivables. Part of the enforcement proceeds was paid directly into a bank account held with the financial institution that was also pledgee under the first ranking right of pledge and was subsequently set off against the outstanding claim of the financial institution. Another part of the enforcement proceeds was paid directly into the liquidation account.

Following this collection process, the holder of the second ranking undisclosed right of pledge claimed priority in respect of the enforcement proceeds held in the liquidation account within the settlement of the order of priority of debts. The trustee argued, however, that the second ranking right of pledge was terminated by operation of law following collection of the secured receivables. This argument was based on the landmark decision of 17 February 1995 (Mulder q.q. / CLBN) of the Supreme Court – in which it ruled that that the collection by a trustee in bankruptcy of enforcement proceeds from receivables pledged under an (at the moment of collection) undisclosed right of pledge over receivables, resulted in termination of the undisclosed right of pledge over such receivables by operation of law and thereby in the pledgee obtaining the position of unsecured creditor.

In this seemingly similar case, the court ruled, however, that the undisclosed right of pledge did not terminate and that the holder of the undisclosed right of pledge maintained its priority in respect of the proceeds held in the liquidation account within the settlement of the order of priority of debts. The difference in this instance being that the trustee did not collect the receivables in its capacity as trustee of the insolvent pledgor, but rather on behalf of another pledgee as part of the enforcement of the first ranking right of pledge. The court further held that the claimant's claim only extended to the enforcement proceeds that had been paid directly into the liquidation account and not those proceeds paid directly into a bank account held with the financial institution that was also pledgee under the first ranking right of pledge.

Team

Related news

17.01.2020 LU law
Stibbe Luxembourg étend son offre de services par la venue de nouveaux associés et counsels au sein des pratiques spécialisées en gestion d’actifs/fonds d’investissement, en droit des sociétés ainsi qu’en droit financier

Inside Stibbe - Luxembourg, le 17 janvier 2020 – Stibbe renforce ses pratiques spécialisées en droit des sociétés, en droit financier ainsi qu’en gestion d’actifs/fonds d’investissement par la venue de Bernard Beerens (associé, droit des sociétés), Audrey Jarreton (counsel, droit bancaire et financier), Edouard d’Anterroches (associé, fonds d’investissement), Victorien Hémery (associé, fonds d’investissement) et Dayana Bert (counsel, fonds d’investissement).

Read more

20.01.2020 BE law
Most commonly used unregulated real estate investment vehicles in Belgium

Articles - On 1 January 2020, the mandatory provisions of the Code for Companies and Associations or "BCAC" entered into force. This article provides an overview of the main characteristics of the most commonly used unregulated real estate vehicles in Belgium (the regulated real estate vehicles are part of a separate publication that will be published shortly). It does not intend to provide a complete overview of all unregulated investment vehicles available, but it does give insight into the main characteristics of the most commonly used investment vehicles in Belgium.

Read more

17.01.2020 LU law
Stibbe boosts service offering in Luxembourg with new partners and counsel for asset management/funds and corporate & finance

Inside Stibbe - Luxembourg, 17 January 2020 – Stibbe reinforces its corporate & finance and asset management/funds practices in Luxembourg with the hire of Bernard Beerens (corporate partner), Audrey Jarreton (banking and finance counsel), Edouard d’Anterroches (investment funds partner), Victorien Hémery (investment funds partner), and Dayana Bert (investment funds counsel). Their arrival comes after the recent hire of tax partner Johan Léonard. All of these new additions demonstrate the firm’s commitment to expanding Stibbe’s service offering in Luxembourg.

Read more

15.01.2020 NL law
The Dutch scheme - a summary of the upcoming new restructuring tool

Short Reads - As mentioned in our earlier blog, the Dutch legislator has prepared a bill – the Act on confirmation of private restructuring plans (Wet homologatie onderhands akkoord) – introducing a framework that allows debtors to restructure their debts outside formal insolvency proceedings (the “Dutch Scheme“). We expect this highly-anticipated bill to enter into force by this summer. The Dutch Scheme combines features from the UK Scheme of Arrangement and the US Chapter 11 proceedings. Below, we summarize certain key aspects of the Dutch Scheme.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring