Short Reads

European Commission deems support measures in favour of Dutch football clubs in line with State aid rules

European Commission deems support measures in favour of Dutch footbal

European Commission deems support measures in favour of Dutch football clubs in line with State aid rules

02.08.2016 NL law

On 4 July 2016, the European Commission decided that support measures granted by several Dutch municipalities to football clubs do not breach State aid rules. 

This marks the end of a long in-depth investigation into these measures started by the Commission in 2013.

In the years 2011 and 2012 some Dutch football clubs experienced financial problems, namely PSV, Den Bosch, MVV Maastricht, NEC and Willem II. The municipalities of these clubs decided to take measures to support them. The support these clubs received from their respective municipalities took different forms.

The municipality of Eindhoven entered into a sale and leaseback transaction with PSV. This transaction entailed that the municipality of Eindhoven (i) bought the land on which the Philips stadium and a training block were built for a price of EUR 48,385,000 and (ii) leased it back to the football club.

The other four clubs received direct financial aid from their respective municipalities. The municipality of Maastricht for instance waived a claim of EUR1.7 million on MVV Maastricht and bought the football stadium and training grounds for EUR 1.85 million. The municipality of Tilburg lowered the rent of the stadium with retroactive effect, resulting in a total advantage for Willem II of EUR 2.4 million.

However, there were conditions attached to the aid granted to the four clubs. The football clubs contributed significantly to the costs of their restructuring and agreed to limit the negative effects of the support measures on the market for example by reducing the number of employees, the number of registered players and players' wages.

The Commission found that the transaction between the municipality of Eindhoven and PSV had been carried out on terms acceptable to a market investor, and therefore did not constitute aid. In its assessment, the Commission took account of an independent external valuation report that was used by the municipality as a basis of the transaction. However, the Commission concluded that the support measures to the other football clubs constituted State aid, which is compatible with the European market since it complies with the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty due to the conditions attached to the aid.

As a result of the Commission's decision, no State aid has to be recovered by the municipalities from the football clubs in question. This stands in stark contrast with the case about the State aid granted to Spanish football clubs. Spain has to recover large amount of aid from Spanish football clubs.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of August 2016. Other articles in this newsletter:

  1. Court of Justice clarifies the legality of royalty payments in the event of revocation or non-infringement of the licensed patent 
  2. General Court confirms fines imposed on the basis of economic continuity in maritime hose cartel 
  3. European Commission imposes record cartel fine on truck manufacturers for price fixing 
  4. European Commission deems support measures in favour of Dutch football clubs in line with State aid rules 
  5. Dutch District Court ruled that parent companies cannot be held liable for damages arising from antitrust infringements committed by their subsidiaries 
  6. ACM lowered fines in the pepper cartel case 
  7. Dutch Supreme Court confirms the availability of a passing-on defence in antitrust damages litigation 
  8. Brussels Court of Appeal rules that concerted lobbying efforts of cement producers do not breach competition law 
  9. Belgian competition authority upholds licence refusal to football club White Star

Source: Competition Law Newsletter August 2016

Team

Related news

02.07.2020 NL law
European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

Short Reads - The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Please share – ACM conditionally clears shared mobility platform merger

Short Reads - There may soon be a new competition tool available to tackle structural competition concerns in dynamic tech and platform markets. Until then, competition authorities resort to existing tools to deal with these markets. The Dutch competition authority (ACM) recently subjected the merger of two emerging platforms – without significant market footprint – to behavioural remedies. On 20 May 2020, the ACM cleared the merger between the travel apps of Dutch rail operator NS and transport company Pon.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
No proof of competitive disadvantage? No abusive favouritism

Short Reads - Companies claiming abuse of dominance in civil proceedings have their work cut out for them, as demonstrated by a ruling of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Real estate association VBO had accused dominant online platform Funda of favouritism. However, in line with the District Court’s earlier ruling, the Appeal Court dismissed the claim for insufficient evidence of negative effects on competition. The ruling confirms that the effect-based approach also applies in civil abuse claims, and that the standard of proof is high.    

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

Short Reads - Large online platforms may face more regulatory obligations, whilst non-dominant companies’ unilateral conduct may soon be curbed. The European Commission intends to tool up its kit by adding a new regulation to keep digital gatekeepers in check, as well as providing more clarity on how to define digital markets in its new Market Definition Notice.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Not so fast – General Court clarifies merger control test

Short Reads - There is no magical number when it comes to “4-to-3” telecom mergers. On 28 May 2020, the EU’s General Court (“Court”) handed down a landmark judgment annulling a 2016 decision of the European Commission (“Commission”) blocking the merger between O2 UK and Three. The judgment fine-tunes the Commission’s application of the “significant impediment to effective competition” test for horizontal mergers and raises the bar for proving the removal of an “important competitive force” as a result of the merger.  

Read more