Conference

10 okt 2016 IPBA Conference: Government’s role and regulatory tools in cross-border transactions between Asia Pacific and Europe

10 okt 2016 IPBA Conference: Government’s role and regulatory tools in cross-border transactions between Asia Pacific and Europe

10 okt 2016 IPBA Conference: Government’s role and regulatory tools in cross-border transactions between Asia Pacific and Europe

26.08.2016 BE law

The topic for this year's Mid-Year Regional Conference to be held at our offices in Brussels on Monday 10 October 2016 is to present “Government’s role and regulatory tools in cross-border transactions between Asia Pacific and Europe”.

Please note that a registration fee will be required to participate.

For more information, please contact Sofie Van Yperzeele. If you wish to register for this conference, please click here.

In the first quarter of 2016, major cross-border transactions have continued to make the headlines. As part thereof, China has claimed its largest quarterly share of global mergers and acquisitions on record, with mainland companies’ takeovers of foreign targets accounting for almost one-sixth of global deal activity. Recipient jurisdictions often view cross-border investments as a mixed blessing – balancing strengthened economic relations against concerns about the loss of decision-making centres as well as against policy considerations such as security, (lack of) reciprocity and fears of erosion of environmental and social responsibility standards. At the same time, developed world companies that have invested in or are investing in lower-cost jurisdictions are faced with headwinds such as limited market access, perceived selective enforcement of such jurisdictions' domestic laws, and generally more assertive supervision of their activities by government.

Against this background, the Regional Conference will review and discuss the various tools and regulations that governments over the world are increasingly using to monitor cross-border deal activity.
 

Topics that will be discussed include: 

Market restrictions in emerging economies 

  • “Going out” – domestic encouragement of outbound transactions 
  • Granting of market status economy to China 
  • Security considerations in assessing and authorising foreign investment: is yoghurt a vital national asset? The reach and influence of CFIUS and other similar regimes. 
  • Antitrust review as a policy instrument? The Hutchison O2 case. Are SOEs amalgated to their shareholder-state? 
  • Bidding wars : a panel discussion around some recent cases (Starwood, Club Med, Kuka, Toshiba and others).
     

For the detailed programme, please click here.
 

Sponsors of this conference:

logo stibbe        Sponsors IPBA    logo mvvp

About IPBA

The Inter-Pacific Bar Association ("IPBA") is an international association of business and commercial lawyers who live in, or otherwise have a strong interest in, the Asia-Pacific Region. It was established in April 1991 at an organizing conference held in Tokyo attended by more than 500 lawyers from countries within the Asia-Pacific Region. Since then, it has grown to become the preeminent legal association in this Region, with membership drawn from throughout the world, and currently has over 1500 members from over 65 jurisdictions worldwide. The IPBA's principal activities include its Annual General Meeting and Conference, which provides a unique opportunity for lawyers interested in the Asia-Pacific Region to discuss legal, business and policy issues affecting this Region in a manner that fosters collegiality and the development of close personal and professional relationships that enhance legal practice opportunities through professional networking. The IPBA also holds a mid-year meeting of the council devoted to its business affairs, after which a conference on current substantive legal issues is held.

Related news

21.03.2019 NL law
15 aspects of Brexit you did not know

Short Reads - A Brexit without a deal, or with a deal that does not cover all relevant aspects, is still a potential scenario. We have highlighted a number of unexpected legal consequences of Brexit in such a no deal or incomplete deal scenario.

Read more

10.01.2019 BE law
De vrijwaring van de Vlaamse strategische belangen tegen vijandige buitenlandse investeerders

Articles - Op 1 januari 2019 trad het Vlaamse Bestuursdecreet in werking. Dit decreet bevat – naast diverse generieke bepalingen betreffende de relatie tussen burger en overheid enerzijds, en de organisatie en werking van de overheid anderzijds – een specifieke regeling, die de strategische belangen van Vlaanderen moet vrijwaren.  

Read more

12.03.2019 LU law
Entry into force of the RBE Regulation and update

Articles - The Grand-Ducal Regulation of 15 February 2019 on the registration, payment of administrative fees and access to information recorded in the register of beneficial owners (the “RBE Regulation”) entered into force on 1 March 2019 and depicts the practical aspects of the Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a beneficial owner register (the “RBE Law”). Another document, the LBR Circular 19/01 (the “Circular”) issued by the Luxembourg Business Registers on 25 February 2019  further describes the new register of beneficial owners (the “RBE”) with the aim of helping users. 

Read more

28.09.2018 BE law
Second Belgian Offshore Wind Farm Area to be tendered

Articles - At the Council of Ministers session on 31 August 2018, the principle memorandum Tendering offshore wind farms from 2020 onwards was approved. This memorandum sets out the actions and timing for the new area for offshore wind farm (1.7 GW). Very similar to what has happened in the Netherlands, the right to construct and operate new wind farms will be tendered in hope of not having to grant any subsidies at all.

Read more

27.07.2018 EU law
Energy Charter Treaty arbitration clause cannot be relied on in intra-EU investment disputes, says EC

Articles - Following the Achmea judgement of the CJEU, the European Commission issued a new document providing guidance on the protection of cross-border EU investments. In this communication, which is not binding from a legal perspective but reflects the EU Commission’s view on this topic, the EU Commission confirms, among others, that the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) arbitration mechanism cannot be applied in a dispute between an EU investor and an EU Member State.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring