Trends

Article 29 WP sceptical on the EU/US Privacy Shield

Article 29 WP sceptical on the EU/US Privacy Shield

Article 29 WP sceptical on the EU/US Privacy Shield

14.04.2016

On 6 October 2015, the CJEU invalidated the U.S. Safe Harbor.

The EU Commission then published a draft adequacy decision on 29 February, putting in place a new legal framework for transatlantic transfers of personal data (the “Privacy Shield”).

Yesterday, the WP29, a body composed of all the EU DPAs, issued its opinion on the Privacy Shield. It welcomes the “significant improvements brought by the Privacy Shield compared to the Safe Harbour decision”. However, it expresses several concerns and urges the Commission to resolve them. The main points of criticism are:

  1. the Privacy Shield package lacks clarity, both in terms of structure and language;
  2. some key EU data protection principles are not reflected, barring a finding of “essential equivalence”; and
  3. within the context of surveillance, there is no clear limitation on massive and indiscriminate collection of personal data originating from the EU.

Although this opinion is not legally binding, it is an important step as regards the ultimate final approval of the Privacy Shield by EU countries. You can find the opinion here.
 

Team

Related news

21.03.2019 NL law
15 aspects of Brexit you did not know

Short Reads - A Brexit without a deal, or with a deal that does not cover all relevant aspects, is still a potential scenario. We have highlighted a number of unexpected legal consequences of Brexit in such a no deal or incomplete deal scenario.

Read more

27.03.2019 NL law
Ook WhatsApp- en sms-berichten op privételefoons vallen onder Wet openbaarheid van bestuur

Short Reads - De Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State heeft in een uitspraak van 20 maart 2019 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:899) bevestigd dat ook WhatsApp- en sms-berichten onder de reikwijdte van de Wet openbaarheid van bestuur (Wob) vallen. Dat geldt niet alleen voor WhatsApp- en sms-berichten die staan op werktelefoons, maar ook voor berichten die staan op privételefoons van bestuurders of ambtenaren. Daarmee gaat de Afdeling terecht verder dan de rechtbank (ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2017:5979) in eerste aanleg, die van oordeel was dat de Wob niet van toepassing is op berichten op privételefoons.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring