umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
bodrum escort
Short Reads

New circular letter confirms income tax neutrality of AIFM Law

New circular letter confirms income tax neutrality of AIFM Law

New circular letter confirms income tax neutrality of AIFM Law

15.09.2015 BE law

The Belgian tax administration has just published a new circular letter pertaining to the income tax treatment of investment companies. The circular letter (click here for the French version and here for the Dutch version) confirms that the Belgian AIFM Law of 19 April 2014 does not have any (adverse) impact on the income tax treatment of several types of Belgian investment vehicles, such e.g. as the SICAV/BEVEK, the SICAF/BEVAK, the private PRICAF/PRIVAK and the SIC/VBS.

As you may be aware, the AIFM Law created some mismatches in cross-references used in the Belgian Income Tax Code (ITC) on the one hand and in the regulatory framework applicable to several types of regulated investment entities on the other hand. This resulted in some uncertainty as to whether after the entry into force of the AIFM Law, these entities would continue to be subject to certain (favorable) tax provisions, such as the special corporate income tax regime provided by Article 185bis ITC and the general withholding tax exemption laid down in Article 116 RD/ITC. The attached circular letter now explicitly confirms that this is indeed the case.

The principle that the AIFM Law does not negatively impact the income tax treatment of e.g. the institutional SIC/VBS has already been confirmed by the Belgian Ruling Commission on various occasions. The present circular letter offers the advantage (i) that it confirms that the ‘income tax neutrality’ of the AIFM Law also applies to other investment company types, such as the SICAV/BEVEK, the SICAF/BEVAK and the private PRICAF/PRIVAK), and (ii) that, at least to a large extent, it takes away the need for investment companies to apply for their own individual tax ruling in order to obtain certainty on their income tax treatment.

For completeness’ sake, please note that the Belgian tax administration already confirmed several months ago that the AIFM Law also does not negatively impact the VAT treatment of Belgian regulated investment companies (please refer to one of our earlier newsletters for more information on this topic).

Team

Related news

01.04.2021 NL law
Public consultation on proposed amendment of Dutch classification rules for certain domestic and foreign legal entities

Short Reads - On 29 March 2021 the Dutch government has released a consultation document (the “Consultation Document”) containing a draft bill of law and explanatory memorandum to amend the Dutch classification rules for certain domestic and foreign legal entities.

Read more

12.03.2021 LU law
Stibbe Luxembourg lawyers co-author the SFDR Implementation Guide

Articles - Edouard d'Anterroches, Audrey Jarreton and Nicolas Pradel co-authored the SFDR Implementation Guide published on 9 March 2021 by the Association des Banques et Banquiers, Luxembourg (ABBL), the Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI) and the Association des Companies d’Assurances et de Réassurances (ACA) for the use of their members.

Read more

09.03.2021 NL law
Consultation on ATAD 2 (reverse hybrids) and amendment arm’s-length principle in the Netherlands

Short Reads - As noted in our earlier Tax Alerts (see our Tax Alerts of March 2017 and July 2019), the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 2 ("ATAD 2") provides for minimum standards to neutralize hybrid mismatches and came into effect in the Netherlands as of 1 January 2020. However, as an exception, the rule that targets so-called “reverse-hybrid” mismatches will become effective only as of 1 January 2022.  

Read more