Articles

Guidance on reassessment of suitability and integrity of policymakers by the dutch financial regulators

Guidance on reassessment of suitability and integrity of policymakers by the dutch financial regulators

Guidance on reassessment of suitability and integrity of policymakers by the dutch financial regulators

08.10.2015 NL law

Board members of Dutch financial undertakings are subject to integrity and/or suitability testing by the Dutch financial supervisory authorities. Suitability and integrity testing aim to promote confidence in the financial sector. 

 

Once a person has been tested and the outcome thereof is positive, the suitability and/or integrity of such person are conclusively established, until a change in relevant facts or circumstances gives reasonable cause for a reassessment. Only limited guidance is available on what may constitute 'changed circumstances', but recent case law provides some guidance.

Background. A board member's suitability is assessed by reviewing a combination of the appointee's CV, job profile, an overview of the knowledge and experience within a management or supervisory role, a description of the selection process and an explanation why the appointee is considered suitable for the position.

The integrity of a board member is assessed on the basis of personal information included in a integrity screening form, and subsequent consultations with other authorities (e.g. the Tax Authorities and the Public Prosecutor).

A reassessment may occur when (i) a change of position occurs, or (ii) a 'change in relevant facts or circumstances give reasonable cause' for a reassessment.

Developments. Recent case law illustrates how the Dutch financial supervisory authorities interpret the concept of 'changed circumstances'. A board member used confidential and price-sensitive information with respect to the introduction of fixed interest rates for long-term liability calculations to enter into profitable transactions for his undertaking. The Dutch Central Bank decided to reassess his suitability and integrity on the basis of these circumstances. The District Court of Rotterdam deemed these circumstances to be a reasonable cause to reassess the board member's suitability and integrity, since the board member was actively involved in (i) sharing the confidential information within his undertaking, and (ii) the decision-making process with respect to the concluded transactions of the financial undertaking.

In another recent case – relating to the same facts and circumstances, but concerning a different board member – the District Court of Rotterdam decided that there is an inseparable connection between suitability and integrity. In that case, the Dutch Central Bank had only considered the board member's suitability, but had failed to reassess his integrity. Furthermore, when making the reassessment, the Dutch Central Bank must take into account the competences of other colleagues in the same organisation and verify whether certain shortcomings of the reassessed person may be offset by the competences of his co-board members.

 

Related news

23.07.2018 NL law
Evaluatie Wbfo en start consultatie over mogelijke wijzigingen/wettelijke maatregelen voor vaste beloning

Short Reads - Op 17 juli 2018 heeft de minister van Financiën de twee rapporten over de evaluatie van de Wet beloningsbeleid financiële ondernemingen (Wbfo) aangeboden aan de Tweede Kamer. Tevens is een maatschappelijke consultatie naar drie wettelijke maatregelen met betrekking tot de vaste beloningen geopend.

Read more

16.07.2018 NL law
ISDA publishes consultation on benchmark fallbacks

Short Reads - ISDA publishes consultation on benchmark fallbacks. As part of an initiative to amend its standard derivatives documentation to facilitate the replacement of existing interbank offered rates (IBORs) by risk free rates (RFRs), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has published a consultation paper on certain adjustments required to such RFRs.

Read more

10.07.2018 EU law
Hof van Justitie EU oordeelt over reikwijdte 'beroepsgeheim' financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens

Articles - In een arrest van 19 juni 2018 oordeelt de Grote kamer van het Hof van Justitie EU over de reikwijdte van het 'beroepsgeheim' van financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens. Het hof oordeelt dat de informatie die zich in het toezichtsdossier bevindt niet onvoorwaardelijk vertrouwelijk van aard is en bijgevolg onder het beroepsgeheim van de toezichthouder valt. Gegevens die mogelijk commerciële geheimen zijn geweest, worden in beginsel geacht niet meer actueel en dus niet langer geheim te zijn, wanneer die gegevens ten minste vijf jaar oud zijn.

Read more

11.07.2018 NL law
Update initiatiefwetsvoorstel introductie instemmingsrecht en aanscherping vaste beloning bankiers

Short Reads - Op 25 april 2018 heeft de Afdeling advisering van de Raad van State (hierna Raad van State) een kritisch advies uitgebracht over het initiatief-wetsvoorstel om de wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft) te wijzigen. Op 5 juli 2018 is dit advies tezamen met de reactie van de initiatiefnemers van het wetsvoorstel op het advies van de Raad van State gepubliceerd, evenals het aangepaste wetsvoorstel dat is aangeboden aan de Tweede Kamer.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring