Articles

ESMA advises on AIFMD third country regime

ESMA advises on AIFMD third country regime

ESMA advises on AIFMD third country regime

08.10.2015 NL law

Currently, non-EU fund managers do not have access to an EU marketing passport under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive. They will have to comply with the national private placement regimes if they want to market in the EU. In the course 2015, it was intended that a harmonised passport regime would become available to non-EU fund managers and funds. 

The European Securities and Markets Authority was asked for its opinion on the functioning of the EU marketing passport and national private placement regimes, and for its advice on the application of the AIFMD passport to non-EU fund managers and funds. Recently, ESMA published its guidance.

Since the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive ("AIFMD") came into force on 22 July 2013, 12 Member States have allowed non-EU AIFMs to market EU AIFs (the Netherlands , the UK, Luxembourg, Portugal, Austria, Ireland, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Lithuania, Malta and Cyprus), and the same 12 Member States plus Greece and Hungary have allowed EU AIFMs to market non-EU AIFs.

In total, 1,770 non-EU AIFMs market 4,356 AIFs in the EU in accordance with Article 42 of the AIFMD. Another 300 EU AIFMS market 1,146 non EU AIFs in the EU in accordance with Article 36 of the AIFMD.

National private placement regimes

EU AIFMs that have obtained an AIFMD licence are allowed to market in other EU Member States with a marketing passport. The AIFM can obtain such a passport through its home state regulator. Such a marketing passport is not yet available for non-EU AIFMs. They need to comply with the national private placement regime of each of the Member States where the AIFs are marketed or managed.

A non-EU AIFM intending to market an AIF in the Netherlands can make use of the Dutch private placement regime, subject to the following conditions:

  • the AIF is marketed to qualified investors only (within the meaning of MiFID);
  • the AIFM and AIF are located in countries which have entered into cooperation agreements with the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten); and
  • these countries are not listed by the Financial Action Task Force as non-cooperative jurisdictions.

The private placement regime rules in the Netherlands result from the implementation of Article 42 of the AIFMD.

It was intended that these national private placement regimes would exist for a five-year transitional period. After two years, a harmonised passport regime would become available to non-EU AIFMs performing management and/or marketing activities within the EU and EU AIFMs managing non-EU AIFs. Then in the following three years, two parallel marketing routes would be available to non-EU AIFMs. In 2018, the national regimes will terminated and only the EU marketing passport will be available.

Recently, ESMA published its opinion on the functioning of the passport for EU AIFMs and the national private placement regimes and its advice on the application of the AIFMD passport to non‑EU AIFMs and AIFs.

ESMA's opinion on the functioning of the EU marketing passport and of the national private placement regimes

As regards the functioning of the EU marketing passport, ESMA expressed some concerns in relation to divergent approaches with respect to marketing rules and the definition of what constitutes a 'professional investor'. In addition, ESMA identified several issues regarding varying interpretations of what activities constitute ‘marketing’ and ‘material changes’ in the Member States. ESMA sees merit in harmonising in the definition of these terms. With respect to the functioning of the national private placement regime, ESMA is of the view that no major issues have raised in terms of the functioning and implementation of the AIFMD framework. However, ESMA did note that the delay in the transposition of the AIFMD made it difficult to arrive at a definitive assessment.

ESMA's advice on the application of the EU marketing passport to non-EU AIFMs and AIFs

In its advice, ESMA considered the potential extension of the EU marketing passport to six non-EU countries: Guernsey, Hong Kong, Jersey, Switzerland, Singapore and the United States.

According to ESMA, the passport can be made available to AIFMs and AIFs in Guernsey and Jersey. ESMA's advice for Switzerland is also positive. No definitive view was expressed with respect to Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States because of concerns related to competition, regulatory issues and insufficient information to properly assess the relevant criteria.

ESMA advised the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission to suspend their decision on the potential application of the EU marketing passport to Hong Kong, Singapore and the US.

 

Related news

15.10.2021 NL law
BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

Short Reads - Recently, the Dutch bill for the implementation of BRRD II (i.e. Directive (EU) 2014/59 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/879) in the Netherlands was submitted to Dutch Parliament, where it is currently under debate.

Read more

01.10.2021 NL law
Vanaf 1 oktober strengere regelgeving voor verkoop van turbo’s aan particuliere beleggers

Short Reads - Turbobeleggers nemen veel risico’s en verliezen gemiddeld veel geld. De AFM vindt dat particuliere beleggers onvoldoende beschermd worden tegen de risico’s van turbo’s. De verkoop van turbo’s aan deze beleggers wordt daarom aan banden gelegd. Met ingang van 1 oktober geldt een hefboombeperking, een verplichte risicowaarschuwing en een verbod op handelsbonussen. Daarmee wil de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) particuliere beleggers beter beschermen tegen de risico’s van turbo’s.

Read more

14.10.2021 NL law
NFTs: New legal challenges on the horizon

Short Reads - Non-Fungible Tokens, widely known as NFTs, have recently gained much attention due to their role in the transfer of digital artworks. The market for NFTs grew from USD 13.5m in the first six months of 2020 to USD 2.5bn in the first half of 2021 and is still growing at an expansive rate. Notwithstanding their increasing popularity in the world of art, NFTs have many potential applications. In this blog Maciek Bednarski, Annemijn Witkam and Roderik Vrolijk explain what NFTs are and describe some of the legal challenges they will bring about.

Read more

20.09.2021 NL law
AFM: Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid

Articles - Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid. De informatieverschaffing van fondsen over duurzaamheidsrisico’s en duurzaamheidskenmerken is nog vaak te algemeen, daardoor krijgen beleggers te weinig inzicht in waar ze in investeren. Dat is een van de conclusies van de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) in een verkennend onderzoek naar de toepassing van de Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

Read more

11.10.2021 NL law
Vervolgonderzoek van de AFM naar incidentmeldingen door asset managers

Articles - Sinds de uitbraak van het coronavirus wordt ook in de financiële sector meer op afstand samengewerkt. Dat brengt specifieke risico’s met zich mee. De Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) gaat daarom vervolgonderzoek doen naar het melden van incidenten door asset managers. De reden is het uitblijven van een stijging van het aantal incidentmeldingen ondanks herhaalde oproepen daartoe.

Read more