Articles

Dutch MPs Henk Nijboer and Ed Groot (PvdA) present initiative policy document on "harmful" private equity

Dutch MPs Henk Nijboer and Ed Groot (PvdA) present initiative policy document on "harmful" private equity

Dutch MPs Henk Nijboer and Ed Groot (PvdA) present initiative policy document on "harmful" private equity

08.10.2015 NL law

On 24 August 2015, members of the Dutch Parliament Henk Nijboer, financial spokesman for the Dutch Labour Party (Partij van de Arbeid), and Ed Groot, fiscal spokesman for the Dutch Labour Party, presented an initiative policy document (initiatiefnota) containing a proposal for measures aimed at the protection of Dutch companies against "harmful" private equity firms that invest in target companies for the sole purpose of extracting as much money as possible therefrom. 

The proposed measures consist of changes to tax treatment of acquisition debt as well as changes to existing corporate legislation.

Initiative Policy Document Private Equity: a halt to excesses (Parliament II 34267, no. 2)

According to the authors of the policy document a significant number of private equity firms acquire businesses for the sole purpose of realizing as much profit as possible within a short timeframe. As a result, such companies, bereft of their (liquid) assets coupled with external factors, such as market circumstances, have little chance of survival on their own. HEMA, NRC Media, Van Gansewinkel, Atteró, Estro and V&D are portrayed as examples. The extraction of assets from target companies, the making of super dividends to their new shareholders and the invoicing of high, opaque (management) costs are identified by the authors as excesses which must be brought to a halt. In addition, the authors point out that Dutch tax payers, as a result of interest deductibility constructions, end up paying for risks that should be borne by the investors. The policy document provides a proposal for a number of measures, including the following.

  • Tax deductibility of interest on acquisition debt should be further limited.
  • Financial indebtedness assumed by target companies for purposes of the acquisition should not be eligible for tax deductibility of interest.
  • Target companies should be prohibited from creating security over their assets as security for the acquisition debt.
  • Target companies should be prohibited from providing loans to their new shareholders if the proceeds of such loans are applied towards repayment of the acquisition debt.
  • Reinforcement of the position of works councils in order to provide them with greater insight in the acquisition financing and the potential to verify whether its advice in connection with the acquisition is implemented in the acquisition plans.
  • Works councils must be entitled to directly request information from the target company's external auditor.
  • Parliament should request the government for its opinion on the adequacy of existing rules on directors' and officers' liability and whether it believes that additional groups should be entitled to request an investigation into a company's policy in order to protect the interests of employees and society as a whole.

According to the authors, the main purpose of the policy document is the protection and reinforcement of the Rhineland stakeholders model by means of implementing the proposed measures, as a result of which:

  1. the investors instead of the tax payer bear the risk of high acquisition debt interest;
  2. the potential to obtain "excessive" debt financing and to weaken a target company's balance sheet will be limited;
  3. the influence of employees will be strengthened; and
  4. the costs and the earnings model of private equity firms will be made transparent.

It is noted that some of the proposed measures are contrary to recent legislative amendments, such as the 2012 abolition of the former financial assistance prohibition for Dutch private companies with limited liability (besloten vennootschappen met beperkte aansprakelijkheid) within the context of the so-called "flex-BV" legislation. As such, implementation of the proposed measures would seem inconsistent with previous policy.

In a meeting of the Permanent Parliamentary Committee of Finance (Vaste Commissie Financiën) with the Dutch Minister of Finance Mr Dijsselbloem held on 7 September 2015, Mr Dijsselbloem confirmed that the government will respond to the initiative policy document prior to the end of this year.

Related news

15.10.2021 NL law
BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

Short Reads - Recently, the Dutch bill for the implementation of BRRD II (i.e. Directive (EU) 2014/59 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/879) in the Netherlands was submitted to Dutch Parliament, where it is currently under debate.

Read more

01.10.2021 NL law
Vanaf 1 oktober strengere regelgeving voor verkoop van turbo’s aan particuliere beleggers

Short Reads - Turbobeleggers nemen veel risico’s en verliezen gemiddeld veel geld. De AFM vindt dat particuliere beleggers onvoldoende beschermd worden tegen de risico’s van turbo’s. De verkoop van turbo’s aan deze beleggers wordt daarom aan banden gelegd. Met ingang van 1 oktober geldt een hefboombeperking, een verplichte risicowaarschuwing en een verbod op handelsbonussen. Daarmee wil de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) particuliere beleggers beter beschermen tegen de risico’s van turbo’s.

Read more

14.10.2021 NL law
NFTs: New legal challenges on the horizon

Short Reads - Non-Fungible Tokens, widely known as NFTs, have recently gained much attention due to their role in the transfer of digital artworks. The market for NFTs grew from USD 13.5m in the first six months of 2020 to USD 2.5bn in the first half of 2021 and is still growing at an expansive rate. Notwithstanding their increasing popularity in the world of art, NFTs have many potential applications. In this blog Maciek Bednarski, Annemijn Witkam and Roderik Vrolijk explain what NFTs are and describe some of the legal challenges they will bring about.

Read more

20.09.2021 NL law
AFM: Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid

Articles - Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid. De informatieverschaffing van fondsen over duurzaamheidsrisico’s en duurzaamheidskenmerken is nog vaak te algemeen, daardoor krijgen beleggers te weinig inzicht in waar ze in investeren. Dat is een van de conclusies van de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) in een verkennend onderzoek naar de toepassing van de Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

Read more

11.10.2021 NL law
Vervolgonderzoek van de AFM naar incidentmeldingen door asset managers

Articles - Sinds de uitbraak van het coronavirus wordt ook in de financiële sector meer op afstand samengewerkt. Dat brengt specifieke risico’s met zich mee. De Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) gaat daarom vervolgonderzoek doen naar het melden van incidenten door asset managers. De reden is het uitblijven van een stijging van het aantal incidentmeldingen ondanks herhaalde oproepen daartoe.

Read more