umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
bodrum escort
Articles

Unintended banking licence exception

Unintended banking licence exception

Unintended banking licence exception

01.07.2015 NL law

On 1 January 2015, the group finance companies exemption as set out in the Dutch Financial Supervision Act was amended. The same day, another exception to the Dutch licence requirement for providing banking services was inadvertently included in Section 2:11(2) of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act. On 1 July 2015, the Dutch legislator announced it planned to correct this by deleting the aforementioned subsection.

Background

On 1 January 2015, the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht, the “Wft”) introduced stricter conditions of the group finance companies exemption. These conditions are set out in Section 3:2 Wft. In addition, the Dutch legislator mistakenly included a new exception to the requirement to obtain a banking licence for providing banking services in Section 2:11(2)(b) Wft. Pursuant to this new exception, there is no requirement to obtain a banking licence if Section 3:5 Wft is not applicable. Section 3:5 Wft contains the prohibition to attract, obtain or hold repayable funds from the public.

Relevance

One of the exceptions to the prohibition to attract, obtain or hold repayable funds from the public occurs when a person attracts, obtains or holds these funds as a result of offering securities to the public in accordance with the requirements of part 5.1 Wft (the requirements of the Prospectus Directive). As a result of the new exception to the banking licence requirement that entered into force on 1 January 2015 (Section 2:11(2)(b)), any person offering securities in accordance with the requirements of part 5.1 Wft is exempt from the requirement to obtain a banking licence to provide banking services.

This would mean that issuing institutions are permitted to provide banking services. The Dutch legislator has now explained that this new exception in Section 2:11(2) was included by mistake and has proposed to correct this by deleting the exception form the Wft.

Related news

12.03.2021 LU law
Stibbe Luxembourg lawyers co-author the SFDR Implementation Guide

Articles - Edouard d'Anterroches, Audrey Jarreton and Nicolas Pradel co-authored the SFDR Implementation Guide published on 9 March 2021 by the Association des Banques et Banquiers, Luxembourg (ABBL), the Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI) and the Association des Companies d’Assurances et de Réassurances (ACA) for the use of their members.

Read more

24.02.2021 NL law
How certain elements of the Dutch scheme may (or may not) affect ISDA Master Agreements

Articles - On 1 January 2021, the legislative framework for court-approved restructurings of debts outside formal insolvency proceedings (hereafter referred to as the ‘Dutch scheme’, or simply, the ‘scheme’) entered into force. Under the Dutch scheme a debt restructuring plan can be submitted to the creditors for voting, whereby a majority can bind a minority within each class of creditors and the competent court has the power to make the plan binding on dissenting classes of creditors.

Read more

22.02.2021 EU law
EU Regulator’s response to the Reddit rally

Short Reads - A massive stock market rally recently suddenly developed with respect to GameStop’s shares, a moribund chain of video game stores in the United States. The instigators: users of the investment forum r/wallstreetbets on Reddit. On 17 February 2021, the European Securities and Markets Authority delivered its strongest warning yet about the risks of using social media for investing, cautioning that any effort to coordinate trades online could violate EU market abuse regulations.

Read more