Articles

Transitional regime available for group finance companies

Transitional regime available for group finance companies

Transitional regime available for group finance companies

01.07.2015 NL law

Group finance companies are exempt from the requirement to obtain a banking licence provided that the conditions laid down in Section 3:2 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act are met. These finance companies attract funding in the market and lend the proceeds to their group companies. 

Section 3:2 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act was amended at the beginning of the year, which led to clarification of the conditions. In addition, the exemption no longer applies if the main business of the group is providing financing to third parties. A transitional regime applies to companies that attracted funding in the market prior to 1 January 2015.

Background

A transitional regime has been created in relation to the amended rules for group finance companies. The transitional regime is available for agreements entered into before 1 January 2015. The old Section 3:2 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht, the “Wft”) continues to apply to agreements on attracting transferable debt securities from the public in accordance with Chapter 5.1 of the Wft, which were entered into before 1 January 2015. Chapter 5.1 of the Wft contains the implementation of the EU Prospectus Directive.

Furthermore, group finance companies with their statutory seat in the Netherlands that relied on the exemption set out in the old Section 3:2 Wft and were exempted from prudential supervision prior to 1 January 2015 do not need to obtain a banking licence.  

These group finance companies must now demonstrate that they comply with the conditions laid down in Section 3:2 Wft within six months of the Financial Markets Amendment Act 2015 (Wijzigingswet financiële markten 2015) coming into effect . Group finance companies that fail to comply with this requirement must obtain a banking licence.

Relevance

The banking licence exemption is frequently used by group finance companies. This development is relevant, for example, to group finance companies that are part of a group whose main business is providing financing to third parties. Group finance companies that attracted funds from the public as funding for a licensed bank in the group can no longer make use of the exemption.

Having said this, the Dutch Central Bank has confirmed that group finance companies that comply with the conditions of the previous and current Section 3:2 Wft are not required to take any action and do not need to notify the Dutch Central Bank. They will only have to demonstrate that they comply with the conditions laid down in Section 3:2 Wft upon request of the Dutch Central Bank.

An exemption from the requirement to obtain a banking licence is available if a group finance company attracts funding from the public provided that:

  1. funding is obtained through the issuance of transferable debt securities in accordance with Chapter 5.1 Wft;
  2. at least 95% of the proceeds are extended to group companies;
  3. the main business of the group does not consist of providing financing to third parties; and
  4. the obligations of the finance companies are guaranteed by (i) a parent guarantee, (ii) a keep-well agreement issued by the parent, or (iii) a  bank guarantee.

If a parent guarantee or a keep-well agreement is issued, the parent company must further ensure that a group finance company is in a position to satisfy its obligations to pay the repayable funds it has attracted from the public. Although there is little guidance on this requirement set out in Section 3:2(2) Wft, it appears to be a best efforts obligation for the parent company to check whether or not the subsidiary will be able to meet its obligations prior to providing a guarantee. It follows from Section 3:2(2) Wft that this condition is, in any event, met when a bank guarantee is provided. Even though group finance companies that comply with the previous and current conditions of Section 3:2 Wft are not required to pro-actively approach DNB, careful monitoring of compliance with the conditions for the exemption remains important. 

Related news

15.10.2021 NL law
BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

Short Reads - Recently, the Dutch bill for the implementation of BRRD II (i.e. Directive (EU) 2014/59 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/879) in the Netherlands was submitted to Dutch Parliament, where it is currently under debate.

Read more

01.10.2021 NL law
Vanaf 1 oktober strengere regelgeving voor verkoop van turbo’s aan particuliere beleggers

Short Reads - Turbobeleggers nemen veel risico’s en verliezen gemiddeld veel geld. De AFM vindt dat particuliere beleggers onvoldoende beschermd worden tegen de risico’s van turbo’s. De verkoop van turbo’s aan deze beleggers wordt daarom aan banden gelegd. Met ingang van 1 oktober geldt een hefboombeperking, een verplichte risicowaarschuwing en een verbod op handelsbonussen. Daarmee wil de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) particuliere beleggers beter beschermen tegen de risico’s van turbo’s.

Read more

14.10.2021 NL law
NFTs: New legal challenges on the horizon

Short Reads - Non-Fungible Tokens, widely known as NFTs, have recently gained much attention due to their role in the transfer of digital artworks. The market for NFTs grew from USD 13.5m in the first six months of 2020 to USD 2.5bn in the first half of 2021 and is still growing at an expansive rate. Notwithstanding their increasing popularity in the world of art, NFTs have many potential applications. In this blog Maciek Bednarski, Annemijn Witkam and Roderik Vrolijk explain what NFTs are and describe some of the legal challenges they will bring about.

Read more

20.09.2021 NL law
AFM: Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid

Articles - Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid. De informatieverschaffing van fondsen over duurzaamheidsrisico’s en duurzaamheidskenmerken is nog vaak te algemeen, daardoor krijgen beleggers te weinig inzicht in waar ze in investeren. Dat is een van de conclusies van de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) in een verkennend onderzoek naar de toepassing van de Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

Read more

11.10.2021 NL law
Vervolgonderzoek van de AFM naar incidentmeldingen door asset managers

Articles - Sinds de uitbraak van het coronavirus wordt ook in de financiële sector meer op afstand samengewerkt. Dat brengt specifieke risico’s met zich mee. De Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) gaat daarom vervolgonderzoek doen naar het melden van incidenten door asset managers. De reden is het uitblijven van een stijging van het aantal incidentmeldingen ondanks herhaalde oproepen daartoe.

Read more