Short Reads

Judges must in certain circumstances set aside final judgments at a national level in order to prevent illegal State aid

Judges must in certain circumstances set aside final judgments at a national level in order to prevent illegal State aid

Judges must in certain circumstances set aside final judgments at a national level in order to prevent illegal State aid

08.12.2015 NL law

On 11 November 2015, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ“) ruled in case C-505/14 (Klausner Holz) that national judges should, in certain circumstances, set aside a final judgment establishing the validity of a contract if the enforcement of the contract amounts to illegal State aid. 

In particular, the ECJ held that if the final judgment did not address any of the State aid characteristics and was left intact this would undermine European law because it prevents a finding of State aid. This recent ruling means that obtaining a final judgment (also known as res judicata or as gezag van gewijsde in the Netherlands) is not always conclusive for parties conducting business with government entities.

Facts

The Forestry Administration of the Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (“FAL“) entered into an agreement to sell fixed quantities of wood to Klausner Holz Group between 2007 and 2014. The FAL agreed to refrain from selling at prices lower than those set out in the agreement, which was also supplemented by a framework sales contract (“contracts“).

Shortly after the agreement was implemented, difficulties arose between the parties. The FAL supplied wood to Klausner Holz between 2007 and 2008, but it failed to supply the amount of wood in accordance with the contracts. Klausner Holz experienced financial difficulties in 2008, which resulted in occasional late payments. Eventually, in 2009, the FAL rescinded the contracts and stopped supplying wood. Klausner Holz issued proceedings in which a declaratory judgment was made, ruling that the contracts should remain in force. After an unsuccessful appeal by the FAL, this judgment became final.

Klausner Holz then issued further proceedings, seeking damages in the sum of EUR 54 million and an order for the FAL to adhere to its contractual obligation to supply wood. Ultimately, however, the Court agreed with FAL’s argument that enforcement of the contracts would amount to State aid. As the principle ofres judicata under German law prevents a departure from the judgment reached in the first proceedings, the Court requested a preliminary ruling from the ECJ on how to solve the conflict between the principle of res judicata and requirements to prevent the implementation of illegal State aid.

The judgment of the ECJ

First, the ECJ reiterated settled case law that obliges Member States to refrain from implementing measures that may amount to illegal State aid until the European Commission has issued a final decision on the compatibility of the aid with the internal market ( “standstill obligation“), to which national judges are bound.

Secondly, the ECJ pointed out that the first German judgment (i) did not concern whether enforcement of the contracts qualified as State aid, and (ii) was primarily aimed at assessing whether the contracts remained in force, despite the fact the FAL had rescinded them. The ECJ also emphasized that national judges should interpret national law in conformity with European law. The ECJ however acknowledged that interpretation of national law is subject to certain limitations and cannot be used in a way that contradicts its core meaning. The referring Court maintained that German law prevented it from overruling a final (national) judgment despite its possible contradiction with European law.

According to the ECJ, national judges should take into account the principle of effectiveness, which ensures the effective application of European law. Given the circumstances in the case, the judgment concluded that the principle of res judicata was contrary to the principle of effectiveness. As a consequence, the referring Court was bound to apply the State aid rules, which prohibited the enforcement of the contracts.

It is important to note that in other situations the ECJ has ruled that European law does not always require judges to set aside final judgments at a national level. For example, the case of C-69/14 (Târșia) established that European law does not require a revision of the final judgment if it is found to be incompatible with an interpretation of European law upheld by the ECJ after the date on which the judgment became final.

Conclusion   

This preliminary ruling illustrates how government entities can avoid contractual obligations by invoking State aid rules. If the final judgment does not explicitly address State aid, it cannot provide full legal certainty for the parties because this may be a reason to depart from the judgment at a later stage. This is relevant since State aid rules are often invoked by the government. Only a few months ago, for instance, the District Court of North Holland ruled that the sale of land by a private party to a municipality constituted State aid. The municipality had issued the proceedings with the purpose of seeking a declaratory judgment that the sale amounted to State aid.

In light of this development, parties concluding contracts with government entities should consider protecting themselves by including contractual provisions in case State aid rules are raised. Depending on the circumstances it is for example advisable to include a provision in the contract that obliges the government entity to notify the European Commission so it can assess whether the State aid is compatible with the internal market to help ensure enforcement of the contract.

We will review this preliminary ruling for the Gemeentestem, a Dutch legal journal.

The post ‘Judges must in certain circumstances set aside final judgments at a national level in order to prevent illegal State aid’ is a post of Stibbeblog.

Team

Related news

05.10.2018 NL law
Presentaties seminar Dienstenrichtlijn en Detailhandel

Articles - Met het arrest van het Europese Hof van Justitie en de vervolguitspraak van de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State in de zaak Visser Vastgoed in Appingedam is vast komen te staan dat de Dienstenrichtlijn van toepassing is op bestemmingsplannen die detailhandel reguleren.

Read more

10.10.2018 NL law
Ongevraagd advies Raad van State: normering van geautomatiseerde overheidsbesluitvorming

Short Reads - Op 31 augustus 2018 heeft de Afdeling advisering van de Raad van State (hierna: "Afdeling advisering") een 'Ongevraagd advies over de effecten van de digitalisering voor de rechtsstatelijke verhoudingen' betreffende de positie en de bescherming van de burger tegen een "iOverheid" uitgebracht. Het gebeurt niet vaak dat de Afdeling advisering zo een ongevraagd advies uitbrengt. Dit onderstreept het belang van de voortdurend in ontwikkeling zijnde technologie en digitalisering in relatie tot de verhouding tussen de overheid en de maatschappij.

Read more

04.10.2018 BE law
Nieuw tijdperk voor Vlaamse woonreserves aangebroken

Articles - De Vlaamse regering beoogt het wettelijk kader in de zogenaamde "woonresergebieden" (waaronder de woonuitbreidingsgebieden) grondig te wijzigen. Ofwel krijgen de gebieden de volwaardige status als woongebied, ofwel krijgen ze een andere bestemming dan wonen. De regeling laat toe om gemeenten voor een openruimtebestemming te laten kiezen. Hierna een overzicht van het voorstel van de Vlaamse regering en de reactie van de adviesraden op het voorstel.

Read more

08.10.2018 NL law
Een nieuw VN-verdrag met al bestaande verplichtingen over mensenrechten en bedrijfsleven?

Short Reads - Na een langdurig onderhandelingsproces is op 19 juni 2018 een eerste conceptversie van een  VN-verdrag over mensenrechten en bedrijfsleven bekendgemaakt. Dit verdrag staat in het teken van een nieuwe benadering van de relatie tussen de plicht van Staten om mensenrechten te beschermen en de verantwoordelijkheid van bedrijven om specifiek ten aanzien van mensenrechten maatschappelijk verantwoord te ondernemen. Vraag is echter of er juridisch veel nieuws onder de zon is.

Read more

03.10.2018 NL law
Zijn tijdelijke omgevingsvergunningen voor zonneparken verleden tijd door wijziging subsidieregeling?

Short Reads - Tijdelijke zonneparken zijn snel vergunbaar, zo oordeelde de rechtbank Zwolle in haar uitspraak waarbij een tijdelijke omgevingsvergunning voor een zonnepark in Staphorst werd aangevochten. De rechtbank volgt daarmee de lijn van de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak. Onlangs is echter de SDE+-subsidieregeling gewijzigd, waardoor projecten met een tijdelijke omgevingsvergunning van subsidie worden uitgesloten. Komt er daarmee een einde aan de oprichting van tijdelijke zonneparken?

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring