Articles

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

30.04.2015 NL law

The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam had correctly applied applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness, which provide that the termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to such standards, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand. 


In addition, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had not misapplied the standards of reasonableness and fairness by weighing the interests of the bank and the borrower against each other and had duly taken into account the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to the applicable general terms and conditions.

Dutch Supreme Court, 10 October 2014 (ECLI:NL:HR:2014:2929)

The bank was the lender under a credit agreement providing for an overdraft facility with an indefinite term and two fixed-rate loans with defined maturity dates. The applicable general terms and conditions included a provision for the automatic termination of the credit agreement and the loans becoming immediately due in the event of a payment default by the borrower. In 2009, the bank informed the borrower that it would terminate the credit agreement stating that the borrower had not complied with certain of its obligations. 

The Court of Appeal in Amsterdam ruled that the termination of the fixed-rate loans on the basis of the automatic termination provision was invalid. The Court of Appeal held that invocation by the bank of the automatic termination provision was contrary to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness when taking into account the interests of the bank and the borrower, and given the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to its general terms and conditions. The Court of Appeal ruled that the bank had terminated the fixed-rate loans without taking due care of the justified interests of the borrower, and that the bank's own interest in terminating the fixed-rate loans was limited considering its comfortable credit and security position against the borrower. The bank filed an appeal with the Dutch Supreme Court.

The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had correctly applied the standards of reasonableness and fairness, which provide that the termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to such standards, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand. In addition, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had not misapplied the standards of reasonableness and fairness by weighing the interests of the bank and the borrower against each other and taking into account the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to the applicable general terms and conditions. Accordingly, the Dutch Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam.

The ruling serves as a reminder that a termination provision included in a credit agreement may not be validly invoked by the lender if the invocation thereof, based on the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, conflicts with applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness. The judgment provides additional clarity on how those standards of reasonableness and fairness may be applied to the termination of a credit agreement and which facts and circumstances may be taken into account.

Related news

21.07.2020 NL law
Financiële sector moet klimaatrisico’s bespreken met klanten

Short Reads - Financiële instellingen moeten in gesprekken met klanten aandacht besteden aan klimaatrisico’s. Bij zakelijke klanten met name over de mogelijke impact van klimaatrisico’s op hun bedrijfsvoering en bij hypotheekeigenaren bijvoorbeeld over de verduurzaming van hun woning. Ook in het licht van het Klimaatcommitment van de financiële sector is dit van belang. Dit blijkt uit een bloemlezing van acht Nederlandse financiële instellingen, verenigd onder het Platform voor Duurzame financiering.

Read more

29.06.2020 NL law
European Banking Federation Guidance on testing of Cloud Exit Strategy

Short Reads - Financial institutions may outsource critical or important functions to cloud service providers (“CSPs”). On 25 February 2019 the European Banking Authority (“EBA”) provided guidelines (the “EBA Guidelines”) laying out the framework for outsourcing arrangements. The EBA Guidelines require institutions to have a comprehensive, documented and sufficiently tested exit strategy (including a mandatory exit plan) when they outsource critical or important functions.

Read more

29.06.2020 NL law
Nieuwe publicaties van het netwerk van centrale banken en toezichthouders

Short Reads - Het Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) benadrukt opnieuw het toenemende belang van klimaatverandering voor centrale banken en toezichthouders. Klimaatverandering leidt tot financiële risico’s en dat betekent dat centrale banken en toezichthouders klimaat- en milieugerelateerde risico’s in hun beleid en toezicht moeten integreren.

Read more

26.06.2020 EU law
E-book: 'Practical implications of ESG disclosure regulations'

Articles - As of 10 March 2021, many financial market participants and financial advisers will be subject to new disclosure obligations following the entry into force of the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) on 29 December 2019. The SFDR sets rules on transparency with a view to promoting both the integration of sustainability risks into investment processes and disclosures to investors.

Read more