Articles

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

30.04.2015 NL law

The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam had correctly applied applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness, which provide that the termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to such standards, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand. 


In addition, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had not misapplied the standards of reasonableness and fairness by weighing the interests of the bank and the borrower against each other and had duly taken into account the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to the applicable general terms and conditions.

Dutch Supreme Court, 10 October 2014 (ECLI:NL:HR:2014:2929)

The bank was the lender under a credit agreement providing for an overdraft facility with an indefinite term and two fixed-rate loans with defined maturity dates. The applicable general terms and conditions included a provision for the automatic termination of the credit agreement and the loans becoming immediately due in the event of a payment default by the borrower. In 2009, the bank informed the borrower that it would terminate the credit agreement stating that the borrower had not complied with certain of its obligations. 

The Court of Appeal in Amsterdam ruled that the termination of the fixed-rate loans on the basis of the automatic termination provision was invalid. The Court of Appeal held that invocation by the bank of the automatic termination provision was contrary to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness when taking into account the interests of the bank and the borrower, and given the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to its general terms and conditions. The Court of Appeal ruled that the bank had terminated the fixed-rate loans without taking due care of the justified interests of the borrower, and that the bank's own interest in terminating the fixed-rate loans was limited considering its comfortable credit and security position against the borrower. The bank filed an appeal with the Dutch Supreme Court.

The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had correctly applied the standards of reasonableness and fairness, which provide that the termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to such standards, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand. In addition, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had not misapplied the standards of reasonableness and fairness by weighing the interests of the bank and the borrower against each other and taking into account the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to the applicable general terms and conditions. Accordingly, the Dutch Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam.

The ruling serves as a reminder that a termination provision included in a credit agreement may not be validly invoked by the lender if the invocation thereof, based on the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, conflicts with applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness. The judgment provides additional clarity on how those standards of reasonableness and fairness may be applied to the termination of a credit agreement and which facts and circumstances may be taken into account.

Related news

27.09.2019 NL law
Stibbe is attending the IBA's annual conference in Seoul

Conference - The annual conference of the International Bar Association (IBA) is currently taking place in Seoul. There are fourteen partners from Stibbe attending the event. Several of them have speaking slots on a wide range of legal topics and will take part in various panel discussions.

Read more

06.09.2019 NL law
Supervision of crypto services

Short Reads - On 3 September 2019, De Nederlandsche Bank ("DNB") published a press release in which DNB points out to providers of crypto services that they should prepare for imminent DNB supervision. Companies facilitating the exchange of crypto currency for normal money and companies that offer crypto wallets will have to comply with a registration obligation from the beginning of 2020.

Read more

25.09.2019 NL law
The long arm of regulation – Dutch chapter by Roderik Vrolijk and Senna Leentjens

Articles - The continued global scrutiny of financial services firms, alongside the sustained pressure on those charged with regulating them to deliver tangible results, continues to drive financial services regulators to seek assistance from their overseas counterparts when investigating issues. This trend shows no signs of abating, and questions such as how and when regulators interact with each other and with firms across borders, how firms are expected or required to respond, and whether duplicate proceedings can be brought in different jurisdictions are more pertinent than ever.

Read more

07.08.2019 NL law
Roderik Vrolijk and Soeradj Ramsanjhal in Global Legal Insights - FinTech Edition 2019

Articles - Roderik Vrolijk and Soeradj Ramsanjhal have contributed to the 2019 FinTech edition of Global Legal Insights (GLI), providing the Netherlands chapter. The GLI FinTech 2019 edition covers approaches and developments in the FinTech sector with respect to regulatory and insurance technology, regulatory bodies, key regulations and regulatory approaches, restrictions and cross-border business in 26 jurisdictions.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring