Articles

Dutch Supreme Court reconsiders its 1989 Vis q.q./NMB Judgment: all money transfers credited to a payee's bank account after bankruptcy of the payor must be reimbursed to the payor's bankrupt estate

Dutch Supreme Court reconsiders its 1989 Vis q.q./NMB Judgment: all money transfers credited to a payee's bank account after bankruptcy of the payor must be reimbursed to the payor's bankrupt estate

Dutch Supreme Court reconsiders its 1989 Vis q.q./NMB Judgment: all money transfers credited to a payee's bank account after bankruptcy of the payor must be reimbursed to the payor's bankrupt estate

30.04.2015 NL law

In a judgment dated 20 March 2015, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that all banks and intermediaries involved in the execution of a bank transfer, including the bank responsible for recording receipt of the bank transfer into the account held with it by the payee, qualify as parties whose services are directly or indirectly used by the payor in connection with the bank transfer. 

Therefore, according to the Dutch Supreme Court, all bank transfers initiated before, but credited to a payee's bank account after, bankruptcy of the payor are now eligible for reimbursement to the payor's bankrupt estate upon demand by the bankruptcy administrator.

Dutch Supreme Court 20 March 2015 (ECLI:NL:HR:2015:689)

One of the general principles of Dutch bankruptcy law is that a bankrupt debtor can no longer dispose of any assets belonging to his bankrupt estate from the date bankruptcy is declared. In its 1989 Vis q.q./NMB judgment, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that a bank transfer received by a creditor of a bankrupt debtor must be reimbursed to the bankrupt estate if, on the day of bankruptcy, the bank processing that bank transfer on behalf of the bankrupt debtor (the "Payor's Bank") had not yet completed all necessary actions in order to effect the bank transfer. The actions to be carried out by the Payor's Bank generally include (i) debiting the account held by the payor and, if the bank account of the payee is held with another Dutch bank (the "Payee's Bank"), (ii) debiting the account held by the Payor's Bank with the Dutch Central Bank, and (iii) instructing the Dutch Central Bank to credit the account held by the Payee's Bank with the Dutch Central Bank. In order to complete the bank transfer, the Payee's Bank must credit the bank account held with it by the payee. Pursuant to the 1989 Vis q.q./NMB judgment, a bank transfer received by a payee after a payor's bankruptcy was deemed final if the Payor's Bank had completed the actions to be taken by it prior to the date of bankruptcy, irrespective of whether the Payee's Bank had credited the bank account held with it by the payee.

In its recent judgment, the Dutch Supreme Court held that all banks and intermediaries involved in the execution of a bank transfer, including the Payee's Bank, qualify as parties whose services are directly or indirectly used by the payor in connection with the bank transfer. Therefore, according to the Dutch Supreme Court, all bank transfers credited to a payee's bank account on or after the day of bankruptcy of the payor are now eligible for reimbursement to the payor's bankrupt estate upon demand by the bankruptcy administrator.

The Dutch Supreme Court creates a simple (and bankruptcy administrator-friendly) new rule to assess whether or not a bank transfer made by a bankrupt payor must be reimbursed to the bankrupt estate: if the bank transfer is initiated before, but credited to the payee's bank account on or after the day of bankruptcy, the bankruptcy administrator can demand that the bank transfer is reversed. The Supreme Court stated in its decision that the new rule does not apply to bankruptcies declared prior to 20 March 2015.

 

Related news

15.10.2021 NL law
BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

Short Reads - Recently, the Dutch bill for the implementation of BRRD II (i.e. Directive (EU) 2014/59 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/879) in the Netherlands was submitted to Dutch Parliament, where it is currently under debate.

Read more

01.10.2021 NL law
Vanaf 1 oktober strengere regelgeving voor verkoop van turbo’s aan particuliere beleggers

Short Reads - Turbobeleggers nemen veel risico’s en verliezen gemiddeld veel geld. De AFM vindt dat particuliere beleggers onvoldoende beschermd worden tegen de risico’s van turbo’s. De verkoop van turbo’s aan deze beleggers wordt daarom aan banden gelegd. Met ingang van 1 oktober geldt een hefboombeperking, een verplichte risicowaarschuwing en een verbod op handelsbonussen. Daarmee wil de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) particuliere beleggers beter beschermen tegen de risico’s van turbo’s.

Read more

14.10.2021 NL law
NFTs: New legal challenges on the horizon

Short Reads - Non-Fungible Tokens, widely known as NFTs, have recently gained much attention due to their role in the transfer of digital artworks. The market for NFTs grew from USD 13.5m in the first six months of 2020 to USD 2.5bn in the first half of 2021 and is still growing at an expansive rate. Notwithstanding their increasing popularity in the world of art, NFTs have many potential applications. In this blog Maciek Bednarski, Annemijn Witkam and Roderik Vrolijk explain what NFTs are and describe some of the legal challenges they will bring about.

Read more

20.09.2021 NL law
AFM: Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid

Articles - Beleggingsfondsen kunnen beleggers beter informeren over duurzaamheid. De informatieverschaffing van fondsen over duurzaamheidsrisico’s en duurzaamheidskenmerken is nog vaak te algemeen, daardoor krijgen beleggers te weinig inzicht in waar ze in investeren. Dat is een van de conclusies van de Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) in een verkennend onderzoek naar de toepassing van de Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

Read more

11.10.2021 NL law
Vervolgonderzoek van de AFM naar incidentmeldingen door asset managers

Articles - Sinds de uitbraak van het coronavirus wordt ook in de financiële sector meer op afstand samengewerkt. Dat brengt specifieke risico’s met zich mee. De Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM) gaat daarom vervolgonderzoek doen naar het melden van incidenten door asset managers. De reden is het uitblijven van een stijging van het aantal incidentmeldingen ondanks herhaalde oproepen daartoe.

Read more