Articles

Dutch Parliament round-table conversations regarding credit restructuring departments of banks

Dutch Parliament round-table conversations regarding credit restructuring departments of banks

Dutch Parliament round-table conversations regarding credit restructuring departments of banks

30.04.2015 NL law

The Dutch financial sector remains subject to scrutiny by the Dutch government. In March 2015, a public hearing was organised by the Standing Committee on Finance of the Dutch Parliament (the “Committee”) with respect to the practices of credit restructuring departments of banks. 

On this occasion, the Committee invited experts and other people directly involved with this issue to provide an explanation, and to answer questions from Members of Parliament. No official records of these round‑table conversation are available. We attended the hearing and prepared a summary which is available upon request.

The reason for the round-table was the publication of a report by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets ("AFM") on the credit restructuring departments of Dutch banks. The AFM examined the files of small and medium sized companies which were transferred to the credit restructuring departments of banks. The AFM did not identify any unacceptable practices by such departments. However, according to the AFM, there is room for improvement when it comes to transparency and communication with the companies involved. Companies for example do not always know what to expect and what the objective of the restructuring process is. However, the AFM did not see a pattern of unreasonable actions performed by the banks.

According to Mr. Korte (board member of the AFM), banks should identify risks timely and, more importantly, explain these risks to the companies. Mr. Biesheuvel (founder of a lobby organisation for companies) emphasized that trust in the banking sector should be restored. Banks should for example explain under what conditions the special credit management regime can be exited again. Lobby groups agree that more regulation is not the answer. What the government could do, is establishing a centre where companies can ask for a second opinion. It was furthermore discussed whether or not there is an unequal balance of power between banks and their clients. Mr. Fennema (journalist of a web log) believes that there is an unequal balance and argued that banks are able to unilaterally change the terms and conditions applicable to companies in distress. Prof. Adriaanse (Leiden University) discussed the circumstances that can contribute to a positive outcome; an outcome in which the company returns to normal banking conditions. Important is a sense of urgency at the management and shareholder levels of the company. The directors and shareholders of the company should feel the need to change the organisation.

A summary of the hearing is available upon request.

Related news

30.03.2022 LU law
(R)evolution of the securitisation framework

Articles - On 4 March 2022, the law of 25 February 2022 amending the law of 22 March 2004 on securitisation (the 2004 Law) has been published. It entered into force on 8 March 2022. This is a welcomed (r)evolution in the securitisation operations in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg after 18 years of implementation of a tested and widely admitted legal framework.

Read more

25.02.2022
Stibbe Debt Finance Seminar/Webinar: issues you need to know about in 2022

Seminar - On Wednesday March 9 (16:00-17:30) Stibbe presents a seminar to update and outlook you on legal challenges facing financial market participants in 2022. In addition, on Wednesday March 16, 2022, (12:00-13:30), a webinar will also be held on the same theme. The in-person seminar will be held in Dutch and the online session in English.

Read more

11.03.2022 LU law
The New Luxembourg SFDR and Taxonomy Regulation Implementing Law

Articles - On 3 March 2022, the Luxembourg law of 25 February 2022 implementing a.o. the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the Taxonomy Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. This law specifies the CSSF and CAA's supervisory and investigation powers concerning financial market participants and financial advisers under their supervision in relation to the control of the implementation of the SFDR and the Taxonomy Regulation, as well as, their administrative sanctioning powers in case of non-compliance by in-scope firms.

Read more