Articles

Belgian Privacy Commission clarifies data breach notification requirement

Belgian Privacy Commission clarifies data breach notification requirement

Belgian Privacy Commission clarifies data breach notification requirement

17.12.2014

As a consequence of several data breaches, the Belgian Privacy Commission (“BPC”) published in January 2013 a recommendation to prevent data breaches. In this recommendation the BPC has for the first time mentioned the existence of a requirement to notify a data breach within 48 hours to the competent authorities. In a recently published Q&A on its website, the BPC now tries to clarify this requirement.

Although the BPC recognizes that there is no legal requirement to notify a data breach, the BPC advises strongly to do so nevertheless. It therefore reiterates the previously mentioned notification period of 48 hours.

The BPC stipulates further that the persons concerned by a data breach will also need to be informed by means that allow the affected persons to receive the relevant information quickly. The notification to the persons affected by the breach should contain the following information, among other things:

  • Contact details from which the data subjects can obtain additional information on a breach incident;
  • A summary of the incident that has affected the personal data of the data subject;
  • The nature and the purpose of the personal data concerned;
  • Conceivable consequences of the data breach for the data subject;
  • Circumstances under which the data breach took place;
  • Measures taken by the data controller to prevent the data breach;
  • The measures on which the data controller advises the data subjects to take to mitigate the damage.

A notification to the data subjects is not required if the data have been sufficiently encrypted. Also, the notification may be postponed if there is a risk that the notification to the data subjects might jeopardize the effectiveness of the investigation. If this occurs, the data controller must indicate on the notification form that it wishes for such permission and explains the reasons for this.

The BPC also sets out further the circumstances in which no notification to the BPC is required: (i) if the data are encrypted, and (ii) if the following three conditions have been fulfilled:

  1. The data subject has immediately been informed of the complete scope of the breach as well as its consequences;
  2. The data breach concerns only a limited group of people (about 100 persons); and
  3. No sensitive or financial data have been compromised.

Finally, the BPC also makes a form available on its website to facilitate the notification procedure. This form must be completed and sent to the BPC via a secured e-forms application on its website.

The complete Q&A of the BPC can be found on: http//www.privacycommission.be.

 

Click here to see a printable version of this article

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

Team

Related news

16.01.2020 BE law
24 January 2020: Carol Evrard participates in a panel session on Global Compliance at the CPDP conference in Brussels

Speaking slot - Stibbe is a long standing partner of the International Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference (CPDP) which takes place in Brussels between 22 and 24 January 2020 This year's theme is “Data protection and Artificial intelligence”. Carol Evrard, associate in our TMT team, participates in a panel organised by TrustArc (a privacy compliance technology company based in San Francisco, California) on "Changing Technology and Laws: Can Accountability be a Key to Global Compliance?"

Read more

15.01.2020 NL law
Consultatiereactie 'Wet plan van aanpak witwassen'

Short Reads - Soeradj Ramsanjhal, Karlijn van den Heuvel, Djoe Kuils, Rogier Raas, Judica Krikke en Muriël Rosing hebben een reactie ingediend op het concept wetsvoorstel ‘Wet plan van aanpak witwassen’. Dit wetsvoorstel is 2 december 2019 in consultatie gegaan en bevat verschillende voorgestelde wijzigingen van de Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme en de Wet op de economische delicten. 

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring