Articles

Antwerp Commercial Court finds that Bhaalu cannot lawfully rely upon the “private copy” exception enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act

Antwerp Commercial Court finds that Bhaalu cannot lawfully rely upon the “private copy” exception enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act

Antwerp Commercial Court finds that Bhaalu cannot lawfully rely upon the “private copy” exception enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act

17.12.2014

Right Brain Interface NV is a young technology company that has created a remote DVR (digital video recording) storage service called “Bhaalu”. In essence this service allows its subscribers to record the television programs they can watch according to their TV channels’ subscription and to store these programs on servers owned by the unincorporated association of Bhaalu users (“in the cloud”). This way, Bhaalu users can watch TV programs on demand up to 3 months after they have been aired.

This article was co-written by Valerie Vanryckeghem

This article was co-written by Valerie VanryckeghemThis system is also called “Collaborative Video Recorder” (or CVR) given that the users are basically sharing the cost of certain common components of the CVR hardware, without it being technically possible for them to share or transfer content with other users.

Naturally, Bhaalu’s entry on the Belgian market has led to a great deal of opposition by Belgian broadcasters. This has led Medialaan, VRT, and SBS Belgium to sue Right Brain Interface NV before the Commercial Court of Antwerp on grounds of their right to exclusive reproduction and communication enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act.

The broadcasters asserted that Right Brain Interface NV should have obtained the broadcasters’ prior consent because they had an exclusive reproduction right. But Right Brain Interface NV invoked the “private copy”-exception provided by the Belgian Copyright Act on grounds that the user may only (i) use Bhaalu if he or she has subscribed to the particular channel, (ii) watch his or her own recorded programs, and (iii) watch his or her recorded programs within the “family circle”.

The Antwerp Court first concluded that it was indeed the Bhaalu user—and not Bhaalu itself—who makes a “private copy” in the sense of the “private copy”-exception under the Belgian Copyright Act.

Then the Court ascertained that the television signals originating from TV Vlaanderen and Telenet constituted the source of Bhaalu’s
recording capacity. These television signals needed to be decrypted and thus also copied in the Bhaalu datacenter in order for Bhaalu to be able to provide its CVR service to its users. However, Right Brain Interface NV did not obtain the prior consent from TV Vlaanderen and Telenet to decrypt these television signals.
Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the broadcasters and declared that Right Brain Interface NV has infringed the broadcasters’ copyrights because it copies television signals from an illicit source and communicates the copied signals to the public, even if the users/subscribers would have lawfully received the broadcast through a television receiver. Finally, Right Brain Interface NV asserted that it merely provides the equipment for making the “private copy”, so it should not be categorized as a service provider. But the Court rejected Right Brain Interface NV’s argument. The Court found that Right Brain Interface NV’s activities in the Bhaalu system were inextricably linked to the infringing acts and that the Bhaalu devices could not function without the interventions of Right Brain Interface NV. Therefore, the Court ordered Right Brain Interface NV, as the intermediary whose services were used for such infringements, to cease its activities under penalty of a fine of EUR 1,000 per week and per user.


Click here to see a printable version of this article

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

Team

Related news

08.11.2019 BE law
Interview with Wouter Ghijsels on Next Gen lawyers

Articles - Stibbe’s managing partner Wouter Ghijsels shares his insights on the next generation of lawyers and the future of the legal profession at the occasion of the Leaders Meeting Paris where Belgian business leaders, politicians and inspiring people from the cultural and academic world will discuss this year's central theme "The Next Gen".

Read more

13.11.2019 NL law
Een strategisch actieplan voor het gebruik van AI door de overheid

Short Reads - Een paar jaren geleden hoorde je er nog nauwelijks over, maar nu kan je er bijna niet meer om heen: kunstmatige intelligentie, ook wel artificiële intelligentie (AI) genoemd.  AI verwijst naar systemen die intelligent gedrag vertonen door hun omgeving te analyseren en – met een zekere mate van zelfstandigheid – actie ondernemen om specifieke doelen te bereiken. Denk aan zelfrijdende auto's of slimme thermostaten. 

Read more

08.11.2019 EU law
Erik Valgaeren is session chair during IBA's 6th Biennial Technology Law Conference in Berlin

Speaking slot - Stibbe's TMT partner, Erik Valgaeren, chairs a session discussing the new legal challenges, created by the most recent technological developments in the field of software, data, online services and telecom, including 5G, pricing algorithms, platforms and data monetization. This session will take place on the 8th of November 2019 in Berlin.

Read more

24.10.2019 BE law
Virtual Currency Regulation Law Review - Belgian chapter

Articles - The second edition of the Virtual Currency Regulation Law Review is intended to provide a practical, business-focused analysis of recent legal and regulatory changes and developments, and of their effects, and to look forward at expected trends in the area of virtual currencies on a country-by-country basis.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring