Articles

Antwerp Commercial Court finds that Bhaalu cannot lawfully rely upon the “private copy” exception enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act

Antwerp Commercial Court finds that Bhaalu cannot lawfully rely upon the “private copy” exception enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act

Antwerp Commercial Court finds that Bhaalu cannot lawfully rely upon the “private copy” exception enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act

17.12.2014

Right Brain Interface NV is a young technology company that has created a remote DVR (digital video recording) storage service called “Bhaalu”. In essence this service allows its subscribers to record the television programs they can watch according to their TV channels’ subscription and to store these programs on servers owned by the unincorporated association of Bhaalu users (“in the cloud”). This way, Bhaalu users can watch TV programs on demand up to 3 months after they have been aired.

This article was co-written by Valerie Vanryckeghem

This article was co-written by Valerie VanryckeghemThis system is also called “Collaborative Video Recorder” (or CVR) given that the users are basically sharing the cost of certain common components of the CVR hardware, without it being technically possible for them to share or transfer content with other users.

Naturally, Bhaalu’s entry on the Belgian market has led to a great deal of opposition by Belgian broadcasters. This has led Medialaan, VRT, and SBS Belgium to sue Right Brain Interface NV before the Commercial Court of Antwerp on grounds of their right to exclusive reproduction and communication enshrined in the Belgian Copyright Act.

The broadcasters asserted that Right Brain Interface NV should have obtained the broadcasters’ prior consent because they had an exclusive reproduction right. But Right Brain Interface NV invoked the “private copy”-exception provided by the Belgian Copyright Act on grounds that the user may only (i) use Bhaalu if he or she has subscribed to the particular channel, (ii) watch his or her own recorded programs, and (iii) watch his or her recorded programs within the “family circle”.

The Antwerp Court first concluded that it was indeed the Bhaalu user—and not Bhaalu itself—who makes a “private copy” in the sense of the “private copy”-exception under the Belgian Copyright Act.

Then the Court ascertained that the television signals originating from TV Vlaanderen and Telenet constituted the source of Bhaalu’s
recording capacity. These television signals needed to be decrypted and thus also copied in the Bhaalu datacenter in order for Bhaalu to be able to provide its CVR service to its users. However, Right Brain Interface NV did not obtain the prior consent from TV Vlaanderen and Telenet to decrypt these television signals.
Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the broadcasters and declared that Right Brain Interface NV has infringed the broadcasters’ copyrights because it copies television signals from an illicit source and communicates the copied signals to the public, even if the users/subscribers would have lawfully received the broadcast through a television receiver. Finally, Right Brain Interface NV asserted that it merely provides the equipment for making the “private copy”, so it should not be categorized as a service provider. But the Court rejected Right Brain Interface NV’s argument. The Court found that Right Brain Interface NV’s activities in the Bhaalu system were inextricably linked to the infringing acts and that the Bhaalu devices could not function without the interventions of Right Brain Interface NV. Therefore, the Court ordered Right Brain Interface NV, as the intermediary whose services were used for such infringements, to cease its activities under penalty of a fine of EUR 1,000 per week and per user.


Click here to see a printable version of this article

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

Team

Related news

21.02.2020 NL law
Podcast: Data en financiële instellingen

Short Reads - In deze podcast praten Roderik Vrolijk en Frederiek Fernhout van Stibbe in Amsterdam en Joran Iedema van Stibbe StartsUP-deelnemer Dyme over Fintech, PSD2 en het gebruik van data door financiële instellingen. Aan de ene kant biedt nieuwe regelgeving zoals PSD2 nieuwe mogelijkheden, aan de andere kant neemt de regeldruk en het toezicht op bescherming van persoonsgegevens toe.

Read more

15.01.2020 NL law
Consultatiereactie 'Wet plan van aanpak witwassen'

Short Reads - Soeradj Ramsanjhal, Karlijn van den Heuvel, Djoe Kuils, Rogier Raas, Judica Krikke en Muriël Rosing hebben een reactie ingediend op het concept wetsvoorstel ‘Wet plan van aanpak witwassen’. Dit wetsvoorstel is 2 december 2019 in consultatie gegaan en bevat verschillende voorgestelde wijzigingen van de Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme en de Wet op de economische delicten. 

Read more

16.01.2020 BE law
24 January 2020: Carol Evrard participates in a panel session on Global Compliance at the CPDP conference in Brussels

Speaking slot - Stibbe is a long standing partner of the International Computers, Privacy and Data Protection Conference (CPDP) which takes place in Brussels between 22 and 24 January 2020 This year's theme is “Data protection and Artificial intelligence”. Carol Evrard, associate in our TMT team, participates in a panel organised by TrustArc (a privacy compliance technology company based in San Francisco, California) on "Changing Technology and Laws: Can Accountability be a Key to Global Compliance?"

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring