Articles

Flexibilization of Dutch B.V. law as per 1 October 2012

Flexibilization of Dutch B.V. law as per 1 October 2012

Flexibilization of Dutch B.V. law as per 1 October 2012

01.10.2012

1.  Introduction 
 
Today the Act for simplification and flexibilisation of private company law (Wet vereenvoudiging en flexibilisering bv-recht or "Flex BV Act") entered into force, making important changes to Dutch law applicable to private companies with limited liability (besloten vennootschappen or "B.V.'s").

The Flex BV Act will introduce increased flexibility and greater freedom in structuring businesses for both outbound investments by GCC investors (i.e. investors from Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE) and outbound investments into the GCC. In combination with the attractive Dutch corporate tax system, the broad double taxation and bilateral investment treaty network, this increased flexibility provides a unique environment for establishing companies and joint ventures in the Netherlands.

This newsletter provides an overview of the key changes in Dutch company law resulting from the introduction of the Flex BV Act. 
 
2.  The B.V. as Dutch holding entity 
 
The B.V. is a Dutch legal entity typically used for holding purposes. In this context, it should be noted that the legislation on the supervision of legal entities (Wet Controle op Rechtspersonen) introduced on 1 July 2011, has already resulted in an increase in the flexibility of Dutch company law by abolishing the requirement of having to obtain a statement of no-objection prior to incorporating a B.V. The introduction of the Flex BV Act will result in a further simplification and flexibilisation of the B.V.'s legal regime, thereby creating an even more favourable corporate climate for GCC investors. 
 
3.  Key changes under the new Flex BV Act 
 
3.1 Capital and capital protection

Under the Flex BV Act minimal capital requirements will no longer apply. Also a specified authorised capital will no longer be required in the articles of association. In the context of capital protection, it will no longer be necessary to submit an auditor's statement in case of a non-cash payment on shares. Additionally, the bank statement required to be submitted when shares are paid up in cash upon a B.V.'s incorporation will no longer apply. Also, the capital can be denominated in a foreign currency. Shares do not need to be paid up in full and the parties are free to make arrangements as to when this will happen. The 'nachgründung', which imposes additional requirements on transactions entered into between the B.V. and a founder or a shareholder within two years of the B.V.'s initial registration in the trade register, will also no longer apply. Finally, the rule on financial assistance, meaning that a B.V. may not provide security for the acquisition of its own shares, will cease to exist. It is the responsibility of the managing board to assess whether such transactions are possible.

3.2. Decision making

Under the Flex BV Act, a B.V. may issue non-voting shares with dividend rights as well as voting shares without dividend rights. It thus provides for a flexible manner to separate profit-sharing and voting rights. In addition, the articles of association can provide that holders of certain types of shares can exercise multiple votes.

The period for convening a shareholders' meeting is reduced to eight days. However, if the notice to convene a shareholders' meeting is not provided in time, resolutions can be adopted nonetheless, if those entitled to attend the shareholders' meeting all agree to convene a meeting. Additionally, shareholders' meetings can now be held outside of the Netherlands if provided for by the articles of association or those entitled to attend shareholders' meetings have provided their consent. Furthermore, it will also be possible to adopt resolutions without holding a meeting in person, provided that those entitled to attend the shareholders' meeting have provided their consent to this manner of adopting resolutions. This does not mean, however, that every shareholder has to vote in favour of the proposal.

3.3. Transfer of shares

It is no longer required to include provisions in the articles of association that restrict the transferability of shares, such as making a transfer subject to the shareholders' or the managing board's approval, or providing for a right of first refusal. However, if the articles of association do not include any provision on the transferability, the statutory provision applies which provides the other shareholders with a right of first refusal. Other restrictions are also possible if they do not lead to transfers becoming extremely difficult or impossible. In this context it should be noted, though, that a lock-up, during which the transfer of shares is prohibited for a certain period of time, is possible. If a shareholder wishes to transfer shares but cannot do so because of the applicable transfer restrictions, then such shareholder must always be able to dispose of its shares for a price that can under the new rules be agreed between the parties (and is therefore no longer required to be equal to fair market value). In this context, the articles of association must include a pricing mechanism.

3.4. Appointment of directors and the right to give instructions

The general meeting will have the right to appoint, suspend and dismiss managing and supervisory directors. The meeting of holders of shares of a certain type may also have this right, if provided for in the articles of association. However, each shareholder with voting rights should have the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process of the appointment of at least one board member or supervisory board member. Additionally, the articles of association can limit the circle of eligible persons. The binding nature of a nomination for appointment is still possible, but no more than one person is required.

Another important change is that the managing board can be given specific instructions by the general meeting of shareholders or another corporate body. The managing board must comply with these instructions, unless following such instructions would be detrimental to the company.

3.5. Arrangements between shareholders in the articles of association

Arrangements between shareholders can now be included in the articles of association, such as tag-along rights or special requirements in relation to the identity of the shareholder. The inclusion of these provisions in the articles of association are favourable because a breach will have third party effect and the B.V. can, if the shareholder fails to comply, suspend the payment of dividends and the exercise of voting rights by a defaulting shareholder. We do note that the articles of association are publicly available meaning that any third party can obtain a copy of the articles of association from the trade register.

3.6. Distributions, repurchase of shares and capital reduction

The level up to which distributions may be made from the shareholders' equity has been revised in the Flex BV Act. The paid-up capital and the called-up capital no longer form part of the mandatory shareholders' equity and may be distributed. The remaining limitation for a distribution is the requirement that a distribution can only take place if the company's equity exceeds the reserves which the company must maintain by law or pursuant to the articles of association (the assets test). Distributions require the approval of the managing board. Before granting its approval, the managing board must also apply a liquidity test. If the managing board is aware or should reasonably have been aware that the distribution will ultimately lead to the company's incapacity to pay its due and payable debts, their approval should be denied. If, however, approval is granted in such situations, the managing board members will be held jointly and severally liable for the deficit that resulted from the distribution. The same applies to a receiving shareholder, but only to the extent of the amount it received.

A B.V. will be entitled to repurchase its own shares, as long as one share with voting right and dividend entitlement remains outstanding. It can reduce its share capital without having to go through the lengthy procedure that currently applies. The assets and liquidity tests described above with respect to distributions will also apply to the repurchase of shares and capital reduction. 
 
4.  Conclusion 
 
It is clear that the introduction of the Flex BV Act as of today will bring more flexibility to Dutch company law for GCC related investments (both inbound and outbound).

The Flex BV Act will enter into force with immediate effect. This means that as of today the new legislation will immediately apply to all B.V.'s. Therefore it is important that the articles of association of existing companies are reviewed, in order to establish whether the B.V. can benefit from the implementation of the Flex BV Act. The Flex BV Act will ease a large number of corporate provisions and introduces more possibilities to deviate from the provisions of the law in the articles of association, which offers for GCC related investments a great deal of freedom to incorporate or structure their B.V. as they see fit.

We would be pleased to advise you on the contents of the articles of association of your existing B.V. and the possibilities of the new legislation for your existing B.V. or the incorporation of a new B.V.

Team

Related news

05.09.2019 NL law
ECJ answers preliminary questions on jurisdiction in cartel damage case 

Short Reads - On 29 July 2019, the ECJ handed down a preliminary ruling concerning jurisdiction in follow-on damages proceedings in what is termed the trucks cartel. The court clarified that Article 7(2) Brussels I Regulation should be interpreted in such a way as to allow an indirect purchaser to sue an alleged infringer of Article 101 TFEU before the courts of the place where the market prices were distorted and where the indirect purchaser claims to have suffered damage. In practice, this often means that indirect purchasers will be able to sue for damages in their home jurisdictions.

Read more

05.09.2019 NL law
Wanted: fast solutions for fast-growing platforms

Short Reads - Dominant digital companies be warned: calls for additional tools to deal with powerful platforms in online markets are increasing. Even though the need for speed is a given in these fast-moving markets, the question of which tool is best-suited for the job remains. Different countries are focusing on different areas; the Dutch ACM wants to pre-emptively strike down potential anti-competitive conduct with ex ante measures, while the UK CMA aims for greater regulation of digital markets and a quick fix through interim orders.

Read more

18.09.2019 NL law
AFM en accountants: over wortel en stok (met roeptoeter)

Articles - Sinds de inwerkingtreding van de Wet toezicht accountantsorgansaties (Wta) houdt de AFM toezicht op accountsorganisaties en de bij die organisaties werkzame individuele accountants. Voor dit toezicht heeft de wetgever de AFM ruimschoots voorzien van stokken (en van een enkele wortel). 

Read more

05.09.2019 NL law
No fine means no reason to appeal? Think again!

Short Reads - Whistleblowers who have had their fine reduced to zero may still have an interest in challenging an antitrust decision. The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) held two de facto managers personally liable for a cartel infringement but, instead of imposing a EUR 170,000 fine, granted one of them immunity from fines in return for blowing the whistle. The Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal found that, despite this fortuitous outcome, the whistleblower still had an interest in appealing the ACM's decision.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring