Articles

Legal and Tax Alert - Middle East

Legal and Tax Alert - Middle East

Legal and Tax Alert - Middle East

05.03.2012

New Netherlands – Saudi tax treaty provides opportunities for structuring investments into Saudi

The tax treaty between the Netherlands and Saudi Arabia (the "Treaty") has become effective as of 1 January 2011 (click here for more details on the Treaty, Stibbe Tax Alert of 22 October 2008). Since the Treaty contains a unique provision which should generally protect Dutch investors against a 20% Saudi Arabian ("Saudi") capital gains tax levy upon a sale or a transfer of the shares of a SA subsidiary, it can be most beneficial for non-Saudi investors to structure their investments into Saudi Arabia (inbound investments) through a Dutch intermediate company. The attractive and robust tax system and reliable and flexible corporate laws of the Netherlands allow for the efficient structuring of Dutch (holding) companies.

In Saudi Arabia a capital gains tax at the rate of 20% is levied upon the transfer of shares in a Saudi entity by a non-Saudi shareholder. According to the Treaty - which contains a unique provision which is not included in the tax treaties entered into by SA with some 20 other countries - a Dutch entity should be protected against such capital gains tax levy, provided that it beneficially holds at least 10% of the shares of the Saudi entity and the shares are acquired after a date that the Treaty was signed (i.e. after 13 October 2008). Furthermore, under the Treaty in certain reorganisation structures such capital gains tax may be postponed until the date on which the final alienation of investment is made, even in case the interest would be below 10%.

Also the domestic Saudi rate on royalty payments of 15% can generally be reduced to 7% under the Treaty. Income from debt claims and dividend distributions by a Saudi entity to non-Saudi shareholders are subject to a 5% domestic withholding tax in Saudi Arabia, which rate is in principle not further reduced under tax treaties (including the Treaty) entered into by Saudi Arabia.

It can be concluded that the Netherlands with its unique Treaty with Saudi Arabia and its robust and long established position for (joint venture) holding and financing entities, is excellently positioned to be a leading jurisdiction for investments into Saudi Arabia.

Team

Related news

06.02.2020 NL law
Pay-for-delay: brightened lines between object and effect restrictions

Short Reads - In its first pay-for-delay case, the ECJ has clarified the criteria determining whether settlement agreements between a patent holder of a pharmaceutical product and a generic manufacturer may have as their object or effect to restrict EU competition law. The judgment confirms the General Court’s earlier rulings in Lundbeck and Servier (see our October 2016 and December 2018 newsletters) in which it was held that pay-for-delay agreements (in these cases) constituted a restriction ‘by object’.

Read more

06.02.2020 NL law
Consumers and Sustainability: 2020 competition enforcement buzzwords

Short Reads - The ACM will include the effects of mergers on labour conditions in its review. It will also investigate excessive pricing of prescription drugs. As well as these topics, the ACM has designated the digital economy and energy transition as its 2020 focus areas. Companies can therefore expect increased enforcement to protect online consumers, and active probing of algorithms.

Read more

06.02.2020 NL law
The ACM may cast the net wide in cartel investigations

Short Reads - Companies beware: the ACM may not need to specify the scope of its investigation into suspected cartel infringements in as much detail as expected. On 14 January 2020, the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal upheld the ACM’s appeal against judgments of the Rotterdam District Court, which had quashed cartel fines imposed on cold storage operators. The operators had argued that the ACM was time-barred from pursuing a case against them, because the ACM had not suspended the prescription period by beginning investigative actions specifically related to the alleged infringements.

Read more

06.02.2020 NL law
Den Bosch Court of Appeal revives damages claims in Dutch prestressing steel litigation

Short Reads - On 28 January 2020, the Court of Appeal of Den Bosch issued a ruling in the Dutch prestressing steel litigation. In its ruling, the Court of Appeal overturned a 2016 judgment of the District Court of Limburg, in which it was held that civil damages claims brought by Deutsche Bahn were time-barred under German law (see our January 2017 newsletter).

Read more

06.02.2020 NL law
CDC/Kemira: Amsterdam Court of Appeal applies European principle of effectiveness to limitation periods

Short Reads - In a private enforcement case brought by CDC against Kemira, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal applies the European principle of effectiveness and rules that claims are not time-barred under Spanish, Finnish and Swedish law. With reference to the Cogeco judgment of the ECJ, the Court considers that claimants must be able to await the outcome of any administrative appeal against an infringement decision, even in relation to respondents who themselves have not filed appeals against the infringement decision.

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring