Articles

The Amending Prospectus Directive: its contents and the FSMA’s policy as of 1 July 2012

The Amending Prospectus Directive: its contents and the FSMA’s policy as of 1 July 2012

The Amending Prospectus Directive: its contents and the FSMA’s policy as of 1 July 2012

29.06.2012 BE law

By 1 July 2012, Belgium should have implemented Directive 2010/73/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 (the “Amending Prospectus Directive”), which introduces several amendments to the Prospectus Directive (Directive 2003/71/EC on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading)1 (unofficial consolidated version), and aims at simplifying and reducing certain obligations under the Prospectus Directive that were considered to be unnecessarily burdensome, without compromising the investors’ protection and the proper functioning of the capital markets in the European Union.

The most significant changes introduced by the Amending Prospectus Directive include the following:

Scope of the prospectus obligation: The Prospectus Directive only applies to an offer of securities provided that the aggregate consideration for such offer exceeds certain thresholds. The Amending Prospectus Directive raises such thresholds from EUR 2,500,000 to EUR 5,000,000 (for offers of equity securities) and from EUR 50,000,000 to EUR 75,000,000 for (offers of non-equity securities issued in a continuous or repeated manner by credit institutions).

Exemptions from the prospectus obligation: The Amending Prospectus Directive amends the scope of the following exemptions from the prospectus obligation:

  • minimum consideration – the Prospectus Directive provides for an exemption from the prospectus obligation for offers of securities addressed to investors who acquire securities for a total consideration of at least EUR 50,000 per investor as well as for a offers of securities whose denomination per unit amounts to at least EUR 50,000. The Amending Prospectus Directive increases both thresholds to EUR 100,000;
  • private placements – the number of persons (other than qualified investors) per Member State to whom an offer can be made without having to publish a prospectus, is raised from 100 to 150;
  • merger – the exemption for securities offered within the framework of a merger is extended to the securities offered within the framework of a demerger;
  • employees – the employee offers exemption is extended to all companies which have their head office or registered office in the European Union. In addition, such exemption is extended to companies established outside the European Union whose securities are admitted to trading either on a regulated market or on a third-country market, provided that adequate information is available.

Validity of the prospectus: Even though the European Commission had proposed to extend the validity period of a prospectus up to 24 months, the Amending Prospectus Directive retains the current validity period of 12 months. However, such validity period is now calculated from the date of approval of the prospectus (and thus no longer as from its publication date). 

Annual update obligation: The Amending Prospectus Directive repeals the current obligation to file a document on an annual basis containing or referring to all information published or made available to the public during the preceding 12 months.

Qualified Investors: The Amending Prospectus Directive amends the definition of “qualified investors” so as to align it to the notion “professional clients or eligible counterparties” under the MIFID Directive.

Retail cascades: The Amending Prospectus Directive provides that no new prospectus is required for any subsequent resale or final placement of securities through financial intermediaries as long as a valid prospectus is available and the issuer or person responsible for the prospectus consents to its use by means of a written agreement, whereas under the current Prospectus Regime any such subsequent resale or final placement constitutes a separate offer, requiring a separate exemption from the original offer or the publication of a prospectus.
 
Prospectus summary: The Amending Prospectus Directive sets out (in more detail) certain requirements with respect to the content and format of the summary.

It requires the summary to include certain “key information”, which consists of the essential characteristics of, and risks associated with, the issuer, any guarantor, and the securities offered, the general terms of the offer, including estimated expenses, and the risk associated with an investment, in a concise manner and in non-technical language.

In addition, the summary will need to be drawn up in a certain format, the details of which will be determined by the European Commission.

The current civil liability regime for the summary is extended to the situation where the summary, when read together with the other parts of the prospectus, does not provide key information in order to aid investors when considering whether to invest in such securities.

Supplements to the prospectus and the right of withdrawal: Article 16 of the Prospectus Directive provides for a right of withdrawal forinvestors, in the event a supplement to the prospectus is published after such investors had already agreed to purchase or subscribe for the securities.

The Amending Prospectus Directive provides that:

  • the right of withdrawal can only be applied in the event that (i) the initial prospectus relates to a public offering of shares (and thus not in the event such prospectus relates to an admission to trading) and (ii) the new factor, mistake or inaccuracy to which the supplement relates, has arisen before the final closing of the offer to the public and the delivery of the securities;
  • the right of withdrawal must be exercised within two working days after the publication of the supplement. Consequently, the Member States will no longer be allowed to provide for a longer term;
  • the period within which the right of withdrawal is to be exercised, can be extended by the issuer or the offeror; and
  • the final date of the right of withdrawal must be mentioned in the supplement.

As mentioned above, all Member States should have implemented the changes to the current prospectus regime by 1 July 2012.

To date, a legislative proposal has not yet been submitted to the Belgian Parliament.

Nevertheless, the Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA)has announced that, in its opinion, the provisions of the Amending Prospectus Directive are sufficiently clear, precise and unconditional to have “vertical direct effect”.

Accordingly, the FSMA has decided to apply the provisions of the Amending Prospectus Directive as of 1 July 2012 except to the extent that the Amending Prospectus Directive would impose additional obligations to the issuers (it being understood that the issuers will still be allowed to apply such more stringent provisions of the Amending Prospectus Directive voluntarily, which will enable them to benefit from the Community-wide approval of the prospectus).

For completeness’ sake, it is to be noted that the Commission Delegated Regulation No 486/2012 dated 30 March 2012 (amending Regulation (EC) No 809/2004) will enter into force on 1 July 2012 as well. Such Commission Delegated Regulation introduces certain amendments as regards the format and the content of the prospectus, the base prospectus, the summary and the final terms and as regards the disclosure requirements.

Footnote

 
  1. The Amending Prospectus Directive also introduces certain amendments to the Directive 2004/109/EC on the harmonization of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market. Such amendments are not addressed by this newsletter.

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

Team

Related news

12.07.2018 NL law
Wet aanvullende maatregelen accountantsorganisaties in werking getreden

Short Reads - Op 1 juli 2018 zijn de Wet aanvullende maatregelen accountantsorganisaties en het bijbehorende Besluit tot onder meer aanpassing van het Besluit toezicht accountantsorganisaties (Bta) (grotendeels) in werking getreden. De wet beoogt de kwaliteit van de accountantscontroles te verbeteren. Met het oog daarop zijn met name voorschriften ingevoerd die zien op de governance van accountantsorganisaties en zijn de bevoegdheden van de AFM uitgebreid.

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Initiatief wetsvoorstel Wet bestuurlijk verbod rechtspersonen geconsulteerd

Articles - Begin dit jaar is het initiatief van enkele Kamerleden voor het voorstel van de Wet bestuurlijk verbod rechtspersonen geconsulteerd. Het voorstel geeft de Minister voor Rechtsbescherming de bevoegdheid om een rechtspersoon bij beschikking te verbieden en te ontbinden indien zijn werkzaamheid in strijd is met de openbare orde. De wet is een aanvulling op de mogelijkheid voor de rechter om – op verzoek van het Openbaar Ministerie – rechtspersonen waarvan de werkzaamheid in strijd is met de openbare orde verboden te verklaren en te ontbinden (art. 2:20 BW).

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming van toepassing

Short Reads - Vanaf 25 mei 2018 zijn de Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (Verordening (EU) 2016/679) (AVG) en de Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (Uitvoeringswet) van toepassing in Nederland. De AVG en de Uitvoeringswet vervangen de richtlijn betreffende de bescherming van natuurlijke personen in verband met de verwerking van persoonsgegevens (Richtlijn 95/46/EG) en de Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens (Wbp).

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Evaluatie van de Wet aanpassing enquêterecht

Articles - Op 1 januari 2013 is de Wet aanpassing enquêterecht in werking getreden. Deze wet is geëvalueerd door de Tilburg University. De uitkomsten van deze evaluatie zijn op 21 maart 2018 door de Minister voor Rechtsbescherming gepubliceerd. In deze Corporate Update een overzicht van enkele conclusies en aanbevelingen van de onderzoekscommissie. Wij verwijzen in dit verband tevens naar de samenvatting van het onderzoek.

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Voortgang wetsvoorstel Wet bescherming bedrijfsgeheimen

Short Reads - Op 5 juli 2016 is de Richtlijn bedrijfsgeheimen (2016/943/EU) in werking getreden. De richtlijn heeft tot doel de regels inzake bescherming van niet-openbaar gemaakte knowhow en bedrijfsinformatie (bedrijfsgeheimen) in de EU lidstaten te harmoniseren. De richtlijn moest voor 9 juni 2018 geïmplementeerd zijn in de Nederlandse wet- en regelgeving. Nederland heeft deze termijn niet gehaald.

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Boskalis/Fugro: begrenzing van het agenderingsrecht van aandeelhouders

Articles - Aandeelhouders en certificaathouders hebben op grond van art. 2:114a BW agenderingsrecht. Maar kunnen zij ook op de algemene vergadering een (informele) stemming afdwingen over een onderwerp dat niet tot de bevoegdheid van de algemene vergadering behoort? Deze vraag stond centraal in een arrest van de Hoge Raad van 20 april 2018 tussen Boskalis en Fugro.  

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring