Articles

Corporate Alert

Corporate Alert

Corporate Alert

02.01.2012 NL law

Update Notification Requirements:
Policy rule published and consequences for current positions

1.  AFM published Policy Rule on cash settled instruments 
 
We refer to our corporate alert of last Friday in relation to the entry into force of the amended section 5:45 (10) of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (the "Wft") on 1 January 2012. The amendment introduced a new notification requirement for large positions in cash settled instruments. The AFM has now published a policy rule in relation to the new notification requirement.

The policy rule indicates how interests in cash settled instruments must be calculated. Cash settled instruments will have to be reported on a delta adjusted basis as of 1 October 2012. The 'delta' of a derivative position shows how the payout of that derivative changes in relation to a change in the price of the underlying share. However, until 30 September 2012 such positions may also be reported on the basis of the nominal value of the shares represented by a cash settled instrument. When notifying interests in cash settled instruments on the basis of nominal values, an explanatory note must be filed setting out the main terms of the instrument. This allows third parties to determine the impact on a delta adjusted basis.

The policy rule also contains a special regime with respect to cash settled interests in indices or baskets of shares. 
 
2.  Consequences for current positions 
 
The new notification requirement for cash settled instruments may also impact the calculation of overall positions held with regard to shares in listed companies and may require a new notification. A new notification obligation can arise as a result of the recalculation of the current positions that must now also include cash settled instruments.

Prior to the amendment, both direct and indirect holdings and voting interests required notification if certain thresholds were reached or crossed. As a result of the amendment now also cash settled instruments must be taken into consideration and added to the overall calculation. By way of a simplified example, this means that if you held a 4% (in)direct stake in listed company X with an additional 2 % through cash settled instruments prior to 1 January 2012, a notification obligation arises as of 1 January 2012 as a result of the entry into force of the new notification requirement. This is caused by the fact that in this example, the total holding (6%) exceeds a 5% reporting threshold.

Note that a transitional regime applies that effectively extends the filing period one time to four weeks from 31 December 2011. This transitional regime does not apply to changes in holdings as a result of transactions occurred after 31 December 2011. 
 
3.  Yearly update 
 
Although unrelated to the introduction of a notification requirement in respect of cash settled instruments, we take this opportunity to also draw your attention to the yearly update obligation pursuant to Section 5:41 Wft. A periodic notification obligation may arise as a result of a change in the composition of the large position that differs from the previous notification made. If this composition differs at 31 December at 12 midnight vis-à-vis the previous notification an update must be filed within four weeks from 31 December.

Team

Related news

07.07.2020 NL law
Inwerkingtreding Tijdelijke Wet COVID-19 Justitie & Veiligheid

Short Reads - Op 24 april 2020 is de Tijdelijke Wet COVID-19 Justitie & Veiligheid (“de Noodwet”) in werking getreden. Aan de hand van de Noodwet kunnen rechtspersonen tijdelijk afwijken van wettelijke en statutaire bepalingen en kunnen bepaalde termijnen worden uitgesteld. De Noodwet is een antwoord op de beperkingen die gelden als gevolg van de uitbraak van COVID-19. De Tijdelijke wet COVID-19 Justitie en Veiligheid is een verzamelwet.

Read more

18.06.2020 NL law
Biodiversiteitsverlies leidt tot financiële risico’s

Short Reads - De afname van biodiversiteit staat net als klimaatverandering hoog op de agenda in de financiële sector, omdat dit kan leiden tot financiële risico’s. Nederlandse banken, verzekeraars en pensioenfondsen hebben voor honderden miljarden euro’s aan financieringen uitstaan waarop ze mogelijk risico’s lopen als gevolg van biodiversiteitsverlies.

Read more

07.07.2020 NL law
Inwerkingtreding deel Implementatiewet Herziene aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn

Short Reads - In onze Corporate Update van 6 februari 2020 bespraken wij de inwerkingtreding van de Wet tot implementatie van de Herziene aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn (“SRD II”) (“Implementatiewet”) op 1 december 2019. De bepalingen over de identificatie van aandeelhouders, de uitwisseling van informatie met aandeelhouders en de facilitering van (stem)rechten treden op 3 september 2020 in werking.

Read more

26.05.2020 NL law
De Tijdelijke wet COVID-19 Justitie en Veiligheid - Meer mogelijkheden voor rechtspersonen tot het gebruik van elektronische communicatiemiddelen en het uitstellen van termijnen

Articles - Het Nederland van twee maanden geleden is niet het Nederland van nu. Vanwege de uitbraak van het coronavirus en de bestrijding daarvan heeft het Nederlandse kabinet diverse overheidsmaatregelen opgelegd om de volksgezondheid en de economie te beschermen. Zo wordt een beroep gedaan op Nederlanders om gepaste afstand van elkaar (circa anderhalve meter) te houden en zijn bijeenkomsten met meer dan 100 personen in heel Nederland niet langer mogelijk. 

Read more

20.05.2020 NL law
Perpetual securities not considered equity for Dutch corporate income tax purposes

Short Reads - In a decision of Friday 15 May 2020, the Dutch Supreme Court confirmed that fixed-to-floating rate perpetual equity securities (“perpetual securities”) should not be considered a “participation loan” (deelnemerschapslening) for Dutch tax purposes. Under Dutch tax law, characterization of a debt instrument as a “participation loan” implies that such instrument is deemed equity for Dutch corporate income tax purposes. Characterization of the perpetual securities as a participation loan would have meant that the interest would have been regarded non-deductible dividend.

Read more