Short Reads

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

01.03.2018 NL law

On 1 February 2018, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) published a position paper setting out its strategy in relation to market dominance of internet and technology companies. The position paper confirms that the ACM will focus on digital markets and closely monitor developments in this area.

The ACM highlights the following three pillars of its strategy with regard to digital markets:

  1. Invest in knowledge on the functioning of digital markets. The ACM intends to invest in obtaining knowledge on the functioning of digital markets.

  2. Active monitoring of the market. The ACM will continue to closely monitor developments in the market so that it can act in a timely and accurate manner. At the same time, the ACM recognizes that technological innovation in digital markets is important for competitive dynamics, which it does not want to disrupt.

  3. Focus on international and national cooperation. Finally, the ACM will actively cooperate with international and national authorities in this sector. For example, the position paper referred to cooperation with the European Commission in the context of the Google shopping case and the cooperation within the European Competition Network regarding hotel booking sites [see our May 2017 Newsletter]. On a national level, the ACM plans to cooperate with the Dutch Data Protection Authority and the Dutch Media Authority (DMA). In December 2017, for instance, the ACM reported that it had launched a joint study with the DMA into the effects of digitalization on the media landscape.

This position paper reaffirms that digital markets are becoming a core focus of the ACM. So far, however, the ACM has not found any indication of anticompetitive conduct or dominant market power. See, for example, our September 2017 Newsletter on the study by the ACM into the market for online video streaming platforms. It remains to be seen whether there will be an increase in enforcement action in the future.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of March 2018. Other articles in this newsletter:

  1. Court of Justice dismisses all appeals against cartel decision in the freight forwarding sector

  2. ACM publishes key priorities for 2018 and 2019

Team

Related news

02.07.2020 NL law
European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

Short Reads - The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Please share – ACM conditionally clears shared mobility platform merger

Short Reads - There may soon be a new competition tool available to tackle structural competition concerns in dynamic tech and platform markets. Until then, competition authorities resort to existing tools to deal with these markets. The Dutch competition authority (ACM) recently subjected the merger of two emerging platforms – without significant market footprint – to behavioural remedies. On 20 May 2020, the ACM cleared the merger between the travel apps of Dutch rail operator NS and transport company Pon.

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

Short Reads - Large online platforms may face more regulatory obligations, whilst non-dominant companies’ unilateral conduct may soon be curbed. The European Commission intends to tool up its kit by adding a new regulation to keep digital gatekeepers in check, as well as providing more clarity on how to define digital markets in its new Market Definition Notice.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
No proof of competitive disadvantage? No abusive favouritism

Short Reads - Companies claiming abuse of dominance in civil proceedings have their work cut out for them, as demonstrated by a ruling of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Real estate association VBO had accused dominant online platform Funda of favouritism. However, in line with the District Court’s earlier ruling, the Appeal Court dismissed the claim for insufficient evidence of negative effects on competition. The ruling confirms that the effect-based approach also applies in civil abuse claims, and that the standard of proof is high.    

Read more