Neodyum Miknatis
amateur porn
Casino Siteleri
Kayseri escort
canli poker siteleri kolaybet meritslot
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
Short Reads

Swifter merger clearance and shorter merger filings in Belgium

Swifter merger clearance and shorter merger filings in Belgium

Swifter merger clearance and shorter merger filings in Belgium

05.03.2020 NL law

Companies can expect swifter merger clearance and simpler filing rules in Belgium. The Belgian Competition Authority has published a communication with additional rules concerning the simplified procedure for certain types of concentrations. As a result, a new category of concentrations will be eligible for a simplified merger filing, leading to swifter approval and lower costs. It will also allow the BCA to focus its resources on more problematic and complex files.

The Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) has published additional rules concerning the simplified procedure for concentrations. The communication extends the existing regime to include a new category of concentrations eligible for simplified filing.

In practice, on top of the existing category of eligible concentrations, the BCA can now also apply the simplified procedure in the following circumstances:

  • when the combined market share of all the parties to the concentration with horizontal links is less than 50% and the increase in the HHI index as a consequence of the concentration is less than 150;
  • when the combined horizontal market share is less than 50% and the incremental market share increase as a result of a concentration is below 2%.

Additionally, the BCA can apply the simplified procedure when it considers – in light of all the relevant circumstances – there to be no doubt about the admissibility of the concentration, and it does not lead to objections from the market, in the following two scenarios:

  • when two more parties to the concentration have activities in the same product and geographic market, and a combined market share between 25 and 40% at a horizontal level; or
  • when one or more parties involved in the concentration has activities in the product market upstream or downstream from the product market of one of the other parties, and the individual or combined market shares at one of these levels is between 25 and 40%.

As a result, more concentrations in Belgium will be eligible for application of the simplified procedure, thereby benefitting from a shorter decision-making period and simpler filing rules, leading to lower costs. It also implies that in such procedures the Competition College (the BCA’s ultimate decision-making body) will not need to convene because, in a simplified procedure, the examining officer (Auditeur/Auditor) alone can take such decision. This new procedure will therefore also allow the Competition College to concentrate on more important files.


This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of March 2020. Other articles in this newsletter:


Related news

01.10.2020 NL law
EU merger control: Dutch clause to catch future killer acquisitions

Short Reads - Competition Commissioner Vestager presented a sneak peak of her plans for the future of EU merger control on the 30th anniversary of the EU Merger Regulation. The proposed plans include a simplification of the notification procedure and a new approach towards the system of referral to ensure that significant transactions, particularly in the digital and pharmaceutical industries, no longer escape Commission scrutiny.

Read more

07.10.2020 LU law
Luxembourg tax measures on non-cooperative jurisdictions: EU blacklist updated

Articles - On 6 October 2020, the European Union list of non-cooperative jurisdictions (the “EU List") was updated. The changes have an impact on bill of law nº 7547, providing that, as from 1 January 2021, interest or royalties, accrued or paid, should no longer be deductible for tax purposes when the beneficiary is a related enterprise established in a country included in the EU List.

Read more

01.10.2020 NL law
Waiting for the EC: third-party platform bans and RPM still on radar

Short Reads - The results of the European Commission’s evaluation of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER) call for more clarity and convergence in the interpretation of certain (online) vertical restrictions. However, the Dutch competition authority (the ACM) and the Dutch courts cannot wait for the European Commission’s revised VBER rules to deal with such sales restrictions.

Read more

01.10.2020 NL law
Directors' liability due to competition law infringements by the company

Short Reads - The District Court Noord-Nederland recently allowed the trustees in bankruptcy of Northsea shrimp trading company Heiploeg to recover part of a EUR 27 million cartel fine from a former director. Internationally, the question whether companies can recover competition law fines through civil claims against individuals involved in the competition law infringement, is controversial. The court held, however, that the director’s personal involvement in the infringement amounted to ‘serious mismanagement’, triggering personal liability to pay damages.

Read more

01.10.2020 NL law
If you can’t stand the heat: kitchen retailers fined for misleading consumers

Short Reads - There is a new enforcement trend in the Netherlands; consumer protection is shifting from private enforcement before the civil courts, to public enforcement through the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), the combined antitrust and consumer protection authority. This is not mere cheap talk from the authority; multimillion fines have already been imposed on Dutch telecom operators and a Dutch energy company, whereas fines approximating one million euro have been imposed on three kitchen retailers, all for allegedly misleading consumers.

Read more