Neodyum Miknatis
amateur porn
implant
olabahis
Casino Siteleri
Kayseri escort
canli poker siteleri kolaybet meritslot
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
Short Reads

New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

02.07.2020 NL law

Large online platforms may face more regulatory obligations, whilst non-dominant companies’ unilateral conduct may soon be curbed. The European Commission intends to tool up its kit by adding a new regulation to keep digital gatekeepers in check, as well as providing more clarity on how to define digital markets in its new Market Definition Notice.

It is also eyeing a market investigations tool, similar to that available to competition authorities in the UK and Greece. Consultations to collect stakeholders’ views on these initiatives are ongoing. Meanwhile, it is business as usual under the ‘old’ competition rules, with recently launched antitrust investigations into Apple’s conduct and possibly more frequent use of interim measures and restorative remedies.

Companies should be aware that more rules may be on the way: it is time to take stock of the potential implications for their businesses and respond accordingly to the ongoing consultations.

Something new: ex ante regulation of digital gatekeepers

Businesses are increasingly dependent on a limited number of large online platforms to connect them to consumers. These ‘gatekeeper’ platforms can use the large amounts of data gained from these connections to nip competition in the bud, for example by refusing competitors access to this data or by developing new activities in adjacent markets. Through the current consultation, the Commission intends to find ways to safeguard a fair trading environment and intensify the innovation potential and capacity across online platform ecosystems.

The suggested policy options range from revising the Platform-to-Business Regulation to include prescriptive rules on certain practices (such as ‘self-preferencing’, data access policies and unfair contractual provisions) to the introduction of a new ex ante regulatory framework for ‘gatekeeper’ online platforms, featuring blacklisted trading practices and tailor-made remedies (such as data access obligations or data portability requirements). Criteria based on significant network effects, size of user base, and ability to leverage data across markets may be used to distinguish ‘gatekeeper’ online platforms from others.

The recently launched consultation on the Market Definition Notice could also help to provide more guidance to companies on how to define product markets and geographic market, in light of increasing digitalisation.

Something borrowed: new competition tool

In parallel with the possible platform-specific ex ante regulation of digital gatekeepers, the Commission is considering a new competition tool resembling the market investigations tool available to competition authorities in the UK and Greece. In contrast to the Commission’s current power to conduct sector inquiries, this tool would allow the Commission to impose structural and behavioural remedies outside the scope of individual infringement proceedings, including the possibility of breaking up companies.

The tool aims to remedy structural market failures and prevent the creation of gatekeepers in digital and non-digital markets, without any prior finding of an infringement. The tool could either apply across all sectors or be sector-specific. Suggested options range from a dominance-based competition tool to a market structure-based tool to catch monopolising conduct by powerful non-dominant companies or tacit collusion in concentrated markets.

Something old: antitrust investigations

Irrespective of the consultations’ outcome, the Commission continues to tackle potential anti-competitive conduct under the ‘old’ competition rules. It recently launched an investigation into Apple’s App Store rules following complaints by Spotify and an e-book/audiobook distributor regarding Apple’s potential gatekeeper role. A similar investigation is ongoing at the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (see our May 2019 newsletter).

In addition, the Commission is also looking into Apple’s conduct relating to Apple Pay. The Commission has concerns about Apple's terms, conditions, and other measures related to the integration of Apple Pay for the purchase of goods and services on merchant apps and websites on iOS/iPadOS devices, as well as alleged access restrictions to Apple Pay for specific products of rivals.

Prepare, beware, react

Companies should be aware of the potential implications of the current consultations (such as more rules to abide by), and give their reactions to the consultations before preparing for possible upcoming rules. The feedback period for both consultations ends on 8 September 2020. Based on the input received, the Commission intends to publish a proposal for implementing its plans by the end of this year.

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of July 2020. Other articles in this newsletter:

Team

Related news

01.10.2020 NL law
EU merger control: Dutch clause to catch future killer acquisitions

Short Reads - Competition Commissioner Vestager presented a sneak peak of her plans for the future of EU merger control on the 30th anniversary of the EU Merger Regulation. The proposed plans include a simplification of the notification procedure and a new approach towards the system of referral to ensure that significant transactions, particularly in the digital and pharmaceutical industries, no longer escape Commission scrutiny.

Read more

07.10.2020 LU law
Luxembourg tax measures on non-cooperative jurisdictions: EU blacklist updated

Articles - On 6 October 2020, the European Union list of non-cooperative jurisdictions (the “EU List") was updated. The changes have an impact on bill of law nº 7547, providing that, as from 1 January 2021, interest or royalties, accrued or paid, should no longer be deductible for tax purposes when the beneficiary is a related enterprise established in a country included in the EU List.

Read more

01.10.2020 NL law
Waiting for the EC: third-party platform bans and RPM still on radar

Short Reads - The results of the European Commission’s evaluation of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER) call for more clarity and convergence in the interpretation of certain (online) vertical restrictions. However, the Dutch competition authority (the ACM) and the Dutch courts cannot wait for the European Commission’s revised VBER rules to deal with such sales restrictions.

Read more

01.10.2020 NL law
Directors' liability due to competition law infringements by the company

Short Reads - The District Court Noord-Nederland recently allowed the trustees in bankruptcy of Northsea shrimp trading company Heiploeg to recover part of a EUR 27 million cartel fine from a former director. Internationally, the question whether companies can recover competition law fines through civil claims against individuals involved in the competition law infringement, is controversial. The court held, however, that the director’s personal involvement in the infringement amounted to ‘serious mismanagement’, triggering personal liability to pay damages.

Read more

01.10.2020 NL law
If you can’t stand the heat: kitchen retailers fined for misleading consumers

Short Reads - There is a new enforcement trend in the Netherlands; consumer protection is shifting from private enforcement before the civil courts, to public enforcement through the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), the combined antitrust and consumer protection authority. This is not mere cheap talk from the authority; multimillion fines have already been imposed on Dutch telecom operators and a Dutch energy company, whereas fines approximating one million euro have been imposed on three kitchen retailers, all for allegedly misleading consumers.

Read more