Neodyum Miknatis
amateur porn
implant
olabahis
Casino Siteleri
Kayseri escort
canli poker siteleri kolaybet meritslot
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
Short Reads

Report of advisory committee on taxation of multinationals in the Netherlands

Report of advisory committee on taxation of multinationals in the Net

Report of advisory committee on taxation of multinationals in the Netherlands

18.04.2020 EU law

On 5 June 2019, the Dutch Lower House of Parliament adopted a motion that called on the Government to initiate and set up a committee of experts (‘the Committee’) with the purpose to investigate measures that would make the taxation of profits of multinationals fairer, while the Netherlands would remain attractive for Dutch head offices. Last Wednesday (15 April 2020), the Dutch State Secretary of Finance sent the report of the Committee to the Dutch Lower House of Parliament.

The Committee has identified several areas that can contribute to an ‘unbalanced’ payment of taxes by multinationals. The Committee’s advice is threefold. The Committee finds (i) that more data should be collected to increase insight into the amounts of taxes that multinationals pay, (ii) the Netherlands should broaden its tax base unilaterally and (iii) that international cooperation is the best way to a well-functioning international tax system. The report is currently under review of the Dutch State Secretary of Finance. In this Tax Alert, we summarize the key features of this report.

1. Unilateral approach

The Committee identifies several problem areas that in, their opinion, contribute to an ‘unbalanced’ payment of taxes by multinationals. The Committee therefore recommends a ‘basic package’ with seven measures that should make the Dutch corporate income tax (‘CIT’) system more fair, whilst the Dutch business climate remains attractive. While the revenues of this basic package are still uncertain, the Committee estimates an additional EUR 600 million of revenue per year.

The measures proposed by the Committee aim to achieve two objectives: (i) creating a minimum Dutch CIT base for profitable Dutch businesses and (ii) the elimination of mismatches between the Dutch tax system and the tax system of other jurisdictions.

Currently it is possible that businesses with profitable activities in the Netherlands do not pay taxes in the Netherlands. This often is due to the possibility to utilize losses from prior years that are available for carry forward.1 To make sure that businesses pay Dutch CIT once they make profits in the Netherlands, the Committee proposes to restrict the set-off of net operating losses in a given tax year to a maximum of 50% of the taxable profits in such year. This would be combined with an unlimited period of carry forward of losses and a threshold of EUR 1 million. As a consequence of the threshold, the first EUR 1 million of taxable profit may annually be off set in full against available tax losses. Similar limitations are proposed relating to other deductible expenses, such as shareholder costs and (subject to further review) royalties. The second objective is to prevent multinationals from benefiting from differences between tax systems of different jurisdictions, as a consequence of which they lower their tax burden. We refer to the table below showing the proposed measures in the basic package.

Tax Alert - Tabel 1 website

* As a result of the threshold of EUR 1 million, the first EUR 1 million of taxable profit may annually be off set in full against available tax losses.
** As a result of this measure, the deduction of payments of interest (e.g. based on the existing earnings-stripping rule), shareholder costs (A2) and (possibly, after further investigation) royalties (A3) would be limited not only separately, but also as an overall total.
*** CFC stands for Controlled Foreign Company.
**** In a letter to the Dutch Lower House of Parliament dated 23 February 2018, the State Secretary of Finance announced that he would investigate whether the Dutch arm’s length principle needed changing, specifically because the unilateral downward transfer pricing adjustment of the taxable profit in the Netherlands is not always related to a corresponding upward adjustment of the taxable profit in other jurisdictions. The outcome of this investigation is expected this year. 

In addition to the basic package, several additional measures have been proposed. These additional measures have not been included in the basic package because there was no consensus amongst the members of the Committee on the desirability of these measures. Some of these additional measures can be linked to the main objectives described above. Other additional measures are of a more general nature. We refer to the table below.

Tax Alert - Tabel 2 website

*Dutch Corporate Income Tax Act 1969 (Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969).
**As of 2021, a conditional withholding tax will apply on interest and royalty payments to low tax jurisdictions (as set out in the list referred to in article 1.2, paragraph 1, sub e of the Dutch Withholding Tax Act 2021 (Wet bronbelasting 2021)). The proposed measure implies a non-conditional withholding tax, which means that withholding tax on interest and royalty payments would generally be due, unless the EU Interest and Royalty Directive or a tax treaty limits such taxation. Implementation of such a tax levy could also affect business driven (non-artificial) situations.

 
To counterbalance the previous measures, the Committee also proposed some compensating measures which are included in the table below.

Tax Alert - Tabel 3 website

* For 2020, the standard CIT rate is 25%. However, the CIT rate for the first bracket of EUR 200.000 in profit has been reduced from 19% to 16.5%. For 2021, the rates have already (outside the scope of this proposal) been proposed to be lowered to 15% and 21.7% respectively.
** The legislator previously announced its intention to increase the effective tax rate for profits derived from self-developed intangible assets from 7% to 9%.
*** Costs incurred in relation to the acquisition or disposal of a participation in a subsidiary are generally treated as non-deductible ‘acquisition or disposal costs under the Dutch participation exemption. One of the compensating rules would be to no longer restrict the deductibility of such expenses or, alternatively, to include these costs in the already existing earning stripping rule. The Committee distinguishes these costs from shareholder costs (of which the Committee recommends to limit the deductibility under measure A2) and interest costs relating to the acquisition of participations (of which the Committee recommends to limit the deductibility under measure B2). According to the Committee, shareholder costs are structural, while costs incurred in relation to the acquisition or disposal of a participation are more incidental in nature and may form a significant part of the costs of a taxpayer in a given year. Also, the Committee finds that costs incurred in relation to the acquisition or disposal of a participation (e.g. costs related to due diligence, advisory fees etcetera) do not lend themselves well to tax planning and cannot be on-charged to the relevant participation, as opposed to interest costs relating to the acquisition of participations.

2. International approach

The Committee recommends the Netherlands to work more closely together with other jurisdictions to avoid undesirable strategic behavior from multinationals. After all, the Committee finds international cooperation the best way to a well-functioning international tax system. The Netherlands must in their opinion show that it is fully supportive when working out international arrangements (e.g. for a consolidated tax base (potentially within the EU)), by aiming at allocation rules that cannot be manipulated, by introducing a minimum tax rate and by limiting the preferential treatment of debt.

3. Collecting data and additional research

The Committee acknowledges that there is no full picture of the taxes paid by multinationals. This is due to confidentiality and the fact that over the past few years a large number of tax measures have been implemented in the Dutch CITA and the effect of these measurements is still unknown. The Committee argues therefore for more research and additional possibilities regarding the collection of company data.

4. Corona crisis

The recommendations made by the Committee are based on the economic situation prior to the COVID-19 crisis. In the media, the Committee chairman said that he is aware that the global economy is currently in a very difficult phase, but states that in tough economic times like these, it is important that not one group of businesses has more opportunities to reduce their tax burden than others. According to the chairman, this makes the Committee’s analysis and vision on fairer taxation without compromising the Dutch business climate even more relevant.

5. Next steps

The Dutch State Secretary of Finance has now presented the report of the Committee to the Dutch Lower House of Parliament and stated in the accompanying cover letter that he will review the recommendations of the Committee. The Dutch State Secretary of Finance expects to provide the Lower House of Parliament in the course of the summer of 2020 with a policy response.

More about the coronavirus

You can read more publications on the impact of the coronavirus on our website. Here you will also find a list of contacts within our organisation who can advise you with questions about the implications of the coronavirus for your company.

 

1. We note that as from 2019 the utilization of losses has already been restricted due to the limitation of the carry forward period from nine years to six years.

Team

Related news

29.10.2020 NL law
E-book NOW-3: Derde tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid

Articles - Op 28 augustus 2020 kondigde de regering het derde noodpakket aan met maatregelen om de economie te blijven ondersteunen. De huidige tweede golf en de daaropvolgende aanscherping van de maatregelen laten zien dat het belang van dit derde noodpakket onverminderd groot is. Onderdeel van het noodpakket is de Derde tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid (NOW-3). Werkgevers kunnen hiervoor vanaf 16 november 2020 een aanvraag indienen.

Read more

21.10.2020 NL law
Doorberekenen 100% loonkosten onredelijk vanwege doel NOW-regeling (annotatie)

Articles - De vraag in hoeverre afspraken over arbeidsvoorwaarden, zoals loon, bonussen en onkostenvergoedingen, kunnen worden gewijzigd is vanwege de coronacrisis een actueel arbeidsrechtelijk vraagstuk. Cao’s en individuele afspraken tussen werkgevers en werknemers, die voorafgaand aan de coronacrisis zijn gesloten, komen hierdoor op losse schroeven te staan.

Read more

15.10.2020 NL law
Coronaboetes voorgelegd aan rechter

Short Reads - Het Openbaar Ministerie (OM) liet eind september weten dat er circa 17.200 strafbeschikkingen zijn uitgevaardigd wegens het overtreden van de corona-noodverordeningen, voornamelijk vanwege het houden van onvoldoende afstand. Een groot aantal mensen heeft verzet ingesteld tegen de strafbeschikking. Zulke zaken worden voorgelegd aan de rechter, tenzij de officier van justitie de strafbeschikking intrekt.  Inmiddels hebben rechters de eerste coronaboetes beoordeeld.

Read more

12.10.2020 NL law
De NOW-3: wat verandert er ten opzichte van de NOW-1 en de NOW-2?

Short Reads - De regering kondigde op 28 augustus 2020 het derde noodpakket aan om de economie ten tijde van de coronacrisis te blijven ondersteunen. Onderdeel van dit noodpakket is de Derde tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid (“NOW-3”). Op 9 oktober 2020 is de NOW-3 gepubliceerd in de Staatscourant. Dit bericht geeft een kort overzicht van de hoofdlijnen van de NOW-3. Tevens komen de belangrijkste verschillen met de NOW-1 en de NOW-2 aan bod. 

Read more