Short Reads

Brand owners beware: Commission tough on cross-border sales restrictions

Brand owners beware: Commission tough on cross-border sales restricti

Brand owners beware: Commission tough on cross-border sales restrictions

01.08.2019 NL law

The European Commission recently imposed a EUR 6.2 million fine on Hello Kitty owner Sanrio for preventing its licensees from selling licensed merchandising products across the entire EEA. Sanrio is the second licensor (after Nike) to be fined for imposing territorial sales restrictions on its non-exclusive licensees for licensed merchandise. A third investigation into allegedly similar practices by Universal Studios is ongoing. The case confirms the Commission's determination to tackle these practices, regardless of type or form.

This should represent a clear call for companies to double-check their distribution and licensing agreements for cross-border sales restrictions, and take any necessary action.

According to the Commission's press release, Sanrio's non-exclusive licensing agreements infringed EU competition rules by containing clauses i) explicitly prohibiting out-of-territory sales by licensees, ii) committing licensees to refer orders for out-of-territory sales to Sanrio, and iii) limiting the languages used on the merchandising products. Sanrio kept tabs on the licensees' compliance with these territorial restrictions, and made clear the consequences of non-compliance, by conducting audits and refusing to renew contracts with non-abiding licensees. In line with the Commission's practice rewarding cooperation outside cartel cases [see our January 2018 Newsletter], Sanrio obtained a 40% fine reduction for having cooperated beyond its legal obligation to do so.

The fine on Sanrio fits into the Commission's increased focus on vertical restraints, initiated by its 2017 e-commerce sector report [see our June 2017 Newsletter]. Fines have already been imposed for (online and offline) resale price maintenance and territorial restrictions. National competition authorities, such as the Dutch ACM, the French Autorité de la Concurrence and the German Bundeskartellamt, are also stepping up the pace in the quest against vertical restrictions.

The review of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER), due to expire in 2022, could therefore not have come at a better time. Not only is a uniform approach on how to enforce vertical restrictions among EU competition authorities long overdue, more guidance and clarity would also benefit companies when concluding vertical agreements. According to the evaluation roadmap, the VBER's review should be ready by the second quarter of next year. It will therefore soon be clearer whether good things indeed come to those who wait.

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of August 2019. Other articles in this newsletter:

 

Team

Related news

24.09.2020 BE law
Stibbe hosts a webinar on dawn raids organised by IBJ/IJE

Seminar - On 24 September 2020, several Stibbe lawyers ​​​​​explain the rights and obligations of companies when confronted with announced or unannounced raids. What do to when, for example, tax authorities, the competition authorities, police services or a bailiff are at your doorstep?

Read more

03.09.2020 NL law
Home, but not alone: Commission may complete dawn raids from home

Short Reads - The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has rejected Nexans’ appeal in the power cables cartel case. The Commission started the dawn raid at Nexans’ premises, but due to lack of time finished the raid at the Commission’s premises in Brussels. The ECJ found that the Commission can copy data and assess its relevance to the investigation at its own premises, while safeguarding companies’ rights of defence.

Read more

03.09.2020 NL law
COVID-19 impacts level and payment of antitrust fines

Short Reads - As well as granting companies leeway on certain COVID-19 initiated collaborations (see our May 2020 newsletter), the coronavirus outbreak has also led competition authorities to take a more lenient stance towards fine calculations and payments. The European Commission has extended the due date for fine payments by an additional three months in response to potential short-term liquidity issues brought about by the pandemic. Similar reasons led the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeal Tribunal to reduce a EUR 1 million cartel fine to just EUR 10,000.

Read more

03.09.2020 NL law
The ACM’s Green Deal: achieving sustainability via competition law?

Short Reads - The ACM has issued draft guidelines on the application of competition law to sustainability agreements. Companies entering into agreements that restrict competition but contribute to governmental sustainability objectives – i.e. lower CO2 emissions – may expect more room for collaboration. The proposed framework would allow these types of agreements if their anti-competitive effects are outweighed by their environmental benefits to society as a whole (rather than to in-market consumers only, as under the existing framework).

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

Short Reads - The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

Read more