Articles

Standard Contractual Clauses debate referred to the CJEU

Standard Contractual Clauses debate referred to the CJEU

Standard Contractual Clauses debate referred to the CJEU

04.10.2017 BE law

On 3 October 2017, the Irish Court referred to the CJUE for a preliminary ruling on the validity of the SCC Decisions.

Max Schrems, after his successful claim seeking the invalidity of the US-EU Safe Harbor decision, complained to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner ("DPC") about the transfer of his personal data from Facebook Ireland to Facebook Inc. in the United States of America.

More precisely, Max Schrems challenged the validity of the agreement between Facebook Ireland and Facebook Inc., which was concluded on the basis of a decision of the European Commission authorizing the transfer of data from EEA-based data exporters to data importers outside the EEA on the basis of standard contractual clauses ("SCC").

The Irish DPC decided to refer this question on the validity of three European Commission Decisions (i.e. Commission Decision 2001/497/EC of 15 June 2001, Commission Decision 2001/915/EC of 27 December 2004, and Commission Decision 2010/87/EU of 5 February 2010 (the "SCC Decisions") to the Irish High Court.

In its decision, the Irish High Court stated: "European Union law guarantees a high level of protection to EU citizens as regards the processing of their personal data within the EU. They are entitled to an equivalent high level of protection when their personal data are transferred outside the EEA." Further, as the court finds that the DPC has raised well-founded concerns regarding the validity of the SCC Decisions, it decided to refer the case to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling.

The full decision can be found here

 

 

Team

Related news

03.07.2020 NL law
E-book NOW-2: Second Temporary Emergency Bridging Measure Work Retention

Articles - On 17 March 2020, the Dutch cabinet announced the first emergency package of support measures to alleviate the economic consequences of the corona crisis. This emergency package inter alia comprised the First Temporary Emergency Bridging Measure for the purpose of Work Retention (“NOW-1”) and the Temporary Bridging Measure for Self-Employed Persons (“Tozo-1”).

Read more

03.07.2020 NL law
E-book NOW-2: Tweede tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid

Articles - Op 17 maart 2020 kondigde het kabinet het eerste noodpakket aan met steunmaatregelen om de economische gevolgen van de coronacrisis te dempen. Onderdeel van dit noodpakket zijn onder andere de Eerste tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid (“NOW-1”) en de Tijdelijke overbruggingsregeling zelfstandige ondernemers (“Tozo-1”).

Read more

20.05.2020 NL law
Stibbe in Amsterdam answers questions from consumers, small business foundations and NGOs about the coronavirus [updated]

Inside Stibbe - In a special Q&A (in Dutch), lawyers from our Amsterdam office share their legal expertise and strive to provide answers to questions put to us by consumers, self-employed persons, enterprises large and small, foundations and NGOs as a result of the corona crisis.

Read more

07.05.2020 NL law
E-book 'De huidige NOW en de verwachte wijzigingen in de nieuwe/verlengde NOW (NOW 2.0)'

Articles - Op 1 april 2020 werd de Tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid gepubliceerd (“NOW”). Sinds 6 april 2020 is het UWV-loket geopend en kunnen werkgevers een aanvraag doen voor loonkostensubsidie onder de NOW. Op 30 april 2020 waren er ongeveer 114.000 aanvragen ingediend bij het UWV.

Read more