Short Reads

Proposals to amend EMIR – what does this mean for corporates?

Proposals to amend EMIR – what does this mean for corporates?

04.08.2017 NL law

On 4 May 2017 and 13 June 2017, the European Commission published two proposals to amend the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). After almost five years since EMIR entered into force, these proposals aim to lower the costs of compliance for market participants without compromising the objective of reducing systemic risks in the OTC derivatives market. The May 2017 proposal aims to reduce the regulatory burdens for corporates. The June 2017 proposal introduces a more pan-European approach to supervision of EU CCPs and ensures further supervisory convergence.

The most important proposals of the May 2017 proposal are as follows:

  • Pension funds will again benefit from a three-year exemption from the clearing obligation.
  • Non-Financial Counterparties (NFCs) that breach a clearing threshold must only clear those asset classes for which they have breached the threshold. This is different to the current regime, which provides that NFCs that breach a clearing threshold of a certain asset class will be subject to the clearing obligation for all derivatives.
  • Clearing thresholds will be introduced for Financial Counterparties (FCs); clearing will not be mandatory for every FC.
  • There will be several changes with respect to the reporting obligation:
    • Derivatives concluded on exchanges will be reported only by CCPs on behalf of both counterparties.
    • Transactions between an FC and a small NFC will have to be reported by the FC on behalf of both parties.
    • Intragroup transactions will no longer have to be reported if one of the counterparties is an NFC.
    • The manager of an alternative investment fund (AIF) or, in case of a UCITS, its management company, is responsible for reporting instead of the fund itself.
    • The obligation to report historic data (backloading) is abolished.
  • There will be two new major changes of the definition of an FC:
    • Special purpose entities, for instance those used in securitization structures, will fall under this definition; and
    • AIFs and UCITS, even if they are not authorized in accordance with the applicable Directives, will fall under this definition. This is different to the current wording of EMIR, which only refers to such entities to the extent they are authorized.

Most changes are indeed expected to result in a reduction of the regulatory burdens for corporates. However, the broader scope of the definition of FCs will mean that more parties will qualify as an FC. The European Commission did not explain why these parties must qualify as such. This will not only lead to additional burdens for investment funds, but will also affect the securitization market. In addition, based on the current proposed wording, EMIR will have a more extra-territorial effect since all special purpose entities, AIFs and UCITS that qualify as such will fall within the scope of this definition, regardless of where they are situated. It is of course possible that the final text of the amendment of EMIR will include a more nuanced definition of an FC in this respect. 


Related news

25.04.2018 EU law
25 April 2018: Stibbe sponsors LPEA Insights conference in Luxembourg on 'Building the Real Economy'

Conference - LPEA, Luxembourg Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, organises a conference in Luxembourg, which brings on stage General Partners (GPs) and Limited Partners (LPs) to discuss and showcase the private equity sector from the perspective of local practitioners, together with additional contributions from guest speakers specially invited to the event. Stibbe Luxembourg is a proud sponsor of this event, which some of our lawyers will attend.  

Read more

05.03.2018 EU law
8 & 9 March 2018: Jan Bogaert speaks on shareholder activism

Conference - The International Bar Association organizes the 3rd IBA Asia-based International Financial Law Conference. The conference attracts  industry leaders, regulators, in-house counsels (including Alibaba, Ant Financial, Tencent, CICC etc) and leading practitioners from across Asia, Europe and the US.

Read more

19.03.2018 EU law
The third-party effects of cross-border assignments of claims – Draft EU Regulation aiming to achieve legal certainty

Short Reads - On 12 March 2018, the European Commission (EC) published proposals on covered bonds, cross-border distribution of investment funds and cross-border transactions in claims and securities. The proposals are linked to the 2015 Action Plan on Capital Markets Union (CMU) and the European Commission's Mid-term Review that was published in June 2017.

Read more

24.01.2018 NL law
De rechtspositie van financiële instellingen ten aanzien van richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen van European Supervisory Authorities: Europese pseudowetgeving?

Articles - De ESA’s hebben in de praktijk een belangrijke functie binnen het Europese toezichtsmechanisme. Ze spelen een rol bij de totstandkoming van technische reguleringsnormen en uitvoeringsnormen en zij stellen richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen vast teneinde de gemeenschappelijke, uniforme en consistente toepassing van het Unierecht te verzekeren. Deze richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen worden wel geschaard onder de noemer ‘soft law’ en zijn niet juridisch bindend. Toch sorteren zij in de praktijk effecten die lijken op de effecten die ‘bindend recht’ sorteert.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring