Short Reads

Changes on asset segregation rules applicable to investment firms

Changes on asset segregation rules applicable to investment firms

06.04.2017 NL law

Effective 1 February 2017, changes to the client asset segregation obligation (vermogensscheiding) applicable to investment firms have been implemented in the Netherlands.

Effective 1 February 2017, changes to the asset segregation obligation (vermogensscheiding) to protect client funds have been implemented in the Further regulation on the supervision of the business conduct of financial undertakings (Financial Supervision Act) (Nadere regeling gedragstoezicht financiële ondernemingen Wft).

The Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten, the "AFM") consulted market parties on the amendment rounds. Based on this feedback, the AFM maintained what is known as the investors giro system (beleggersgiro) as an acceptable asset segregation system. The investors giro system segregates the clients' assets by means of a separate entity that has the administration of the assets of that investment firm's clients as its sole purpose. The AFM did add a number of conditions to the investors giro system and changed the name of the investors giro system to 'common depository' (bewaarinstelling). The AFM clarified that an investment firm that holds securities through a 'common depository' provides the service 'custody and administration of financial instruments on behalf of clients' as a ancillary service within the meaning of MiFID.

The AFM now also expressly confirms that investment firms without a banking licence can rely on the regime under the Dutch Securities Book-Entry Transfer Act (Wet op het giraal effectenverkeer, "Wge") when segregating the assets of their clients. This means that as long as the investment firm holds client funds in accordance with the requirements of the Wge, the asset segregation obligation is deemed to be complied with. In that case, the use of a bankruptcy remote custody vehicle is no longer required nor is it desirable, in the view of the AFM.

If an investment firm holds a banking licence, the requirement to segregate clients' assets is restricted to financial instruments (e.g. securities), and not to cash. Such an investment firm was already entitled to hold the financial instruments in accordance with the Wge, or with a separate securities depository (effectenbewaarbedrijf).

Investment firms that will negotiate a new agreement with their 'common depositary', should take the new conditions attached to the 'common depository' into account. Investment firms without a banking licence should decide whether or not they want to segregate their clients' assets in line with the Wge.


Related news

25.04.2018 EU law
25 April 2018: Stibbe sponsors LPEA Insights conference in Luxembourg on 'Building the Real Economy'

Conference - LPEA, Luxembourg Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, organises a conference in Luxembourg, which brings on stage General Partners (GPs) and Limited Partners (LPs) to discuss and showcase the private equity sector from the perspective of local practitioners, together with additional contributions from guest speakers specially invited to the event. Stibbe Luxembourg is a proud sponsor of this event, which some of our lawyers will attend.  

Read more

05.03.2018 EU law
8 & 9 March 2018: Jan Bogaert speaks on shareholder activism

Conference - The International Bar Association organizes the 3rd IBA Asia-based International Financial Law Conference. The conference attracts  industry leaders, regulators, in-house counsels (including Alibaba, Ant Financial, Tencent, CICC etc) and leading practitioners from across Asia, Europe and the US.

Read more

19.03.2018 EU law
The third-party effects of cross-border assignments of claims – Draft EU Regulation aiming to achieve legal certainty

Short Reads - On 12 March 2018, the European Commission (EC) published proposals on covered bonds, cross-border distribution of investment funds and cross-border transactions in claims and securities. The proposals are linked to the 2015 Action Plan on Capital Markets Union (CMU) and the European Commission's Mid-term Review that was published in June 2017.

Read more

24.01.2018 NL law
De rechtspositie van financiële instellingen ten aanzien van richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen van European Supervisory Authorities: Europese pseudowetgeving?

Articles - De ESA’s hebben in de praktijk een belangrijke functie binnen het Europese toezichtsmechanisme. Ze spelen een rol bij de totstandkoming van technische reguleringsnormen en uitvoeringsnormen en zij stellen richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen vast teneinde de gemeenschappelijke, uniforme en consistente toepassing van het Unierecht te verzekeren. Deze richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen worden wel geschaard onder de noemer ‘soft law’ en zijn niet juridisch bindend. Toch sorteren zij in de praktijk effecten die lijken op de effecten die ‘bindend recht’ sorteert.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring