Short Reads

Ban on advertisement of high-risk financial products to retail parties in the Netherlands

Ban on advertisement of high-risk financial products to retail parties in the Netherlands

06.04.2017 NL law

Effective 1 July 2017, financial institutions are prohibited to promote financial products that are considered as "high-risk" by the Dutch regulator. The prohibition will apply to binary options, warrants, contingent convertibles issued by banks (CoCo's), contracts for difference, specialty derivative products known as "turbos", futures and payday loans (flitskredieten).

Background

Recent studies by the European Securities and Markets Authority, the European Banking Authority and several national regulators within the EU showed that high-risk financial products can be offered to retail investors. These financial products are considered high-risk because of their speculative and complex nature and are mostly offered and sold through online execution only platforms. These aspects expose retail investors with no experience in investing to the risks associated with investing in such financial products.

To prevent this risk, a new Article 56a will be included in the Dutch Market Conduct Supervision Decree (Besluit Gedragstoezicht financiële ondernemingen) prohibiting financial institutions from promoting several high-risk financial products as determined by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten, the "AFM"). The consultation period ended on 20 March 2017. Several market parties critically reviewed the new prohibition and state that the scope is too broad. The reactions can be found here.

Although these high-risk financial products do not constitute a large part of the financial market, the high risks associated with investing in them require the protection of retail investors. The AFM therefore considers this advertisement ban as an important instrument in its battle against parties offering high-risk financial products that the AFM considers undesirable for a retail audience. An example of this is the rejection of the licence of a party that offers binary options. The Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ruled that the AFM was not allowed to reject the licence simply because the AFM considers binary options undesirable for a retail audience. For a more detailed overview of this judgement, please see our previous newsletter here.

Practical implications of the advertisement ban

The advertisement ban will mean that financial institutions will no longer be able to promote binary options, warrants, contingent convertibles issued by banks (CoCo's), contracts for difference, specialty derivative products known as "turbos", futures and payday loans (flitskredieten). This prohibition will apply to all online and offline advertisements directed at retail investors in the Netherlands. The Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht) defines an "advertisement" as any form of provision of information recommending a specific financial service or product. Whether an advertisement is directed at retail investors in the Netherlands must be determined according to the criteria developed by the European Court of Justice in the cases Pammer and Alpenhof.

No ban on the offering of high-risk financial products

The advertisement ban does not introduce a ban on giving advice on or offering these high-risk financial products to retail investors in the Netherlands. Also, the advertisement ban does not affect the obligation for financial institutions offering high-risk financial products to provide retail parties with the required key investor information. However, the advertisement ban requires that this key investor information must be of a factual nature and may not contain any recommendations, marketing language or attractive features. This requirement applies to both the content (text) and the layout of the key investor information.

It is expected that the advertisement ban will enter into force on 1 July 2017.

Team

Related news

24.01.2018 NL law
De rechtspositie van financiële instellingen ten aanzien van richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen van European Supervisory Authorities: Europese pseudowetgeving?

Articles - De ESA’s hebben in de praktijk een belangrijke functie binnen het Europese toezichtsmechanisme. Ze spelen een rol bij de totstandkoming van technische reguleringsnormen en uitvoeringsnormen en zij stellen richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen vast teneinde de gemeenschappelijke, uniforme en consistente toepassing van het Unierecht te verzekeren. Deze richtsnoeren en aanbevelingen worden wel geschaard onder de noemer ‘soft law’ en zijn niet juridisch bindend. Toch sorteren zij in de praktijk effecten die lijken op de effecten die ‘bindend recht’ sorteert.

Read more

18.01.2018 NL law
UBO-register moet medio 2018 operationeel zijn

Short Reads - Medio 2018 zal volgens de voormalige staatssecretaris van Financiën het Ultimate Beneficial Owner (“UBO”) register (“UBO-register”) in Nederland operationeel moeten zijn. In dit register dienen rechtspersonen zelf informatie over hun UBO bij te houden. Het UBO-register moet helpen voorkomen dat het financiële stelsel wordt gebruikt voor het witwassen van geld of voor terrorismefinanciering. Er is tot op heden nog geen wetsvoorstel ingediend. 

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy and Cookie Policy