Short Reads

English Court enforces arbitral award including a contractual penalty

English Court enforces arbitral award including a contractual penalty

English Court enforces arbitral award including a contractual penalty

05.02.2016 EU law

The English High Court has enforced a Swiss-seated arbitral award (the Award) issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), notwithstanding that the Award ordered a payment representing enforcement of a contractual penalty.

The claimant entered into two contracts with an Italian football club regarding the sale of financial rights consisting of the "registration rights" of a football player. The contracts required payment by instalments. The second contract was governed by Swiss private law and provided for arbitration under the rules of the CAS. After the football club had failed to pay a sum due, the claimant launched arbitration proceedings. The CAS arbitration panel ordered that the football club pay a sum which included the payments due and an additional Penalty Sum on the basis of a provision of Swiss law, providing that a judge should reduce a contractual penalty which is considered excessive. On appeal by the club, the Award was upheld by the Swiss court. The claimant subsequently sought to enforce the Award in England.

Punishing clauses are not enforceable under English law. The Court did however not consider that the Award of the penalty was contrary to public policy regulation for the purposes of Article V(II) of the New York Convention 1958. The Court concluded that the prohibition of the enforcement of penalty clauses does not protect a "universal principle of morality" and the penalty clause was not "injurious to the public good" to the extent that enforcement thereof should automatically be refused.  On this basis, the governing law as applied by the CAS arbitration panel was considered by the Court. The parties had chosen Swiss law as the law governing the contract and the CAS had exercised its power to reduce the penalty, so that this reduction was found compliant with Swiss law.

The decision is groundbreaking in the context of international transactions, in which the parties may choose a governing law of a particular jurisdiction to govern their contractual obligations, in casu Swiss law, but may look to another jurisdiction for enforcement.  It is particularly important given that penalty clauses are a relatively regular feature in transactions in many sectors and jurisdictions. 

 

Team

Related news

02.08.2021 NL law
Curaçaose rechter: ontslag op staande voet wegens weigeren coronavaccin nietig

Short Reads - Een unicum. Een rechter binnen het Nederlandse koninkrijk heeft zich voor het eerst uitgelaten over het ontslag van een werkneemster die het coronavaccin weigert. Het Gerecht in eerste aanleg van Curaçao heeft in zijn uitspraak van 16 juli 2021 geoordeeld dat het ontslag op staande voet van een werkneemster nietig is. Wel wordt de arbeidsovereenkomst van de werkneemster ontbonden wegens verandering van omstandigheden. In deze short read bespreken wij deze uitspraak van de Curaçaose rechter.

Read more

29.07.2021 NL law
De NOW-4: grotendeels gelijk aan de NOW-3 met enkele wijzigingen

Short Reads - Het kabinet kondigde in de Kamerbrief van 27 mei 2021 het vierde noodpakket aan om de economie ten tijde van de coronacrisis te blijven ondersteunen. Onderdeel van dit noodpakket is de Vierde tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid (“NOW-4”). Op 23 juli 2021 is de NOW-4 gepubliceerd in de Staatscourant. Deze short read geeft een kort overzicht van de hoofdlijnen van de NOW-4 en de wijzigingen ten opzichte van de NOW-3.

Read more