Short Reads

Update on offshore wind energy: SDE+ Subsidy and Permit tender Borssele Wind Farm Sites I and II open as of 10 April 2016

Update on offshore wind energy: SDE+ Subsidy and Permit tender Borssele Wind Farm Sites I and II open as of 10 April 2016

Update on offshore wind energy: SDE+ Subsidy and Permit tender Borssele Wind Farm Sites I and II open as of 10 April 2016

12.04.2016 NL law

Opening of SDE+ Subsidy and Permit tender Borssele Wind Farm Sites

On 8 April 2016, the final Wind Farm Site Decisions I and II (Kavelbesluit I en II windenenergiegebied Borssele) were published in the Government Gazette (Staatscourant). This was the last formal hurdle to be overcome in order for the first Borssele subsidy tender to open.

The application forms in respect of the tender can be downloaded from the website mijn.rvo.nl. The tender opened on 10 April 2016 and applications can be submitted from 11 April 2016 up to and including 12 May 2016, 17.00 CEST.

The subsidy and permits shall be granted to the applicant that fulfills all legal requirements and needs the least subsidy. In other words: the applicant with the lowest bid price per kWh is ranked the highest.

Wind Farm Site Decisions I and II

Several of the legal requirements that have to be fulfilled are laid down in the Wind Farm Site Decisions I and II. These Site Decisions, as published on 8 April 2016, can be found here:

Interested parties, that have submitted a notice of objection against the draft Site Decisions, may lodge an appeal within six (6) weeks with the Council of State (Raad van State).

Amendment Power Plant Policy Rule

On 8 April 2016, the Amendment Power Plant Policy Rule (Beleidsregel wijziging productie-installatie) was also made available. In this policy rule, it is stated that – together with the application for the provision of subsidy – a plan has to be submitted for the use and exploitation of the wind farm. The Renewable Energy Production Incentive Scheme Decree (Besluit stimulering duurzame energieproductie) requires the subsidy recipient to realize and exploit the wind farm in accordance with such plan. It is expected that the winner of the tender has not yet finalized all financial arrangements and agreements with suppliers at the moment of provision of the subsidy. Therefore, it is deemed desirable that there is some flexibility as to certain aspects of the wind farm, e.g. because the turbine type described cannot be purchased for the expected price or because better turbines have become available. Furthermore, a more detailed investigation may disclose that the turbines can be positioned more efficiently. In the Renewable Energy Production Incentive Scheme Decree it is stipulated that an exemption can be granted to deviate from the plan originally submitted. Specifications in respect of such exemption are laid down in the Amendment Power Plant Policy Rule.

Wind Farm Site Decisions III, IV and V

The draft Wind Farm Site Decisions III, IV and V were also made available on 8 April 2016 (please click here to view the draft Wind Farm Site Decisions III, IV and V (in Dutch)).

The opening of the second tender (Borssele Wind Farm Sites III, IV and V) is expected in August 2016.

For an overview of all English posts published on Stibbeblog regarding Offshore Wind Energy, please click here.

The post Update on offshore wind energy: SDE+ Subsidy and Permit tender Borssele Wind Farm Sites I and II open as of 10 April 2016 is a post of Stibbeblog

Team

Related news

20.04.2018 NL law
Impact of the Energy Transition Act (wet VET) on the activities of system operators and energy suppliers

Short Reads - Legislative background On 22 December 2015, the Dutch Senate rejected the legislative proposal "STROOM", which included provisions to effectuate the Dutch Energy Agreement (Energieakkoord), by the narrowest of margins. Subsequently, a substantively similar legislative proposal, the Energy Transition Act (wet VET) was tabled and then shelved, as it was declared "controversial" by the Dutch House of Representatives, meaning that debate on the proposal was postponed until the new Dutch government was in office.

Read more

20.04.2018 NL law
De harmonisering van milieuzones

Short Reads - Een dik jaar geleden schreven wij hier op het Stibbeblog over de eerste uitspraak van de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State over een milieuzone (Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak laat de Utrechtse milieuzone in stand). Wij voorspelden toen 388 verschillende milieuzones in Nederland. Ook de staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat erkende dat gevaar en schreef in een kamerbrief van 5 april 2018 over de harmonisering van milieuzones. Wij staan daar in dit blog kort bij stil.

Read more

18.04.2018 BE law
FAQ: vergt uw project of plan een passende beoordeling?

Articles - Arrest C‑323/17 van het Europees Hof van Justitie is relevant voor elke initiatiefnemer die zich afvraagt of een passende beoordeling nodig is. Met name antwoordt het Hof, in een Ierse zaak over windparkkabels en mosselen, negatief op de vraag of de voortoets, die aan de passende beoordeling voorafgaat, reeds mitigerende of beschermingsmaatregelen (meer bepaald: maatregelen ter voorkoming of beperking van de nadelige gevolgen van het voorgenomen project) mag bevatten. Deze post zet een stap achteruit en bespreekt het ruimere kader van het instrument van de passende beoordeling. 

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring