Articles

Consultation of the AFM's draft policy regulation on incidents

Consultation of the AFM's draft policy regulation on incidents

Consultation of the AFM's draft policy regulation on incidents

08.10.2015 NL law

On 30 July 2015, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets started a public consultation on its draft Policy rule on incidents (Beleidsregel incidenten). The consultation deals with how the concept of an 'incident' should be interpreted.

Dutch financial supervision law defines an 'incident' as a certain behaviour or an event which represents a serious risks to a financial institution's integrity or reputation. Incidents must be notified to the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financëele Markten, the "AFM").

In its draft policy rule, the AFM shares its view on the interpretation of this concept. The draft policy rule contains a non-exhaustive list of examples of incidents. Examples include:

  • becoming aware of a potential breach of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht);
  • a client has filed a complaint with the financial institution that one or more of its employees have displayed unethical behavior;
  • the Dutch Tax Authority (Belastingdienst) has imposed a fine on the undertaking;
  • a board member of the undertaking has entered into a private securities transaction without obtaining a required permission from the Compliance Officer under the company's insider trading policy; and
  • the undertaking has been held liable by a client for a considerable amount of money and such claim could impose serious danger for the undertaking.

The draft policy rule appears to adopt a broader interpretation of the concept of incidents than the Dutch legislator did when the current definition was enacted in 2007. At that time, the legislator took the position that an event only qualifies as an incident if a certain conduct forms a serious threat to the controlled and sound business operations of the financial undertaking, and expected a decrease in the number of notifiable incidents. The current proposal may in contrary thereto lead to an increase of notifiable incidents.

The policy rule is expected to enter into force once the consultation has been finalised.

Related news

25.04.2018 EU law
25 April 2018: Stibbe sponsors LPEA Insights conference in Luxembourg on 'Building the Real Economy'

Conference - LPEA, Luxembourg Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, organises a conference in Luxembourg, which brings on stage General Partners (GPs) and Limited Partners (LPs) to discuss and showcase the private equity sector from the perspective of local practitioners, together with additional contributions from guest speakers specially invited to the event. Stibbe Luxembourg is a proud sponsor of this event, which some of our lawyers will attend.  

Read more

11.04.2018 NL law
Court of Appeal: Deed of pledge does not cover all present receivables

Short Reads - 's-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal denies pledgee's claim that all present and future receivables of the pledgor were pledged to it by a deed of pledge dated 20 January 2014 and ruled that the receivables listed in the schedule attached to the deed of pledge were leading to establish on which receivables a right of pledge was created.

Read more

19.03.2018 EU law
The third-party effects of cross-border assignments of claims – Draft EU Regulation aiming to achieve legal certainty

Short Reads - On 12 March 2018, the European Commission (EC) published proposals on covered bonds, cross-border distribution of investment funds and cross-border transactions in claims and securities. The proposals are linked to the 2015 Action Plan on Capital Markets Union (CMU) and the European Commission's Mid-term Review that was published in June 2017.

Read more

10.04.2018 NL law
Inkoop van eigen aandelen door beursvennootschappen

Articles - Nu de financiële crisis aan zijn eind lijkt te zijn gekomen, en veel beursgenoteerde ondernemingen een goed gevulde kas hebben, lijkt de inkoop van eigen aandelen weer in zwang te raken. Onder strikte voorwaarden is de inkoop van eigen aandelen door een uitgevende instelling uitgezonderd van het in de Market Abuse Regulation geformuleerde marktmanipulatieverbod en het verbod op het gebruikmaken van voorwetenschap. In dit artikel bespreekt Roderik Vrolijk vanuit een praktisch perspectief deze uitzonderingen.  

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring