Articles

The ever more bumpy road towards lenient treatment

The ever more bumpy road towards lenient treatment

The ever more bumpy road towards lenient treatment

30.11.2015 NL law

There is no doubt that the introduction of amnesty or leniency programs in an increasing number of jurisdictions has been an important step in the fight against cartels. The majority of cartels that have been fined over the last 10 to 15 years have come to the attention of the relevant authorities via applications for lenient treatment.

Over the years, many companies confronted with the possible liability and very negative fall-out of being involved in a cartel (such as high fines and “jail time” for individuals), have chosen to confess and hand in evidence of illegal conduct to the authorities in exchange of lenient treatment. In particular for listed companies, an application for lenient treatment was “the right thing to do” in the context of damage control that could lead to no or reduced fines and jail time. In addition, cooperating with authorities and confessing illegal conduct was considered to be acting as a “good corporate citizen”.

This article has been published in Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015, 1, 14-15.

Read the full article.

Related news

05.06.2018 EU law
New EU rules to reduce marine pollution

Articles - Plastic pollution has become a key environmental concern. And it is not surprising why: according to a recent study, of the 8.3 billion metric tons of plastics that have been produced so far, 6.3 billion metric tons has become plastic waste. Of this plastic waste, 79% is accumulating either in landfill sites or in the oceans. Therefore, on 28 May 2018 the EU Commission issued a new draft Directive aimed at tackling marine litter by addressing single use plastic items and abandoned fishing gear.

Read more

01.06.2018 EU law
European Court of Justice rules EY did not violate stand-still obligation in Danish merger

Short Reads - On 31 May 2018, the European Court of Justice ruled that Ernst & Young (EY) did not illegally implement the acquisition of KPMG Denmark (KPMG DK) before obtaining antitrust clearance.  Following the announcement of the transaction, KPMG DK terminated a cooperation agreement. According to the Court, that act cannot be regarded as a violation of the stand-still obligation since it did not contribute to the change of control of the target undertaking.

Read more

01.06.2018 EU law
District Court of Amsterdam declines jurisdiction in competition law damages case

Short Reads - On 9 May 2018, the District Court of Amsterdam declined to accept jurisdiction over Athenian Brewery (AB), a Greek subsidiary of Heineken, in a civil case brought by competitor Macedonian Thrace Brewery (MTB). In the same judgment, the Amsterdam District Court did accept jurisdiction over the alleged claim brought by MTB against Heineken N.V. (Heineken), for the reason that Heineken is based in Amsterdam. The case against Heineken will therefore continue to the next procedural phase, in which the parties will debate the merits of MTB’s alleged claim against Heineken.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring