Articles

The ever more bumpy road towards lenient treatment

The ever more bumpy road towards lenient treatment

The ever more bumpy road towards lenient treatment

30.11.2015 NL law

There is no doubt that the introduction of amnesty or leniency programs in an increasing number of jurisdictions has been an important step in the fight against cartels. The majority of cartels that have been fined over the last 10 to 15 years have come to the attention of the relevant authorities via applications for lenient treatment.

Over the years, many companies confronted with the possible liability and very negative fall-out of being involved in a cartel (such as high fines and “jail time” for individuals), have chosen to confess and hand in evidence of illegal conduct to the authorities in exchange of lenient treatment. In particular for listed companies, an application for lenient treatment was “the right thing to do” in the context of damage control that could lead to no or reduced fines and jail time. In addition, cooperating with authorities and confessing illegal conduct was considered to be acting as a “good corporate citizen”.

This article has been published in Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015, 1, 14-15.

Read the full article.

Related news

02.07.2020 NL law
European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

Short Reads - The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Please share – ACM conditionally clears shared mobility platform merger

Short Reads - There may soon be a new competition tool available to tackle structural competition concerns in dynamic tech and platform markets. Until then, competition authorities resort to existing tools to deal with these markets. The Dutch competition authority (ACM) recently subjected the merger of two emerging platforms – without significant market footprint – to behavioural remedies. On 20 May 2020, the ACM cleared the merger between the travel apps of Dutch rail operator NS and transport company Pon.

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

Short Reads - Large online platforms may face more regulatory obligations, whilst non-dominant companies’ unilateral conduct may soon be curbed. The European Commission intends to tool up its kit by adding a new regulation to keep digital gatekeepers in check, as well as providing more clarity on how to define digital markets in its new Market Definition Notice.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
No proof of competitive disadvantage? No abusive favouritism

Short Reads - Companies claiming abuse of dominance in civil proceedings have their work cut out for them, as demonstrated by a ruling of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Real estate association VBO had accused dominant online platform Funda of favouritism. However, in line with the District Court’s earlier ruling, the Appeal Court dismissed the claim for insufficient evidence of negative effects on competition. The ruling confirms that the effect-based approach also applies in civil abuse claims, and that the standard of proof is high.    

Read more