Neodyum Miknatis
amateur porn
implant
olabahis
Casino Siteleri
Kayseri escort
canli poker siteleri kolaybet meritslot
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
Articles

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

Dutch Supreme Court: Termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if, given the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness

30.04.2015 NL law

The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam had correctly applied applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness, which provide that the termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to such standards, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand. 


In addition, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had not misapplied the standards of reasonableness and fairness by weighing the interests of the bank and the borrower against each other and had duly taken into account the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to the applicable general terms and conditions.

Dutch Supreme Court, 10 October 2014 (ECLI:NL:HR:2014:2929)

The bank was the lender under a credit agreement providing for an overdraft facility with an indefinite term and two fixed-rate loans with defined maturity dates. The applicable general terms and conditions included a provision for the automatic termination of the credit agreement and the loans becoming immediately due in the event of a payment default by the borrower. In 2009, the bank informed the borrower that it would terminate the credit agreement stating that the borrower had not complied with certain of its obligations. 

The Court of Appeal in Amsterdam ruled that the termination of the fixed-rate loans on the basis of the automatic termination provision was invalid. The Court of Appeal held that invocation by the bank of the automatic termination provision was contrary to applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness when taking into account the interests of the bank and the borrower, and given the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to its general terms and conditions. The Court of Appeal ruled that the bank had terminated the fixed-rate loans without taking due care of the justified interests of the borrower, and that the bank's own interest in terminating the fixed-rate loans was limited considering its comfortable credit and security position against the borrower. The bank filed an appeal with the Dutch Supreme Court.

The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had correctly applied the standards of reasonableness and fairness, which provide that the termination of a credit agreement may be invalid if the exercise of a termination right is unacceptable according to such standards, taking into account the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand. In addition, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal had not misapplied the standards of reasonableness and fairness by weighing the interests of the bank and the borrower against each other and taking into account the special duty of care owed by the bank pursuant to the applicable general terms and conditions. Accordingly, the Dutch Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam.

The ruling serves as a reminder that a termination provision included in a credit agreement may not be validly invoked by the lender if the invocation thereof, based on the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, conflicts with applicable standards of reasonableness and fairness. The judgment provides additional clarity on how those standards of reasonableness and fairness may be applied to the termination of a credit agreement and which facts and circumstances may be taken into account.

Related news

27.11.2020 NL law
E-book: 'Governance van beloningen in de financiële sector'

Articles - Sinds de publicatie van ons e-book ‘Beloningen in crisistijd’ op 22 april 2020 zijn er verschillende ontwikkelingen geweest in wet- en regelgeving rond beloningen in de financiële sector. Zo werd op 2 juli het Wetsvoorstel nadere beloningsmaatregelen financiële ondernemingen (Wnbf) ingediend. Daarnaast publiceerde de EBA op 18 juli het concept Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) over de criteria voor het selecteren van Identified Staff. Deze ontwikkelingen vormen de basis van een nieuw e-book over de governance van beloningen.

Read more

03.11.2020 BE law
Chambers and Partners Banking & Finance 2020 Global Practice Guide

Articles - The Chambers Banking & Finance 2020 Global Practice Guide covers 34 jurisdictions and discusses the impact of COVID-19, the high-yield market, restrictions on foreign lenders granting loans or security, foreign currency exchange, debt buy-back, withholding tax, guarantees and security, bankruptcy and insolvency, and EHS laws.

Read more