Articles

Belgium’s ratification to the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court and creation of a local division

Belgium’s ratification to the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court and creation of a local division

Belgium’s ratification to the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court and creation of a local division

10.07.2014 BE law

On 6 June 2014, Belgium deposited its instrument of ratification to the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court, joining Sweden, France, Denmark and Austria in the process of implementation of this Agreement.  

Also available in Dutch and French.

The ratification follows the approval by the Belgian Parliament on April 23, 2014 of a legislative proposal on the approbation of Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (here FR - NL) and the desire expressed by the council of Ministers held on 24 May and 24 October 2013 on the rapid implementation of this Agreement.

It was also decided to set up a local division of the Unified Patent Court in Belgium that will offer a procedure in four languages (French, Dutch, German and English), in order to, among others :

  • improve and assure the effectiveness of the Belgian practice of patent;
  • promote and ensure the attractiveness to maintain Belgium for innovative, international companies; and 
  • strengthen access to justice in their own language at an affordable price. 

However, the practical arrangements have yet to be elucidated.

As a reminder, this Agreement follows the adoption at EU level of a “package” of legislation for the implementation of the unitary patent, patent in force in the European Union (with the exception of Spain and Italy), which will be more accessible and less expensive than the “classical” European patent to which it will exist in addition. The agreement will enter into force on the first day of the fourth month following the deposit of the thirteenth instrument of ratification or accession, including the three Member States where the largest number of European patents have their effect in the year prior to the signing of this agreement (namely Germany, France and the United Kingdom) (Article 89 of the Convention).

 

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

Team

Related news

24.09.2020 BE law
Stibbe hosts a webinar on dawn raids organised by IBJ/IJE

Seminar - On 24 September 2020, several Stibbe lawyers ​​​​​explain the rights and obligations of companies when confronted with announced or unannounced raids. What do to when, for example, tax authorities, the competition authorities, police services or a bailiff are at your doorstep?

Read more

28.04.2020 EU law
Philippe Campolini co-authored a book dedicated to the protection of trade secrets in Belgium

Articles - The book, entitled 'Secrets d'Affaires' and published in the collection of the Dossiers du Journal des tribunaux, discusses the key concepts of the new protection regime, the lawful and unlawful acts defined in the EU Trade Secrets Directive (TSD) and the way they have been transposed in Belgian law, the implications of the new regime on contracts (especially employment contracts), and the protection of trade secrets in the context of administrative law.

Read more

28.04.2020 EU law
Origin of the primary ingredient - Implementing Regulation 2018/775

Short Reads - Since the beginning of this month, the origin of the primary ingredient of a food must be clearly indicated on the product when it differs from the origin given for the product as a whole. This is the result of the implementation of Article 26 (3) of the European Regulation 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers.  

Read more