Barber Boekraad

Barber’s expertise and practice covers a wide range of areas including contractual and tort disputes. She’s experienced in banking litigation as well as disputes relating to financial statements and auditor’s liability.

Furthermore, she manages our junior litigation practice and is a supervisor of junior associates.

Barber holds an Honours Masters of Law from the University of Amsterdam (2009). She also holds a Bachelor of Laws and a Bachelor of Political Science. Barber attended the Stibbe MBA Highlights Programme at INSEAD (2015).

In 2015, Barber was seconded to an international bank working as an in-house counsel restructuring and litigation.

Languages: Dutch, English
Admitted to the Amsterdam Bar: 2010

Related news

29.01.2019 NL law

How to remedy a default under Dutch law?

Short Reads - Under Dutch law, a debtor can remedy a default by offering to perform its obligations at a later date. Such an offer, however, has to include an offer to pay for damages and costs incurred as a result of the default (art. 6:86 DCC). If the creditor refuses to accept an offer that meets such criteria, the creditor will be in default.

Barber Boekraad Senior Associate Amsterdam

10.02.2015 NL law

Amsterdam Caterpillar initiative

Articles - New on our Stibbe website: a page devoted to our Caterpillar initiative. Our Amsterdam Caterpillar initiative provides strategic legal advice to start-ups and other up-and-coming companies under favourable and flexible conditions. The Caterpillar initiative was established by an enthusiastic group of young associates at our firm. Read more about the Caterpillar Initiative.

29.07.2017 NL law

Act against unreasonably long payment effective as of 1 july 2017

Short Reads - On 1 July 2017, the act against unreasonably long payment terms came into effect (the 'Act').

Barber Boekraad Senior Associate Amsterdam

08.10.2015 NL law

Correction for fairness applies in full in case of redress by insurers

Short Reads - On 10 July 2015, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that in cases of recourse (regres) by insurers, the correction for fairness (billijkheidscorrectie) applies in exactly the same way as it does for the insured party (Achmea/Menzis). Insurers can thus benefit from ‘subjective circumstances’ particular to the insured party. As a result of this judgment, the Dutch Supreme Court has put a stop to a long-lasting discussion amongst Dutch legal scholars on this issue.

Barber Boekraad Senior Associate Amsterdam