Short Reads

Stibbe lawyers call on legislator to put civil procedure reforms on hold

Stibbe lawyers call on legislator to put civil procedure reforms on h

Stibbe lawyers call on legislator to put civil procedure reforms on hold

11.02.2020 NL law

In a publication in the Dutch Lawyers’ Journal (Nederlands Juristenblad) we call on the Dutch legislator to put on hold a series of recently proposed bills that would reform Dutch Civil Procedure. We believe that priority should instead be given to speeding up the turnaround time of cases and the introduction of digital communication with the courts (currently submissions are still made on paper).

Increasing the speed and ‘innovation’ of civil proceedings?

The proposed bills are aimed at simplifying and speeding up civil proceedings, and to allowing for more ‘innovation’ in adjudicating cases. We are doubtful that the proposals as they currently stand will have such effects. In our article, we explain why the envisaged reforms may in fact be counterproductive.

Modernization and simplification of law of evidence

For instance, the proposed bill for the “modernization and simplification” of the law of evidence introduces a general duty for parties to disclose and submit any information that may be relevant to the case. Such an obligation would amount to extensive discovery, a concept currently foreign to Dutch Civil Procedure. Aside from the costs associated with such discovery, it will certainly not help to speed up civil proceedings.

Experiments Bill

A second proposal currently under consideration by the legislator is the Experiments Bill. This bill would allow courts to deviate from Dutch Civil Procedure by way of ‘temporary experiment’. The objective is to enable the courts to test and evaluate procedural modifications that could speed up, ‘innovate’ or simplify civil proceedings. However, the proposal seems to take for granted that the principles of due process will be safeguarded – even though the experiments envisaged under this bill could interfere with the very core of these principles. In our opinion, such fundamental changes require further consideration, and should not be left to occasional experiments. We also question whether such experiments will in fact achieve the desired result of swifter and simpler adjudication of disputes.

Advice to the Dutch Minister of Justice

In conclusion, we advise the Minister of Justice to put these intended reforms on hold and focus on the organizational aspects of the civil litigation. Due to continuous budget cuts, the courts are currently understaffed and the system is backed up. If the government is serious about reducing turnaround times and allowing courts to implement made-to-measure case management procedures, it should increase the budget for the judiciary on a structural basis.

Related news

13.09.2022 NL law
Aard en uitleg van statuten

Short Reads - Al lange tijd is het een gemeenplaats in de rechtspraak en de literatuur dat statuten zo niet steeds, dan ten minste in beginsel naar objectieve maatstaven uitgelegd moeten worden. Ter ondersteuning van deze opvatting wordt aangevoerd dat de bijzondere aard van de statuten in beginsel tot een objectieve uitleg dwingt.

Read more

16.09.2022 NL law
Webinar Verschoningsrecht

Articles - Tim de Greve gaat samen met Prof. Petra van Kampen in op actuele ontwikkelingen in het verschoningsrecht tijdens het webinar Verschoningsrecht van de Academie voor de Rechtspraktijk. Dit webinar is hier terug te kijken.

Read more

21.07.2022 NL law
Dutch Supreme Court decides against the pledgeability of non-transferable claims

Articles - Lawyers occasionally wonder how the law ended up as it is. We had that experience after the Dutch Supreme Court’s decision of 1 July 2022 (Rabobank/Ten Berge q.q.; ECLI:NL:HR:2022:984), regarding the possibility or impossibility of pledging a claim. The Supreme Court decided that claims that have been made non-transferable under property law in a contractual agreement between a creditor and a debtor, cannot be pledged either.

Read more