Short Reads

Position paper on European supervisory mechanism for AML

Position paper on European supervisory mechanism for AML

Position paper on European supervisory mechanism for AML

15.11.2019 NL law

On 8 November 2019, the Dutch Minister of Finance sent a joint position paper to the Dutch Parliament regarding the need for a European AML supervisor (Anti-money laundering). The paper was prepared by the Ministers of Finance of Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Latvia and the Netherlands. A short summary of the paper is set out below. For more information on the broader plans of the Dutch government to combat money laundering, we refer to our previous newsletters of 1 July 2019 and 17 October 2019.

The six EU Member States write that money-laundering scandals throughout the EU have affected the integrity and reputation of the European financial sector. In addition to harmonised regulations, there is a need for a harmonised supervision, for the following reasons:

  1. shortcomings in one Member State can affect another;
  2. international cooperation and exchange of information between supervisors is often complex;
  3. information exchange between AML supervisors and prudential supervisors is unnecessarily complicated;
  4. resources are often limited; and
  5. other interests (e.g., supervised institutions or interest groups) may influence investigations or enforcement.

This type of EU joint supervision should, according to the six Member States, cover all financial institutions that fall under the scope of the Regulation governing the formation of the European supervisory authorities (e.g., banks, investment firms, insurance companies, pension funds) and the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Directive.

The six Member States continue to state that the EU central supervisor should mainly be focused on high-risk financial institutions or situations where national supervision has apparently been insufficient or inappropriate. The central European supervisor should also have the power to direct specific instructions to national authorities in respect of individual institutions, and ultimately, to bring such individual institutions under its direct supervision.

The plans set out in this paper have not yet resulted in proposals from the European Commission, Council or the European Parliament for new EU legislation. It is uncertain whether this will be the case. In any case, it seems that there is growing support for this idea within the EU.

Related news

09.12.2019 NL law
Consultation to amend Dutch AML laws

Short Reads - On 2 December 2019, the Dutch Minister of Finance and Minister of Justice and Security published a consultation containing plans to amend Dutch AML laws and regulations. A short summary of these plans is set out below. For more information on the broader plans of the Dutch government to combat money laundering, we refer to our previous newsletters of 1 July 2019, 17 October 2019 and 15 November 2019.

Read more

13.11.2019 NL law
A new Act on the Supervision of Trust Offices

Articles - Roderik Vrolijk and Soeradj Ramsanjhal published an article in the Dutch Financial Law Review as a follow-up on their article two years ago in the same journal. The authors specifically shed light on the customer due diligence and open norms of the new Act on the Supervision of Trust Offices 2018, that entered into force on 1 January 2019. 

Read more

08.11.2019 BE law
Interview with Wouter Ghijsels on Next Gen lawyers

Articles - Stibbe’s managing partner Wouter Ghijsels shares his insights on the next generation of lawyers and the future of the legal profession at the occasion of the Leaders Meeting Paris where Belgian business leaders, politicians and inspiring people from the cultural and academic world will discuss this year's central theme "The Next Gen".

Read more

27.11.2019 NL law
Inspectie SZW: Stilleggen Zonder Waarborgen?

Articles - In dit artikel bespreken Monique van der Linden en Erik Witjens de toepassing van de bevoegdheid tot stillegging van werk ex artikel 28 Arbowet kritisch. In de praktijk is een tendens zichtbaar waarbij inspecteurs na een vermeende overtreding of een arbeidsongeval direct hard ingrijpen door gebruik te maken van deze bevoegdheid. 

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring