Seminar

Challenges and solutions in the software market

Obstacles and solutions to strangulation contracts in the software ma

Challenges and solutions in the software market

29.11.2019 NL law

Stibbe is organising a seminar in Amsterdam on 29 November 2019 concerning recent developments in the software market, potential new opportunities offering the right to respond to powerful suppliers, and the question of how these developing resources can be used effectively. 

Challenges and solutions in the software market

The IT market is rumbling. Dutch CIOs recently sounded the alarm in the Financieele Dagblad about strangulation contracts, aggressive audit practices and huge claims for supplementary payments from large software suppliers. A counter-argument is that CIOs are not naïve. Is there a market failure or immaturity on the demand side? Is this discussion still relevant in the transformation to the cloud? What can the CIO do and what (new) resources can they use against powerful suppliers? When does it make sense to litigate? During the seminar, attendees will be given insights and tips from various jurisdictions, as well as a glimpse into an ongoing lawsuit in the US.

Team

Related news

20.04.2021 NL law
Exoneration clauses in commercial contracts: excluding indirect damage

Short Reads - In Dutch legal practice, contracting parties often agree on exoneration clauses in commercial contracts in which liability for indirect damage is excluded. However, the term indirect damage does not exist in the Dutch Civil Code, and in the Dutch language there is no generally accepted meaning for indirect damage. Conflicts therefore quite frequently arise between contracting parties in relation to the interpretation of indirect damage.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Slovak Telekom: ECJ on essentials of the ‘essential facilities’ doctrine

Short Reads - Only dominant companies with a “genuinely tight grip” on the market can be forced to grant rivals access to their infrastructure. According to the ECJ’s rulings in Slovak Telekom and Deutsche Telekom, it is only in this scenario that the question of indispensability of the access for rivals comes into play. In the assessment of practices other than access refusal, indispensability may be indicative of a potential abuse of a dominant position, but is not a required condition.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Pay-for-delay saga ends with nothing new; but pharma quest continues

Short Reads - On 25 March 2021, the ECJ ended the Lundbeck pay-for-delay saga by dismissing the appeals from Lundbeck and five generic manufacturers against a European Commission ‘pay-for-delay’ decision. Following its recent Paroxetine judgment, the ECJ found that Lundbeck’s process patents did not preclude generic companies being viewed as potential competitors, particularly since the patents did not represent an insurmountable barrier to entry. In addition, the patent settlement agreements constituted infringements "by object".

Read more