Seminar

Stibbe Annual Competition Law Update

Stibbe Annual Competition Law Update

Stibbe Annual Competition Law Update

17.01.2019 EU law

The Stibbe Annual Competition Law Update will take place on 17 January 2019 (14.30 - 17.45 hours) at our offices in Amsterdam.

In addition to the regular updates on the main developments in EU and Dutch competition law and competition litigation over 2018, this year's event features a special programme to prepare you for 2019 including a guide to help you navigate through the maze of vertical competition issues in the online and offline world. Next year is set to be dynamic in the area of antitrust for online and offline distribution models: the Block Exemption Regulation on vertical restraints will come under review, the Geo-blocking Regulation is now applicable and more enforcement action on sales restrictions and digital conduct is likely. This event is an ideal opportunity to hear a practitioner’s perspective on these issues so you are prepared for the year ahead.          

Stibbe Annual Competition Law Update

Programme

14.30 - 15.00          Registration
15.00 - 15.45          Update on Developments in EU and Dutch Competition Law - Floris ten Have
15.45 - 16.30          Update on Developments in Civil Litigation and Competition - Jeroen Kortmann
16.30 - 16.45          Break
16.45 - 17.45          A Guide through the Maze of Vertical Competition Issues in the Online and Offline World - Rein Wesseling
17.45 - 19.00          Drinks


For more information or to register, please contact us via StibbeEvents@stibbe.com.

Practical information:

Date: 17 January 2019 (14.30 - 17.45 hours) 

Location: Beethovenplein 10, 1077 WM Amsterdam

Team

Related news

08.01.2019 EU law
Belgium's Energy & Climate Plan - What is the legislative framework for climate policy in Belgium?

Articles - On 19 December 2018, Belgium adopted the first version of the National Energy & Climate Plan, which is a compilation of three individual climate plans from each of Belgium’s regions. It contains specific measures aiming to reduce CO2 emissions in Belgium by 35% by 2030 and to increase the share of renewable energy to 18.3%. The Plan will be submitted to the European Commission and, at the same time, presented to the population, stakeholders, parliaments, and neighboring countries.

Read more

04.01.2019 NL law
Partial fine reduction for Deutsche Telekom and Slovak Telekom for abuse of dominance

Short Reads - The General Court recently clarified that to establish a margin squeeze in the case of positive margins, the Commission needs to prove the exclusionary effects of the dominant company's pricing practices. It also indicated that in cases of refusal to grant access, it is not always necessary to establish the indispensability of the access.

Read more

04.01.2019 NL law
Walking the tightrope between data protection and EU investigations

Short Reads - Two recent publications confirm that it is possible for companies to cooperate with a European Commission investigation and still comply with the data protection rules. It is also possible for the Commission to deviate from certain data protection obligations in the interest of a competition law investigation. The tightrope between data protection and Commission investigations may not be as rigid as initially feared.

Read more

04.01.2019 NL law
General Court dismisses Canal+ appeal against pay-TV commitment decision

Short Reads - The General Court recently dismissed the appeal brought by Canal+ against the decision of the European Commission making the commitments of Paramount legally binding. In 2015, the Commission sent a Statement of Objections alleging that certain geo-blocking clauses in licensing agreements between film studios and pay-TV broadcasters had the object of restricting cross-border competition.

Read more

04.01.2019 NL law
Guess what, online branding restrictions are on the Commission's radar

Short Reads - Companies are probably aware of the Commission's eagerness to clamp down on online resale price maintenance and geo-blocking restrictions. The recent fine for vertical restraints by clothing company Guess marks a new dot on the Commission's radar. Restrictions on retailers using a supplier's brand names for online search advertising purposes are just as much a no-go.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring