Short Reads

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new procedural rules

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new procedural rules

05.08.2019 NL law

On 1 October 2019, legislation will enter into force ending the KEI pilot scheme for digital litigation at the courts of Gelderland and Central Netherlands (Midden-Nederland). However, certain new procedural rules, which were part of the digitalisation pilot, will remain in force and will apply to all Dutch courts.

End of digital litigation

The pilot for digital litigation started on 1 September 2017 for claims with mandatory legal representation at the courts of Gelderland and Central Netherlands; see our previous blogs 'KEI: Digitalization of the justice system', 'The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation' and 'Implementation of KEI legislation for Civil 1.0 procedures'. The pilot was originally supposed to be integrated in several phases, and digital litigation was planned to be integrated in all Dutch courts in 2019. This was cancelled, however, after the development of the digital system had been aborted due to budget overruns and uncertainty about whether it would result in a well-functioning system. The operation of the pilot scheme had led to differences in litigation and procedural rules at the courts of Gelderland and central Netherlands on one hand, and the rest of the Dutch courts on the other, since 1 September 2017.

The need to align the procedural rules for all Dutch courts as soon as possible has resulted in this new legislation, which puts an end to the pilot and provides for the same procedural rules for all Dutch courts.

The digital litigation for claims in cassation, in force since 1 March 2017, will remain unchanged.

Reset of digitalisation

The Council of the Judiciary has now adopted a  basic plan for civil law and administrative law to shape digitalisation in a different way (dubbed the "reset" of digitalisation) as a first step towards future legislation on digital litigation. This will require the same uniform procedural law to apply to all courts. Therefore, adjustments are needed to the procedural regulations. These are currently being worked on.

Introducing new procedural rules

The new legislation does not only withdraw the digitalisation pilot, but also introduces new procedural rules that aim to provide the judge with more control during the case and introduce more flexibility and options during an oral hearing. These rules already applied to the two district courts that were involved in the pilot, but as of 1 October 2019 they will apply to all Dutch district courts and courts of appeal. The new rules include the following:

  • The judge can order an oral hearing during any stage of the proceedings. The parties will always have the opportunity to further clarify their arguments during an oral hearing. Therefore the right for a plea (pleidooi) being a separate procedural action comes to an end;
  • During an oral hearing, the judge can discuss the course of the proceedings with the parties, and can order the parties to conduct additional procedural actions. This way judges will have more control, allowing for more customisation during a case.
  • Making a recording of a hearing, whether a visual or sound recording, will become possible.

It is not yet clear when other parts of previous - as yet unimplemented - KEI legislation will be introduced, such as the merger of summons and applications proceedings into one type of proceeding (procesinleiding), and the intended tighter deadlines for procedural steps.

Team

Related news

17.09.2021 NL law
Illusies van een dashboardsamenleving

Articles - Steven Hijink plaatst in zijn column in Ondernemingsrecht kritische kanttekeningen bij enkele aspecten van het voorontwerp voor de Wet toekomst accountancysector, dat op 9 juli 2021 is gepubliceerd.

Read more

03.09.2021 NL law
Don’t get scammed, and don’t let scammers scam: the legal framework for mistaken payments clarified

Short Reads - “Bol.com mistakes scammers for Brabantia and pays €750,000’’ read headlines in The Netherlands in May 2021. After receiving an e-mail written in flawed Dutch (with some English in between), Bol.com paid €750,493.09 to what it thought was a new bank account in Spain of an existing Dutch/Belgian supplier, Brabantia. The court ruled that Bol.com could not rely on the fact that the company had already paid the scammer pretending to be Brabantia and that Bol.com was therefore not discharged by payment (ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2021:1528).

Read more

26.08.2021 BE law
Sarah De Wulf and Malik Baba co-authored a book dedicated to the legal aspects of the video-game industry

Articles - The book, entitled 'Legal Aspects of the video-game industry', provides a first answer to the most important legal questions that might arise in the lifecycle of a video-game company. These insights are intended to be applicable irrespective of jurisdictions, illustrated by real-life situations and easy to read for individuals without a legal background.

Read more

05.08.2021 NL law
Unauthorized representation: liability of the intermediary

Short Reads - This blog is one of the blogs in a series called “Commercial contracts in the Netherlands”. It is discussed as to under which circumstances third parties can hold the intermediary liable for damage suffered due to unauthorized representation, alongside discussion of the various legal bases for liability.

Read more