Articles

Enable “likes” and bear joint-controllership

Enable “likes” and bear joint-controllership

Enable “likes” and bear joint-controllership

19.08.2019 EU law

The Court of Justice of the European Union recently ruled, in Case C-40/14 Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV,  that a website operator that features “Like” social-media plugin from Facebook likely qualifies as joint-controller with Facebook for its website visitors’ personal data collection and transmission to Facebook.

The Court of Justice of the European Union recently ruled, in Case C-40/14 Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV, that a website operator that features “Like" social-media plugin from Facebook likely qualifies as joint-controller with Facebook for its website visitors' personal data collection and transmission to Facebook.

The CJEU recalled that in order to qualify as “data controller", it is sufficient for a natural or legal person to exert influence over the processing of personal data for its own purposes even though such involvement only relates to one part of the processing. Different operators can thus be involved to different degrees, and their respective liabilities will then have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

The Advocate General stated in its opinion that an entity can qualify as controller only in relation to the operations of personal data processing for which it jointly determines the purposes and means, but not for any other parts of the overall chain of processing.

In this case, the CJEU stated that Fashion ID “appears to have made it possible for Facebook to obtain personal data of visitors to its website" as soon as that visitor accesses the website and irrespective of whether he or she is a Facebook user or whether he or she has even clicked the “Like" button. Hence, the CJEU concluded that in relation to this collection and transmission of the visitors' personal data to Facebook, both Facebook and Fashion ID qualify as joint-controllers because they determine together the means and origin of the processing operations. Indeed, by adding on this “Like" button to its website, Fashion ID optimises the exposure of its goods by increasing their visibility on Facebook.

All these conclusions are still formulated in a relatively hypothetical form by the CJEU since it is now up to the national referring Court to conduct the necessary investigations and render a final decision on the merits.

Related news

20.09.2022 EU law
Launch of Metaverse blog series

Articles - Stibbe launches a new blog series focusing on the legal challenges of the Metaverse. In our upcoming blog posts, we will discuss the legal challenges of NFTs, crypto-assets, Metaverse platforms, crypto exchanges, DAO, and many more.

Read more

28.07.2022 NL law
Zuiver commercieel belang ook gerechtvaardigd belang: Raad van State laat zich er niet over uit

Short Reads - Op 27 juli 2022 heeft de Raad van State bevestigd dat de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens onterecht een boete van € 575.000 aan VoetbalTV heeft opgelegd. De hoop bestond dat de Afdeling antwoord zou geven op de vraag of de AP terecht of onterecht meent dat een zuiver commercieel belang géén gerechtvaardigd belang kan zijn in de zin van de Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming. Het antwoord op deze vraag blijft echter uit.  

Read more

28.07.2022 NL law
Purely commercial interest also a legitimate interest? Council of State leaves the question unanswered.

Short Reads - On 27 July 2022, the Council of State confirmed that the Dutch Data Protection Authority wrongly imposed a €575,000 fine on VoetbalTV. But the Council did not answer the question whether the AP rightly or wrongly believes that a purely commercial interest cannot be a legitimate interest within the meaning of the General Data Protection Regulation.

Read more