Short Reads

Consultation on additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector

Consultation on additional remuneration restrictions within the finan

Consultation on additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector

05.09.2018 NL law

A team from Stibbe has participated in the public consultation launched by the Minister of Finance on additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector. In their response (in Dutch), the Stibbe team pointed out that there are several legal objections to the proposed measures. Furthermore, the team has raised questions regarding the necessity and legal justification for introducing these additional measures.

On 17 July 2018, the Dutch Minister of Finance published a consultation document regarding potential additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector. The purpose of these restrictions is to help to restore trust within the financial sector.

As part of the consultation, market participants were invited to provide input on the following three statutory obligations regarding fixed remuneration:

  1. Extension clawback:  partial clawback of fixed pay (above a certain minimum) of the management of a bank or insurer will apply if state aid (staatssteun) is received.

    The purpose of this requirement is to hold the managers more personally accountable when the tax payer has to bail out a failing bank or insurer.
     
  2. Retention period:  management and employees will be obliged to retain shares or components of their fixed pay, the value of which depends on the market value of the firm, for a certain period.

    The purpose of this requirement is to align the interests of the management and the employees with the long-term interests of the firm.
     
  3. Social function:  the remuneration policy of a financial firm must prescribe how the remuneration of management and employees relates to the social function of the firm. In addition, firms must hold themselves publicly accountable for their decision.

    The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that firms, take their social function into account when making remuneration proposals and explain themselves afterwards.

Team

Related news

07.12.2018 BE law
Virtual Currency Regulation Law Review

Articles - The first edition of the Virtual Currency Regulation Law Review is intended to provide a practical, business-focused analysis of recent legal and regulatory changes and developments, and of their effects, and to look forward at expected trends in the area of virtual currencies on a country-by-country basis.

Read more

04.12.2018 NL law
Stibbe nomme deux nouveaux associés et trois counsels

Inside Stibbe - Stibbe a nommé Floris ten Have (droit de la concurrence, Amsterdam) et Julien Bogaerts (droit des sociétés et droit financier, Bruxelles) en tant qu’associés. Johan Zwemmer (droit du travail, Amsterdam), Li Wee Toh (droit de l’énergie et industrie, Amsterdam) et Giovanni Smet (droit fiscal, Bruxelles) deviennent, quant à eux, counsels. Ces nouvelles nominations prendront effet le 1er janvier 2019.

Read more

04.12.2018 NL law
Stibbe appoints two new partners and three counsel

Inside Stibbe - Stibbe has promoted Floris ten Have (EU law, competition and regulation, Amsterdam) and Julien Bogaerts (corporate and finance, Brussels) to partner. In addition, Johan Zwemmer (employment law, Amsterdam), Li Wee Toh (energy and industry, Amsterdam) and Giovanni Smet (tax, Brussels) have been promoted to counsel. The new appointments will take effect on 1 January 2019.

Read more

04.12.2018 NL law
Stibbe benoemt twee nieuwe partners en drie counsels

Inside Stibbe - Stibbe benoemt Floris ten Have (mededingingsrecht, Amsterdam) en Julien Bogaerts (corporate en finance, Brussel) tot partner. Johan Zwemmer (arbeidsrecht, Amsterdam), Li Wee Toh (energierecht en industrie, Amsterdam) en Giovanni Smet (fiscaal recht, Brussel) zijn benoemd tot counsel. De nieuwe benoemingen gaan in vanaf 1 januari 2019.

Read more

08.11.2018 NL law
Valse of voorgewende redenen: grond voor een billijke vergoeding?

Articles - De werkgever zegt de arbeidsovereenkomst op na daarvoor toestemming te hebben gekregen van het UWV. De werkneemster klaagt – onder andere – dat in feite sprake was van een verstoorde arbeidsverhouding. De werkgever had volgens de werkneemster dus eigenlijk een ontbindingsverzoek wegens een verstoorde arbeidsverhouding moeten indienen. Daarom verzocht de werkneemster de kantonrechter een billijke vergoeding toe te kennen.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring