Short Reads

Consultation on additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector

Consultation on additional remuneration restrictions within the finan

Consultation on additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector

05.09.2018 NL law

A team from Stibbe has participated in the public consultation launched by the Minister of Finance on additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector. In their response (in Dutch), the Stibbe team pointed out that there are several legal objections to the proposed measures. Furthermore, the team has raised questions regarding the necessity and legal justification for introducing these additional measures.

On 17 July 2018, the Dutch Minister of Finance published a consultation document regarding potential additional remuneration restrictions within the financial sector. The purpose of these restrictions is to help to restore trust within the financial sector.

As part of the consultation, market participants were invited to provide input on the following three statutory obligations regarding fixed remuneration:

  1. Extension clawback:  partial clawback of fixed pay (above a certain minimum) of the management of a bank or insurer will apply if state aid (staatssteun) is received.

    The purpose of this requirement is to hold the managers more personally accountable when the tax payer has to bail out a failing bank or insurer.
     
  2. Retention period:  management and employees will be obliged to retain shares or components of their fixed pay, the value of which depends on the market value of the firm, for a certain period.

    The purpose of this requirement is to align the interests of the management and the employees with the long-term interests of the firm.
     
  3. Social function:  the remuneration policy of a financial firm must prescribe how the remuneration of management and employees relates to the social function of the firm. In addition, firms must hold themselves publicly accountable for their decision.

    The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that firms, take their social function into account when making remuneration proposals and explain themselves afterwards.

Team

Related news

21.07.2022 NL law
Dutch Supreme Court decides against the pledgeability of non-transferable claims

Articles - Lawyers occasionally wonder how the law ended up as it is. We had that experience after the Dutch Supreme Court’s decision of 1 July 2022 (Rabobank/Ten Berge q.q.; ECLI:NL:HR:2022:984), regarding the possibility or impossibility of pledging a claim. The Supreme Court decided that claims that have been made non-transferable under property law in a contractual agreement between a creditor and a debtor, cannot be pledged either.

Read more

27.07.2022 NL law
Registratie UBO's in het UBO-register: terugmelding, handhaving en sanctionering

Short Reads - Vennootschappen en andere juridische entiteiten hadden tot 27 maart 2022 voor de registratie van hun UBO’s (ultimate beneficial owners) bij het Nederlandse UBO-register. Het voldoen aan de UBO-registratie blijft actueel. Het overtreden van bepalingen betreffende de UBO-registratie kan terugmeldingen, handhaving en sanctionering tot gevolg hebben.

Read more

26.07.2022 NL law
Verplichte cao en pensioen: niet perse voor alle werkgevers in de groep

Short Reads - Als één groepsvennootschap verplicht onder een cao of bedrijfstakpensioenregeling valt, geldt dit dan ook voor andere vennootschappen/werkgevers in de groep? Hoe werkt dit indien de ondernemingsactiviteiten (bijv. verkoop, logistiek, vervoer) verdeeld zijn over verschillende BV’s, maar elkaar wel aanvullen? Recente rechtspraak over reisbemiddelaar Prijsvrij.nl en (eerder) online supermarkt Picnic biedt meer duidelijkheid.

Read more