Short Reads

Countdown 9 weeks until GDPR : Will all companies be required to appoint a data protection officer?

Stibbe - Will all companies be required to appoint a DPO?

Countdown 9 weeks until GDPR : Will all companies be required to appoint a data protection officer?

22.03.2018 EU law

Only 9 more weeks to go before the GDPR becomes fully effective. Preparing your company for the application of this new regulation requires a correct understanding of its principles. Each week, we highlight one particular misconception regarding the interpretation of the GDPR.

Will all companies be required to appoint a data protection officer?

It is a common misunderstanding that all companies will be required by the GDPR to appoint a Data Protection Officer (“DPO”).

The designation of a DPO is only mandatory and thus only truly required for entities that act as a data controller or data processor in the three specific cases which have been described: (i) if the processing is carried out by a public authority or body, except for courts acting in their judicial capacity; (ii) if the core activities (i.e., the primary activities or key operations that are necessary for achieving the goals of the controller or processor) consist of processing operations that require regular and systematic large-scale monitoring of data subjects, e.g., businesses that engage in profiling or tracking of online behaviour; or (iii) if the core activities consist of processing on a large scale the so-called “sensitive” categories of personal data, such as health data, biometric data, data revealing ethnic origin or religious beliefs, and information relating to criminal convictions. Additionally, Member State law may require the mandatory appointment of a DPO in other situations as well, as is already the case for Germany for example.

In other cases than those referred to above, the voluntary appointment of a DPO is merely recommended, thus not mandatory. Moreover, if an organization designates a DPO voluntarily, the requirements under the GDPR will fully apply to his or her designation, position, and tasks as if the designation were mandatory. This needs to be considered when deciding to appoint a DPO voluntarily.

 

Stibbe, together with Chiomenti, Cuatrecasas, GIDE and Gleiss Lutz, have gathered this useful information, reflecting some common misconceptions about the implementation of the GDPR.

Team

Related news

04.03.2021 BE law
Webinar: Responding to Personal Data Breaches in the Post-GDPR era

Seminar - On 24-26 March 2021 ERA (Adademy of European Law) organises an online Conference "Responding to Personal Data Breaches in the Post-GDPR era". Erik Valgaeren, our Brussels TMT partner, addresses the topic "Managing personal data breach in a complex international scenario", including cross border cases in the EU and breaches at non-EU establishments.

Read more

18.05.2021 NL law
Kroniek: De bestuursrechtelijke aspecten van de AVG

Articles - Tom Barkhuysen, Steven Bastiaans, Fenneke Buskermolen en Fatma Çapkurt (Universiteit Leiden) schreven samen de eerste editie van de nieuwe jaarlijkse NTB kroniek: de bestuursrechtelijke aspecten van de AVG. Hierin bespreken zij onder meer de meest relevante (bestuursrechtelijke) jurisprudentie van het afgelopen jaar op het gebied van de AVG.

Read more

04.05.2021 NL law
Participatie en privacyregels: hoe te combineren onder de Omgevingswet?

Short Reads - In het stelsel van de Omgevingswet (Ow) is een belangrijke rol bedacht voor participatie bij de totstandkoming van besluiten. Het beoogde resultaat: tijdig belangen, meningen en creativiteit op tafel krijgen en daarmee een groter draagvlak en kwalitatief betere besluitvorming bereiken. Door een grotere betrokkenheid van meer personen gaan overheden en initiatiefnemers ook meer persoonsgegevens verwerken. Dit brengt privacyrisico’s met zich mee. Wat regelt de Ow op het gebied van privacy, de verwerking van persoonsgegevens en datagebruik?

Read more