Short Reads

Ongoing commercial transactions entered into before 1 July 2017 now subject to new 60 day payment term limit

Ongoing commercial transactions entered into before 1 July 2017 now s

Ongoing commercial transactions entered into before 1 July 2017 now subject to new 60 day payment term limit

11.07.2018

Sixteen years ago, a provision on statutory interest in commercial agreements was introduced in article 6:119a Dutch Civil Code (DCC) to first implement Directive 2000/35/EC and subsequently Directive 2011/7/EU.

1.      Background: Statutory commercial interest

Sixteen years ago, a provision on statutory interest in commercial agreements was introduced in article 6:119a Dutch Civil Code (DCC) to first implement Directive 2000/35/EC and subsequently Directive 2011/7/EU.

These Directives were introduced to ensure compliance and prevent payment delays in commercial transactions. If a party to a commercial transaction exceeds a payment term, it can be held liable for statutory commercial interest. In accordance with Directive 2011/7/EU, article 6:119a DCC limits the payment term in commercial transactions to a maximum of 60 days, unless the parties explicitly agreed a longer term that could not be considered 'grossly unfair'.

This criterion did not offer small companies (SMEs) protection from long payment terms though. Instead, large companies tended to use their negotiating power to convince SMEs to agree to longer payment terms. This was considered undesirable because long payment terms may cause liquidity problems and sometimes even bankruptcy.

2.      Legislation against unreasonably long payment terms

In light of the undesirable effects outlined above, new legislation against unreasonably long payment terms was introduced. As a result, the vague criterion of 'grossly unfair' in paragraph 5 in article 6:119a  DCC has been replaced by paragraph 5, which contains an absolute criterion for a particular group of commercial transactions (see our previous blog "Act against unreasonably long payment effective as of 1 July 2017").

For a particular group of commercial transactions, instead of the vague criterion of 'grossly unfair' in article 6:119a paragraph 6 DCC, the Act introduces an absolute criterion.

A large company that enters into a commercial transaction with an SME and acts as a creditor is not entitled to stipulate a payment term that exceeds 60 days. In addition, any payment term imposed by a large company that exceeds 60 days will be considered void. In such circumstances, the statutory term in article 6:119a paragraph 2 DCC will apply as follows:

  1. the large company is automatically obliged to pay within 30 days; and
  2. if the large company does not pay within this 30 days term, the SME can claim statutory commercial interest. This interest will start to accrue after these 30 days have elapsed.

This legislative change was implemented on 1 July 2017. All commercial transactions concluded on or after that date had to comply with the new rule and could therefore no longer include a payment term exceeding 60 days.

3.      Transitional arrangement ended 1 July 2018

The new legislation includes a transitional arrangement for commercial transactions already in place on 1 July 2017, such as continuing performance contracts [duurovereenkomsten]. These commercial transactions are subject to the new 60 day limit from 1 July 2018 onwards.

Large companies with commercial transactions already in place on 1 July 2017 that include payment terms exceeding 60 days should therefore be aware that these payment terms are void as of 1 July 2018. By operation of law, a payment term of 30 days will apply instead.

4.      Qualification as commercial transaction

If a contract qualifies as a commercial transaction, there are other factors to consider besides the duration of the payment term. For example, the difference between statutory commercial interest at 8% and regular statutory interest at 2% will also have a significant impact.

Consequently, there are more and more cases in which the debtor disputes the qualification of a contract as a commercial transaction. For instance, an appeal has recently been lodged at the Supreme Court on whether a loan agreement qualifies as commercial transaction.

In his conclusion of 18 May 2018 ECLI:NL:PHR:2018:513, which precedes the decision of the Supreme Court, the Advocate General Hartlief agreed with the Court of Appeal that a loan agreement qualified as a commercial transaction and therefore commercial interest applied to overdue interest payments. The Supreme Court is expected to render its decision soon.

Team

Related news

14.02.2020 EU law
Does your everyday cleaning product qualify as a 'biocidal product' under European legislation?

Articles - On 19 December 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on the concept of 'biocidal product', as defined in article 3 of Regulation 528/2012 on the making available on the market and use of biocidal products, in a case on a cleaning product primarily used "to ensure the absence of mould". According to the CJEU, the concept of ‘biocidal product’ is to be interpreted broadly, hereby also broadening the scope of application of Regulation 528/2012.

Read more

12.02.2020 NL law
Van inspraakverordening naar participatieverordening op decentraal niveau

Short Reads - De regering stelt voor om de reikwijdte van de decentrale inspraakverordeningen te vergroten naar de uitvoering en evaluatie van decentraal beleid. Dat staat in een conceptwetsvoorstel dat op 9 december 2019 ter internetconsultatie is voorgelegd. Het conceptwetsvoorstel beoogt een wijziging van onder meer de Gemeentewet, de Provinciewet en de Waterschapswet.

Read more

12.02.2020 NL law
Het oproepen en horen van getuigen in het bestuursrecht: hoe zit het ook al weer?

Short Reads - Het oproepen van getuigen en het horen daarvan ter zitting door de bestuursrechter heeft de Hoge Raad in zijn arrest van 15 november 2019 overzichtelijk in kaart gebracht. Dat arrest, dat door de belastingkamer in een bestuurlijke boetezaak is gewezen, is ook voor andere terreinen van het bestuursrecht van belang. Mede ook omdat het horen van getuigen buiten het fiscale bestuursrecht nog in de kinderschoenen staat. In dit bericht bespreken we daarom de mogelijkheden die er bestaan om getuigen te (laten) oproepen en hoe de bestuursrechter daarmee moet omgaan.

Read more

12.02.2020 EU law
Dutch court rules that investors suffer investment loss in the market where securities are listed and traded

Short Reads - On 29 January 2020, the Rotterdam District Court ruled on the question of which laws are applicable to the tort claims brought by (former) Petrobras investors against Petrobras (ECLI:NL:RBROT:2020:614). The Court applied the main rule of EU Regulation Rome II (the “Rome II Regulation”), which stipulates that the law applicable to claims in tort is the law of the country in which the harm suffered by the victim as a result of the tort occurs.

Read more

12.02.2020 NL law
Omgevingsrecht en mobiliteit: hoe werkt het afwijken van parkeernormen in bestemmingsplannen?

Short Reads - Op grond van artikel 3.1.2, tweede lid, Bro kan een bestemmingsplan ten behoeve van een goede ruimtelijke ordening regels bevatten waarvan de uitleg bij de uitoefening van een daarbij aangegeven bevoegdheid afhankelijk wordt gesteld van beleidsregels. Van deze mogelijkheid maken gemeenteraden in hun bestemmingsplannen vaak gebruik als het gaat om parkeernormen

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring