Key changes for renewables under the CEP

The 'Clean energy for all Europeans'-Package: Key changes for renewab

Key changes for renewables under the CEP

21.12.2018 EU law

On 21 December 2018 a substantial part of the long-awaited Clean Energy Package ("CEP") was published in the Official Journal, notably the recast Renewable Energy Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (the “recast RED”), the Energy Efficiency Directive 2018/2002 as well as the new Energy Union and Climate Action Governance Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. This legislation enters into force on 24 December 2018; the directives have to be implemented by 30 June 2021 resp. 25 June 2020.

This blog post discusses the key changes for renewable electricity projects pursuant to the cited legislation.

EU-wide target of 32% and ‘integrated national energy and climate plans’

The previous Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC set individual binding targets for all EU Member States, the sum of which should lead to a share of 20% renewable energy in the EU ‘gross final consumption of energy’ by 2020. The recast RED changes perspective and only sets an EU-wide target of 32% without any binding national targets. In other words, the 32%-target is merely binding upon the EU as a whole: “A target defined at Union level would leave greater flexibility for Member States to meet their greenhouse gas reduction targets in the most cost-effective manner in accordance with their specific circumstances, energy mix and capacity to produce renewable energy.” (recital 9)

The Member States are required to bring forward national ‘contributions’ to this EU-wide target within their ‘integrated national energy and climate plans’ (to be surrendered to the Commission by 1 January 2019). The individual national targets as set forth by the Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC remain relevant as national minimum levels. Statistical transfers between Member States remain possible for the calculation of the share of renewable energy in the Member States concerned.

The Commission will reassess the 32%-target by 2023 and submit a legislative proposal to increase it insofar this is necessary to meet international commitments related to climate change or in case of further substantial cost reductions in renewable energy production or in case of a significant decrease in energy consumption.

Market-based support mechanisms for renewable energy projects   

Following the ‘Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020’ (“EEAG”), the recast RED refers explicitly to ‘market premiums’ (sliding or fixed) to be granted in an open, transparent, competitive, non-discriminatory and cost-effective manner. Technology neutral tender procedures will be the rule, but Member States may limit these procedures to specific technologies where the first would lead to suboptimal results (e.g. need to achieve diversification). Furthermore, exceptions can be made for small-scale and demonstration projects, in accordance with the relevant EEAG thresholds (§125 and 127).

Member States retain the right to decide to which extent renewable energy produced in other Member States, is allowed to compete for support. In that sense the Ålands Vindkraft and Essent Belgium cases remain relevant. If a Member State does open up its support scheme, it may require proof of physical import and therefore limit participation in its support scheme to producers from interconnected Member States. The Commission will evaluate by 2023 the need of introducing an obligation to open up to 5% of support schemes for foreign based projects by 2025, and up to 10% by 2030. 

Member States may limit the possibility of renewable energy production installations to compete in tenders outside their territory, in order to retain control over the pace of deployment of renewable electricity capacity and the associated integration costs and grid investments (recital 24).The recast RED finally introduces a stability obligation: Member States may not revise the level or the conditions of support in a way that is detrimental for the economic viability of existing projects.1

Guarantees of origin

The recast RED provides for ‘guarantees of origin’ (“GOs”) to be awarded to all renewables (including renewable gas such as biomethane), and optionally also to non-renewable energy projects. Projects that already receive financial support under a support scheme may be excluded from receiving GOs. Alternatively, the support scheme must take into account the market value of the GO.

The abolition of the grid access and dispatching privileges for renewables

The priority rules for renewable energy, as included in the previous Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC, were meant to ensure that all renewable energy produced could at all times be injected into the grid, if necessary, with priority over conventional energy. These privileges are now abolished under the recast RED. 

The recast RED presumes that dispatching is market-based, and that renewables, often having marginal costs close to zero, will be first in the ‘merit order’ anyway. On the spot market renewable energy bids should in principle be matched by a purchase offer before any other type of electricity. 

However, sometimes in case of congestion or oversupply, the grid operator does need to make curtailment choices. In that regard, the abolition of ‘priority/guaranteed access’ leaves more flexibility to the grid operators to also curtail renewable energy installations. In this regard it should be noted that an alternative ‘light’ version of the priority regime will be provided for under the upcoming recast Electricity Regulation (on which political agreement was reached on 18 December 2018). 

Streamlined permitting procedures for renewable energy projects

The recast RED provides for mandatory permitting deadlines and ‘single points of contact’ to guide applicants through the whole process of obtaining all administrative permits to build, repower and operate renewable energy installations and connect them to the grid.

The whole procedure, from receipt of the application to delivery of a binding decision, may not take longer than two years. For installations with a capacity of less than 150kW or for repowering existing installations, the deadline is set on one year. These deadlines can be extended with another year, provided that the existence of extraordinary circumstances is demonstrated and duly justified.

For connection to the grid of small-scale installations (≤ 10.8 kW, or ≤ 50 kW and/or repowered projects if Member States opt for it) a mere notification to the DSO is sufficient.

Facilitating (jointly acting) renewables self-consumers

Although ‘self-consumers’ or ‘prosumers’ were already recognized in national renewable energy policies, they are – together with ‘renewable energy communities’ – addressed for the first time in EU legislation with the objective of facilitating the involvement of (household) consumers in renewable energy deployment. 

End customers are now explicitly entitled to become ‘prosumers’, which means that they can generate, store and consume renewable energy as well as sell the excess production and participate in the applicable support scheme, without losing their rights and obligations as end customers connected to the grid and without being faced with discriminatory or disproportionate procedures and charges.2

Prosumers must also be entitled to engage jointly in the abovementioned activities (e.g. in case of an apartment). 

Finally, the prosumer’s installation may be owned or managed by a third party, provided that this third party remains subject to the prosumer’s instructions. This is of particular relevance for ESCOs.

Facilitating renewable energy communities

End customers are also entitled to participate in ‘renewable energy communities’ without losing their rights and obligations as end customers connected to the grid, and without being faced with unjustified or discriminatory conditions or procedures.

‘Renewable energy communities’ are autonomous legal entities, based on open and voluntary participation, and effectively controlled by their shareholders or members (being natural persons, SMEs or local authorities), of which the primary purpose is to provide environmental, economic or social community benefits for its shareholders, members or for the local areas where it operates, rather than financial profits. Renewable energy communities can produce, consume (i.e. share within the community), store and sell renewable energy. In that regard they are entitled to access all suitable energy markets, directly or via an aggregator. The specificities of renewable energy communities also have to be taken into account in the design of support schemes, in order to allow those communities to compete for support on an equal footing with other (larger) participants (e.g. through the inclusion of community-focused bidding criteria). 

Renewable energy communities are closely related to the broader concept of ‘citizens energy communities’, as provided for in the upcoming recast Electricity Directive (on which political agreement was reached on 18 December 2018).

Sustainability and GHG emissions saving criteria for biomass (power plants)

Finally, while the previous Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC introduced sustainability and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions saving criteria for biofuels and bioliquids3, the recast RED now extends these criteria to biomass used in the electricity sector (and the heating and cooling sector). Consequently, it will e.g. be prohibited to get biomass from highly biodiverse forests or grasslands.4 The GHG emissions saving criteria imply that biomass used for electricity production has to reflect at least 70% GHG savings (for installations starting operation from 2021 till 2025) and at least 80% (from 2026 onwards) compared to fossil fuel-based electricity generation.The sustainability and GHG emissions saving criteria apply irrespective of the origin of the biomass, so also when imported from non-EU countries. 

Only electricity produced from biomass that is compliant with the sustainability and GHG emissions saving criteria, and that is generated in biomass power plants that meet certain criteria6, can contribute towards the (national contributions to) the EU-wide target and may be eligible for financial support under a support scheme. 

On the other hand, in order to minimize the administrative burden, the sustainability and GHG emissions saving criteria apply only to biomass used in biomass power plants with a rated thermal input ≥ 20 MW. Member States are allowed to set a lower threshold or to impose additional sustainability criteria. 

Finally, the use of biomass from food and feed crops, for which there is a high indirect land-use change risk, will be phased out gradually by 2030 for the calculation of a Member State’s gross final consumption of renewable energy. Indirect land-use change occurs when the cultivation of crops for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels displaces traditional production of crops for food and feed purposes, and as such may lead to the extension of agricultural land into areas with high-carbon stock (e.g. forests, wetlands and peatland) causing additional greenhouse gas emissions (recital 81).


1 Of course, Member States may revise the level of support in accordance with objective criteria, provided that these were established in the original design of the support scheme.

2 Nevertheless, Member States may apply non-discriminatory and proportionate charges and fees when (i) the installation of the prosumer has a capacity of more than 30 kW, (ii) the prosumer received support via the applicable support scheme for the self-generated renewable electricity (to the extent that the economic viability of the project is not undermined), or (iii) the overall share self-consumption grows above 8% of the total installed capacity in a Member State and a cost-benefit analysis confirms the necessity of these charges or fees.

3 These criteria were introduced with the goal of minimizing the environmental impacts related to the used raw materials (e.g. deforestation) and ensuring that these raw materials are converted into energy in an efficient way.

4 See art. 29, §2-7 recast RED for all sustainability criteria.

5 See art. 29, §10 and Annex VI recast RED.

6 These criteria are (alternatively): a biomass power plant (i) having a rated thermal input of < 50 MW; or (ii) having a rated thermal input from 50 MW up to 100 MW and making use of high-efficiency cogeneration technology, or for electricity-only installations* (i.e. without the use of high-efficiency cogeneration), meeting an energy efficiency level associated with the best available techniques as defined in Decision (EU) 2017/1442; or (iii) having a rated thermal input above 100 MW with use of high-efficiency cogeneration, or for electricity-only installations*, achieving a net-electrical efficiency of at least 36%; or (iv) applying carbon capture and storage. These criteria, in relation to being eligible for a support scheme, only apply for support granted under support schemes which are approved after 25 December 2021 and, in relation to contributing to the renewable energy target, only for installations starting operation after 25 December 2021.

* only if there is no cost-effective potential for the application of high-efficiency cogeneration technology according to the assessment in accordance with art. 14 of the Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/EU and only if these installations do not use fossil fuels as a main fuel.


Related news

29.07.2021 NL law
De NOW-4: grotendeels gelijk aan de NOW-3 met enkele wijzigingen

Short Reads - Het kabinet kondigde in de Kamerbrief van 27 mei 2021 het vierde noodpakket aan om de economie ten tijde van de coronacrisis te blijven ondersteunen. Onderdeel van dit noodpakket is de Vierde tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid (“NOW-4”). Op 23 juli 2021 is de NOW-4 gepubliceerd in de Staatscourant. Deze short read geeft een kort overzicht van de hoofdlijnen van de NOW-4 en de wijzigingen ten opzichte van de NOW-3.

Read more

08.04.2021 NL law
Recente NOW-jurisprudentie

Short Reads - In de afgelopen periode zijn er weer uitspraken over de NOW gepubliceerd die van belang kunnen zijn voor werkgevers. Zo zijn er uitspraken gedaan over de vaststelling van de loonsom en de keuzes die al bij de aanvraag voor de subsidieverlening moeten worden gemaakt. Daarnaast laat een recente uitspraak zien dat een civiele vordering inzake het mislopen van NOW-steun niet slaagt.

Read more

21.04.2021 NL law
Voorschotbepaling (NOW-1) en peildatumbepaling (NOW-2) zijn niet in strijd met het evenredigheidsbeginsel (annotatie)

Short Reads - In deze annotatie bespreken Jan Reinier van Angeren en Sandra Putting de eerste uitspraak van de Centrale Raad van Beroep (CRvB) over de NOW. In de uitspraak van 8 januari 2021 oordeelt de CRvB dat de voorschotbepaling uit de NOW-1 en de peildatumbepaling uit de NOW-2 niet in strijd zijn met het evenredigheidsbeginsel. De CRvB ziet daarom geen aanleiding de bepalingen in het voordeel van de desbetreffende werkgever buiten toepassing te laten. In de annotatie gaan Jan Reinier en Sandra in op een aantal bestuursrechtelijke aspecten van de NOW-subsidieregeling en de CRvB-uitspraak.

Read more

06.04.2021 NL law
Podcast: 'de NOW en het bonusverbod'

Short Reads - Hoe werkt het bonusverbod voor werkgevers die NOW aanvragen? Geldt dit verbod ook voor sales medewerkers? En, hoe zit dat nou met buitenlandse moederbedrijven die in Nederland wel bonussen mogen uitkeren? In de tweede aflevering van een vierdelige podcastserie over de NOW geven arbeidsrechtadvocaat Astrid Helstone en advocaat bestuursrecht Sandra Putting antwoord op deze en andere vragen over de NOW en het bonusverbod.

Read more

20.04.2021 NL law
Podcast: 'de NOW en faillissementen'

Short Reads - Wat gebeurt er als werkgevers die gebruikmaken van de NOW failliet gaan? Wat kunnen de curator en het UWV doen? En wat gaat er gebeuren als de overheid de NOW afbouwt of stopt? In de vierde en tevens laatste aflevering van een podcastserie over de NOW geven advocaat bestuursrecht Sandra Putting en Job van Hooff gespecialiseerd in het insolventierecht antwoord op deze en andere vragen over de NOW en de faillissementen.

Read more

29.03.2021 NL law
Podcast: De NOW en het procesrecht

Short Reads - Kan je als ondernemer een NOW-boete krijgen? Kan de verlening van de NOW nog worden gewijzigd? En, waarom is het belangrijk om juist bij de verlening van de subsidie extra goed op te letten? In de eerste aflevering van een vierdelige podcastserie over de NOW (Tijdelijke noodmaatregel Overbrugging voor behoud van Werkgelegenheid) geven arbeidsrechtadvocaat Thomas Boot en advocaat bestuursrecht Jan Reinier van Angeren antwoord op deze en andere vragen over de NOW en het procesrecht.

Read more