Short Reads

Protection of listed companies against unsolicited takeovers, prevention of unwanted influences in the telecoms sector and protection of other vital sectors: latest developments

Protection of listed companies against unsolicited takeovers, prevent

Protection of listed companies against unsolicited takeovers, prevention of unwanted influences in the telecoms sector and protection of other vital sectors: latest developments

07.08.2018 NL law

Following a recent series of (attempted) unsolicited takeovers by foreign bidders of Dutch listed companies, such as PostNL, Unilever and AkzoNobel, the protection of companies against unsolicited takeovers and the protection of vital sectors have received more attention in both the Netherlands and Europe.

In this respect, the Dutch government has published a government-coalition agreement, which describes measures that intend to shift power away from certain activist shareholders who are looking for short-term gains to shareholders and other stakeholders who have an interest in long-term value creation.

Preliminary draft legislative proposal statutory cooling-off period and obligation to register for shareholders

250-day statutory cooling-off period

The coalition agreement introduces a statutory cooling-off period of 250 days in the event of shareholder proposals for strategy changes. Listed companies facing proposals for fundamental strategy changes at their general meetings will now have the opportunity to invoke a 250-day cooling-off period, provided that this does not interfere with the principle of free movement of capital. The Minister has confirmed that this statutory cooling-off period also applies in the event of unsolicited takeover bids. During this cooling-off period, the company will be accountable for the company's strategy to the shareholders and it will need to consult all stakeholders of the company. This measure cannot be taken in combination with the company's own antitakeover measures, such as preference or priority shares. A preliminary draft of the legislative proposal has been sent to the Council of State for advice on the European-law aspects of the introduction of such a cooling-off period. The Council of State has already delivered its opinion but it has not yet been made public. The preliminary draft legislative proposal is being revised and the new version is expected to be published after the summer.

Shareholder registration

In addition, large listed companies (with an annual turnover of more than EUR 750 million) will have the opportunity to request their shareholders to register as major shareholder with the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets if they hold more than 1% of the company's share capital. Under the current legislation, such shareholders are only required to register if they hold a minimum in a company's share capital of 3%. So far, however, it is unclear whether or not this registration for shareholders holding more than 1% will be mandatory and when this will take effect.

Legislative proposal unwanted influences in the telecoms sector

In the Netherlands, the Department of Economic Affairs has published a draft legislative proposal for consultation to amend the Dutch Telecommunications Act to prevent unsolicited acquisition or exercise of control over Dutch telecoms service providers (see our Corporate Alert of 14 March 2017). This proposal is the result of public demand for protection of the Dutch telecoms infrastructure following the attempted takeover of KPN by América Movil in 2013. It will grant the Minister of Economic Affairs the authority to prohibit the acquisition or exercise of control over legal entities and partnerships active in the Dutch telecoms sector if (i) this control leads to relevant influence in the Dutch telecoms sector and (ii) as a consequence, Dutch national security or public order is compromised.

Following consultation, the legislative proposal has been modified on a number of points, with the introduction of a reporting obligation as the most notable change. On the basis of this reporting obligation, a party that is looking to acquire a Dutch telecoms company and, as a consequence, would be able to exercise significant control in the telecoms sector, must report this in advance to the Department of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy. At this moment, it is still unclear what this reporting obligation and the other changes exactly mean. The legislative proposal has been sent to the Council of State for advice and it is expected to be introduced to the House of Representatives after the summer.

Protection of vital sectors

In the Dutch government's coalition agreement, it was announced that designated companies in certain vital sectors can only be taken over if such a takeover is explicitly approved, which may be subject to additional conditions. It is currently being investigated whether this protection regime is necessary not only for the existing list of vital sectors but also for agricultural lands and certain regional infrastructural works. In this context, the EU's draft regulation designed to protect companies of strategic importance against takeovers must be taken into account. With this draft regulation, the European Commission intends to establish a new EU framework for the screening of foreign direct investments on the grounds of security or public order in the European Union.

It was announced that first an ex ante analysis would be conducted in order to map out national security risks in respect of takeovers by foreign companies, as well as to determine whether the government's current instruments provide sufficient safeguards. Depending on the findings of the analysis, further measures may need to be taken. The analysis is still being conducted and the results were expected to be announced in mid-2018.

Team

Related news

25.06.2019 LU law
The dawn of a new era of cross-border mobility within the EU?

Seminar - François Bernard, Senior Associate at Stibbe Luxembourg, will conduct a seminar in Luxembourg on 25 June in collaboration with Legitech on Directive proposal COM2018 (241 final) amending the cross-border merger regime currently enshrined in Directive (EU) 2017/1132 and introducing a new regime applicable to cross-border conversions and divisions.

Read more

18.06.2019 NL law
Countdown. Een cursus aftellen voor juristen

Articles - Hoe lang duurt een verzetstermijn nu precies? Voor juridische fusie schrijft art. 2:316 lid 2 BW voor dat tot een maand nadat alle te fuseren rechtspersonen de fusie hebben aangekondigd iedere schuldeiser bij de rechtbank tegen het voorstel tot fusie in verzet kan komen. Art. 2:317 lid 2 BW bepaalt vervolgens dat een besluit tot fusie een maand na de dag waarop alle fuserende rechtspersonen de fusie hebben aangekondigd kan worden genomen. De vraag is wanneer nu precies die verzetstermijn eindigt.

Read more

04.06.2019 NL law
Dutch Supreme Court clarifies evidentiary rules concerning signatures and signed documents

Short Reads - In two recent decisions, the Dutch Supreme Court has clarified the evidentiary power of signed documents. If the signatory unambiguously denies that the signature on the document is his or hers or claims that another party has tampered with the signature (for instance, through forgery or copying a signature from one document and pasting it in another), it is up to the party invoking the signed document to prove the signature's authenticity (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:572).

Read more

20.06.2019 NL law
Stibbe advises Westermeerwind

Inside Stibbe - The District Court Midden-Nederland ruled in favour of Westermeerwind B.V. on 19 June, in a case brought by organisations acting for the 'Westermeerwind Group'. The group had claimed that the 32 members of that group had the right to participate in the Windpark Westermeerwind at a much lower price than other participants, and with a different corporate structure.

Read more

03.06.2019 NL law
Toerekening van kennis van groepsvennootschappen

Articles - In de praktijk doet zich vaak de vraag voor of kennis die aanwezig is binnen de ene vennootschap kan worden toegerekend aan een andere vennootschap binnen hetzelfde concern. In dit artikel verkent Branda Katan zowel de dogmatische grondslag als de praktische toepassing van een dergelijke toerekening. Zij concludeert dat het ‘Babbel-criterium’ (heeft in de gegeven omstandigheden de kennis X in het maatschappelijk verkeer te gelden als kennis van Y?) geschikt is voor het toerekenen van kennis in concernverband.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring